Comparative Analysis
Naomi Klein’s and Collin’s may not have the same ideological terms and definitions to approach global warming; thus, they both share the idea to demonstrate the global warming change as a facing danger that we must eradicate. Collins with “Toxic Loopholes” emphasizes more on investigation and international negotiations in environmental law. Naomi focuses on recruiting people for “blockadia” activism sharing her activism through her journalist job. Naomi believes that we are “guests” on this planet capable of changing the royal society and the nations with renewable energy. Her work stands out because she demonstrates real-life stories together with an analysis in powerful, abrupt and memorable ways. The purpose of her book, “This Changes Everything,” is to get people to abandon individualism, and to change the economic system to liberal capitalism since she has objectively pointed out that capitalism is the source of the problem. Her thesis is not about a political movement unlike Collin’s, who goes on by introducing scientific facts. On chapter seven, “Prospects for Environmental Cooperation- Four Theories,” Collins covers each one of the global categories: Neorealism, Neoliberalism, World System Theory and the
…show more content…
Why has it been labyrinthine for climate change when nations after all worked together for ozone depletion? Referring to Klein’s arguments, and going back to previous statements , Klein’s book introduction sets up the premises and her own journey from denial to focusing on the climate crisis, and finally to seeing the potential of the climate justice movement to address the complex of issues presented by capitalist