ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast A Strong State Government

697 Words3 Pages

Strong federal government v Strong state government The federalists and Democratic-Republicans are like K-State and KU; they both don’t agree on everything. They were the first political parties. Both the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans didn’t listen to George Washington’s advice and they made separate parties. This caused conflict within the government when they couldn’t decide. The Federalists had very strong views about the government as a whole. The party wanted to a strong national government. Most Federalists were from the northern states. Alexander Hamilton wanted the strong national government for the interests of commerce and industry. This would give america money and why would America need money? The United States …show more content…

Thomas Jefferson was one of the leaders of the Democratic-Republican party. Thomas was the third president of The United States. Jefferson and Hamilton often didn’t agree on anything that came up. If there was something to debate, they debated the topic. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a strong national government. They thought it was too much like Great Britain and they didn’t want that again. A strong state government helped reduce the power of the president and that is exactly what Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists wanted. The Anti-Federalists used the Articles of Confederation in most of their decisions. The Articles greatly influenced the Democratic-Republicans in most of their opinions. The Anti- Federalists liked the Articles better because it gave states more powers and rights than the Constitution. When the Federalists ratified the constitution, it did not go well with the other side, the Anti- Federalist. The ratification of the Constitution really helped the Federalists cause. This change gave more power and much needed power to the federal government, but the Democratic- Republicans didn’t like that. The Anti- Federalists liked the weaker national government because they couldn't abuse powers and they would need the states. They didn’t want to run into the same issues that they ran away from with Great

Show More
Related
656 Words | 3 Pages

After series of taxation without representation placed upon the American colonies by the Great Britain, the colonies finally declared independence in 1776. To become a stabilized country, the colonies established the Article of Confederation the following year. Americans were upset that under the Article of Confederation their voice was not being heard in the government and their businesses were failing economically. As a result, Daniel Shays led four thousand rebels against the government because of the economic and civil rights injustices. Then the Founding Fathers gathered at the Philadelphia in 1787 to modify the Article of Confederation.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

The creation of a strong national government from the Constitution was meant to reverse the problems created by the Articles of Confederation. America now had a central government, not just state governments. The central government could now, “collect taxes, raise an army, regulate interstate commerce, etc.” This gave the federal government a lot of power that was nonexistent before.

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

According to the Articles of Confederation the states had power and the federal government was to help the states. This system as many was filled with fraud. There also was no stable trading system with other countries. Britain would not allow the states to have a trade and this was causing trouble with the states. The states had a meeting where there were two separate groups the federalist and the anti-federalist.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

Washington said that we must avoid forming political parties because it would separate our country. We ignored him then, but look at where we are now, boy was he right. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were two people of separate political parties who disagreed on almost every matter. Hamilton used to be poor and grew up in St.Croix. When he was sent to the mainland he became the loud mouthed Secretary of Treasury under Washington’s leadership.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism was an influential political movement that supported ratification of the US Constitution and was discontent with the Articles of Confederation that limited the central government’s power. The outlook and vision of the Federalist Party called for a stronger national government, a loose construction of the Constitution and a mercantile, rather than agricultural, economy. Leading Federalists Alexander Hamilton and Chief Justice John Marshall helped shape the development of our nation’s government branches with their views that they expressed about ratifying and interpreting our Nation’s newly drafted Constitution. For Federalists during this time period, upholding and honoring the United States Constitution was extremely important in order to safe guard

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were two of the political philosophers in the United States during the 1800s. They were always going head to head on topics from who should govern the people,how the government should be structured, economics, and foreign policy. Jefferson, who was a Democratic-Republican supported the common people’s rights. He also wanted to limit the powers of the federal government. Hamilton on the other hand was of the Federalist party who was against the common people having any say so in how things were ran.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Even way back when the country was founded, there was a definite split between two political perspectives. The Federalists wanted to abolish the Democratic-Republicans, and vice versa. The huge differences that divided the two parties include, Who the country should be ruled by, state power in the union, how the constitution should be applied, alliance with countries in Europe, banks, and trade. Let's start with some basic background information. The Federalists were people who thought that the quarreling states could come together and make a perfect republic.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

They had different beliefs about who should govern, the structure of the government, and economics. Jefferson thought a lot of farmers, even saying that “Those who till the soil are God’s finest creation…” . He thought that a person should be able to make and provide for themselves and their families. He also wanted to restrict the federal government power and lower voting qualifications so everyone could vote. Hamilton on the other hand, believed that the common people, or farmers, were foolish.

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander Hamilton is widely accepted as a very important founding father. He fought in the Revolutionary War, was the first secretary of the Treasury, and help found the first national bank. He was also a part of one of the first political parties to emerge in America-the Federalist Party. Here are six political views of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution was drafted as a replacement to the Articles of Confederation—the first constitution of the US which loosely held the states together. When the Constitution was being drafted, there was much debate on how much power the Central Government should have. The Anti-Federalists believed in States’ Rights, while the Federalists wanted to give more power to the Central Government. The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratifying of the Constitution. A compromise was made—the new Constitution of the United States would include a Bill of Rights.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

They form the first two political parties. The two parties was called republicans and federalist. Jefferson was for the republicans. Republicans believed in a strict construction. Hamilton was for the federalist.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

One group was the Federalists who supported more authority given to the central government and the idea that the central government has the power to implement and enforce any law that they felt was necessary to perform its duties. The other group was the Republicans who believed that the states should have the most authority and that the central government should mediate between the states. Their viewpoints differed on a variety of things which helped to shape our government even more and set precedents on when the government should intervene in domestic and foreign disputes. The

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast A Strong State Government

Related Topics

Open Document