ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Boom And Disaster In The Sky

502 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thesis of space exploration

Mason Wooley
Kalyn Maynard
Mrs. Coleman
9th Hour
27 January 2023
Boom, a disaster in the sky has struck. People are shocked. The challenger blew up in the sky. The astronauts' family were on the ground watching. In the two articles “Disaster in the Sky” and the History channel they have many similarities and differences. One similarity may be that they both focused on how a 37-year old teacher was going to teach a lesson in space. One difference may be that in "Disaster in the Sky" McDonald tried to warn NASA about the faulty O-rings. On the other hand, the history channel in Nasa had no warning.
In the stories they both talk about how a teacher was going to teach a lesson from space. A 37-year old high school social studies teacher from New Hampshire named Christa McAuliffe. This was a big deal for everyone …show more content…

In the scope article The text states,¨In the end, Thiokol changed its recommendation. Leaders at the company were concerned that if NASA wasn’t happy with them, Thiokol could lose millions of dollars in future business.” (Scope). This shows McDolond was trying to warn them about the danger. On the other hand, In the History Channel Article there was no warning from anyone.The text states, “The investigation determined that the disaster was caused by the failure of an “O-ring” seal in one of the two solid-fuel rockets. The elastic O-ring did not respond as expected because of the cold temperature at launch time, which began a chain of events that resulted in the massive loss. As a result, NASA did not send astronauts into space for more than two years as it redesigned a number of features of the space shuttle.” (History). This explains that there was no warning about the danger of liftoff said to Nasa from anyone. The authors wanted us to understand that no one expected that this would happen. All that was said was from McDonald about the harsh

Show More
Related

Challenger Speech Rhetorical Analysis

776 Words | 4 Pages

Finely the president tied the incident that day to events that took place 390 years ago, the great explorer Sir Francis Drake who died in see. Bringing this he is comparing the Challenger seven to Sir Francis Drake, he is also telling the public in order for them to explore there should be sacrifices, and public should never turn its back to the program. Though, President Reagan’s speech about Challenger shuttle was short, it carried a lot emotions expressed by his tone of voice and his ability to deliver the speech, moreover, he did an effective job of persuading his audience, whether he was mourning them or informing them the message was clear. However the president didn’t have the right strategy about the part he was apologizing to the children that was watching, he should never had to mention another teacher going to space in his speech.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Regan's Challenger Seven

788 Words | 4 Pages

As Regan attempts to explain this devastating accident to the younger generation, he attempts to explain how tragic events such as these are normal, as they’re “all part of the process of exploration and discovery, all part of taking a chase a dne expanding a man’s horizon.” By Regan explaining forth the unavoidable dangers that are simply embedded into the action of doing something major such as exploring space, his logic exemplifies how there’s never a case where achieving something monumental is easy, as challenges will also come alongside it. Although this might sound frightening to children, Regan’s empathic approach is able to bring forth an emotional message towards the mind of the new generation. In another instance, Regan compares the explosion of the Challenger to other events in the past, as it proves to be the

Read More

President Reagan Ethos Pathos Logos

599 Words | 3 Pages

Within this address President Reagan uses his unspoken credibility to show his empathy for those involved in the Challenger Disaster. Throughout the address he uses pathos to connect with those grieving the loss of such brave pioneers. President Reagan uses this opportunity to give hope to the nation that the expansion of space exploration has not come to a halt.

Read More

Ronald Reagan Speech Rhetorical Analysis Essay

873 Words | 4 Pages

One minute and thirteen seconds. The last entry on the flight transcript: LOSS OF ALL DATA. On January 28, 1986, the Challenger Space Shuttle exploded 73 seconds into its flight. Aboard were five astronauts, one of whom, Christa McAuliffe, was ready to become the first school teacher in space. Sadly, none of the five survived.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan's Speech

1042 Words | 5 Pages

“To infinity and beyond” wasn’t always so joyful. On January 28, 1986, seven astronauts died from the space shuttle Challenger explosion. Ronald Reagan was given the daunting task of addressing the accident to the nation and bringing comfort to them. He made a decision to postpone his state of the union speech so he could help the nation cope with this tragedy. His speech had to acknowledge every group of people from the school children watching on tv, to the families of the victim, and NASA too.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan's The Challenger Disaster

736 Words | 3 Pages

We as Americans will always respect them, and never forget them. Lastly, President Reagan portrays the astronauts as heroes and explorers by portraying them as adventure seekers in the name of discovery. This causes the audience to believe that although they died, they would still live through advances in the space program. “And perhaps we’ve forgotten the courage it took for the crew of the shuttle; but they, the Challenger Seven, we aware of the dangers, but overcame them and did their jobs brilliantly.” By saying that, Reagan led many Americans to believe that this was indeed a very hard and scary job.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan's Challenger Address

438 Words | 2 Pages

Analysis of Ronald Reagan’s Challenger Address Ronald Regan gave his Challenger Address on January 28, 1986 in place of his State of the Union Address. His plans for the speech were morphed into that which was presented in response to the tragedy of the Challenger shuttle’s explosion and subsequent deaths of seven astronauts, witnessed by the American public both in person and via live broadcast. Given that this great loss happened the day of the speech, it was composed quickly and concisely to acknowledge the mourning of the American people and their concerns regarding the continuation of the space program. During his speech, Regan praises the progress and sacrifices made by the Amercian space program and the astronauts in the Challenger. By doing so, he

Read More

Should We Cut NASA Funding Keith Yost Analysis

1086 Words | 5 Pages

In persuading the audience of his credibility, the overall effectiveness of the article will shoot up along with it. Another Counter-argument that he uses is “the more poetic among us say that NASA has given millions hope, that it is a symbol of ingenuity and ambition of the human race” (Yost). He sympathizes with the audience and takes in the viewpoint of the opposition. It makes people believe that he is giving them an effective argument.

Read More

Ronald Reagan Challenger Disaster Rhetorical Analysis

1002 Words | 5 Pages

On January 28th, 1986, Ronald Reagan, the president of the United States at the time, in his speech, entitled “Challenger Disaster,” addressed the Challenger Disaster. He supported this claim by first mourning over the tragedy, then he promoted NASA, also he tried to make sense of this calamity, and finally he informed the audience that the seven astronauts will never be forgotten and as a country we will be forever thankful for their service. Through Reagan’s use of tone, rhetorical analysis, and rhetorical tools he effectively persuaded America to mourn and appreciate the lives of the seven astronauts loss and to convince American people to continue their support for NASA and move forward as a country. Reagan unified America with his supportive

Read More

Ronald Reagan's Speech Challenger Speech

922 Words | 4 Pages

(Dennis 714) By giving the members of the space shuttle crew a recognition as “pioneers”, the speech was poised for a smooth transition from its nature as sincere eulogy into a rhetorical work with a deliberative occasion. As soon as audience received a message implying that Challenger was a beginning instead of an end and how discovery has its risk, Ronald Reagan was in a good position to elaborate his objectives on the space program. Surely, the transition between the bad news and the new hope is one of the greatest features of the speech.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By President Reagan

1445 Words | 6 Pages

Seventy three seconds into its flight, the Challenger space shuttle exploded, killing all seven passengers on board. This including Christa McAuliffe, who was to be the first civilian in space. This was to be the Challenger’s tenth mission and, regrettably, it turned out to be its final one as well. Following an investigation called by President Reagan, it was determined that the crash was ultimately caused by two rubber O-Rings designed to separate the rocket boosters that failed due to cold temperatures on the morning of the launch (“Challenger Disaster”). In his address to the nation on January 28, 1986, President Reagan uses allusion, pathos, and tone to comfort the audience after the catastrophic events.

Read More

Risks In Learning To Read By Frances Ellen Watkins

889 Words | 4 Pages

The story, "Address to the Nation on the Explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger." starts off as bad news to the United States presented by president Ronald Reagan. He uses compare and contrast and cause and effect in his announcement. He informs the people of the US about the explosion on the rocket in which killing 7 people. He then stated, "But they, the Challenger Seven, were aware of the dangers, but overcame them and did their jobs brilliantly.” which tells the reader about how the people who volunteered to take the risk of their lives for their nation.

Read More

Jekyll And Mr Hyde Personality

316 Words | 2 Pages

“Man is not truly one, but truly two” It is very difficult to lead a respectable life in society without both the good and bad sides of one's personality surfacing, or so is the case with Dr. Jekyll in Robert Louis Stevenson's "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde". Dr. Jekyll recognized within himself two warring personalities, and in the name of science, discovered how to isolate these personalities to create two, distinct individuals with almost opposite natures. Jekyll himself remaining genuine and good, and a friend to many. While his opposite personality, that had taken the form of Edward Hyde, was unruly and mischievous, quite simply, he was the evil side of Jekyll. Jekyll struggles with trying to manage living two, single natured lives, but ultimately

Read More

Figurative Language In Ronald Reagan's Speech On 7 Astronauts

272 Words | 2 Pages

Reagan applies oratorical devices and figurative language to explain to the nation the passion and bravery the seven astronauts have. He uses parallel structure and listing to imply the passion and bravery the Challenger crew have. “But, we never lost an astronaut in flight, we’ve never had a tragedy like this” (2). The parallel structure creates a cause and effect to the tragedy. Its shocking devastation, however, it shows the nation how the future is creating new things.

Read More

Ronald Reagan Speech Rhetorical Analysis

850 Words | 4 Pages

Former President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, in his address to the nation about the Challenger explosion, distinguishes the terrifying news of the explosion of the space shuttle. Reagan's purpose is to remember the lives lost in this painful accident and to ensure that space program will keep our faith with its future in space. He adopts a sorrowful tone in order to acknowledge all the courage and breakers that those seven astronauts expressed to his nation. Reagan opens his tribute to the Challenger astronauts by recognizing that this accident delayed his State of the Union address and by showing the pain of him and his wife’s grief. He appeal to the emotions of the listeners by expressing that “today is a day for mourning and remembering” (Reagan, 1986), that he and his wife are “pained to the core” (Reagan, 1986), and that we all know that this accident is “truly a national loss” (Reagan, 1986).

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Boom And Disaster In The Sky

Related Topics

Open Document