ipl-logo

Common Law Characteristics

1220 Words5 Pages

1. Outline the main characteristics of a common law legal system.
“Common law dates from the 11th century when William I set up Royal Courts to apply a uniform (common) system of law across the whole of England” (Hughes & Ferrett 2011). Until that time there were laws that were differently interpreted from one city to another. “Common law is generally uncodified system. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases” (Robbins n.d.)
Common law is case law made by judges based on similar decisions of courts. The …show more content…

Outline the main characteristics of a Civil Law legal system
The Civil Law has its origin in the ancient Rome and it was the main attribute to the Roman civilization.
“Civil Law is a codified system. Countries with civil law system have comprehensive, continuously updated legal codes that specify all the matters capable of being brought before a court, the applicable procedure, and the appropriate punishment for each offense” (Robbins n.d.)
Every country has its own sets of laws, rules, principles and regulation based on different matters. It means that every country has a written constitution based on specific codes and only the legislative enactments must be applied. Civil law judges apply the codes that are written by scholars and enacted by legislators. The judges may also check legal treaties that are similar to the current case. Civil law system presumes that every single problem has its own solution (Civil law …show more content…

It has two main parts: private and public law. Private law is concerned with all the civil and commercial matters (e.g. marriage, divorce or contractual matters). Public law deals with the government matters which derive in constitutional law, criminal law and administrative law.
In Civil law system, the judge has the responsibility to collect all the evidences and to arrange meetings and hearings with the witnesses (usually in private).

3. Critically analyze the comparative advantages of each system.
Common Law and Civil Law are two main legal systems that are very different. They each have a different background that developed their own features, their basic principles and how those principles should be applied.
The historical origin of Common Law and Civil Law
The origin of Common Law is in England while the Civil Law has the origins in the Roman Empire.
Countries where were developed
Common Law has developed in England, South Africa and

Show More
Related
150 Words | 1 Pages

there are a truly incredible total number of various laws in our country and many different areas of the laws.. So many in fact, that there is not one single person who could possibly know all of them. Specialty courts are to the legal system as doctor specialists are to the medical system. The people in these courts know a lot within one certain area of the law.

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

The American Legal System The American legal system has been influenced by many historical rulers and laws. Three that have influenced the American legal system the most are Roman laws, moral laws and Hammurabi’s code in my opinion. One legal system that influenced the American legal system are Roman laws. I picked Roman law because it said that law has been defined as the “Art of social control”; a system of rules regulating the conduct of man.

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

The relationship between the law and society affects everyone and everything. How the law is written and how it is acted upon in society are two different things. It is imperative, therefore, that we as citizens pay attention to and understand the importance of the relationship between the law and society as it affects both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We engage in and witness the power of the law and society everyday. The law is personal, however, the law is also discretionary depending on where you look.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

Legal history A system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties, this is the definition of law. Although the definition of law is evident and perceptible,the portrayal and act of law varies. Throughout the justice system there are many inconsistencies such as the type of law, there is common,criminal,civil, and administrative. Throughout these systems of law there are also criminal proceedings. In these criminal proceedings, some will find that the verdict is just.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

In the Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young British boys crash land on an island. During a time of despair and war the boys work together to get rescued. The conflict between good and evil in humanity is an important theme in the book which defines the character’s behaviors and actions through the time that they are on the island and the decisions they make to get rescued and return home. The good in humanity is shown throughout the story by a few of the characters choices and beliefs. For example, “‘We need an assembly.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

In America, the judiciary has a legal system that helps solve any personal, economic, social, and political problems or cases. These cases are withheld in a court and presented to a judge and either a grand, petite, or hung jury to finalize their jurisdiction on the problem. In this essay, I will explain the structure of the Texas court system and their type of cases. To start, civil and criminal cases are two types of cases in this legal system. Civil cases handle private rights and remedies, personal injury suits, divorces, child custodies, or breach-of-contracts.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

The court structure in the United States is comprised of a dual court system. The dual court system consists of “one system of state and local courts and another system of federal courts” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 274). Although the system has a separate court system for state and federal court, they do connect in the United States Supreme Court. Each court has various levels of jurisdiction to hear and make decisions over cases (Bohm & Haley, 2011).

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

While there are many more concepts of law that the book mentions I feel that these are the most important concepts of law that somehow are the foundations of the legal system in the United

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

The laws stand as a basic understanding of right from wrong and allowed civilizations to keep the most peace among their people as they

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Eventually, a special court known as the Court of Chancery was set up by the King. The holdings of this court depended upon the conscience and morality of the Lord Chancellor unlike the rulings of the Common Law Courts. The law that was established and enforced in the Court of Chancery resulted in the emergence of what is now known as ‘Equity’. Over time, Equity became more popular as it had greater flexibility and was more approachable than Common Law.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally two types of trials, criminal and civil. The jurisdiction of the courts in civil or criminal matters are contained in the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Article 121 of the Constitution provides for two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the High Court in Malaya, and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. Thus this creates two separate local jurisdiction of the courts – for Peninsular Malaysia and for East Malaysia.

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

In the article entitled ‘Determining the Ratio Decidendi of the Case’ by Arthur L. Goodhart, I underwent a roller coaster-like journey on exploring the science behind the nature of a precedent in English law. Goodhart started with the attempt to explain the full meaning of ratio decidendi in the simplest terms. He referred to Sir John Salmond’s definition in which I have interpreted ratio decidendi as the principle of law that is found in a court decision and possesses the authority to be binding. Ratio decidendi should be distinguished from a judicial decision, as the latter is a wider concept and contains the ratio decidendi, whereas the former is a principle that carries the force of law. In another reference, Professor John Chipman Gray

Read More

More about Common Law Characteristics

Related Topics

Open Document