More handpicked essays just for you.
Social impacts of american civil war
Effects of the civil war on american society
Societal changes resulted from the american civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After a series of correspondence between General Ulysses S Grant and Robert E Lee, they agreed to meet On April 9th, 1865, both Grant and Lee met at the Appomattox Court House to discuss the terms of surrender Grant and Lee remembered each other from the Mexican - American war Around four in the afternoon, General Lee officially surrendered Upon the surrender, General Grant allowed the Confederate soldiers to retain some freedoms He allowed them to keep their sidearms, horses, and other items He also allowed them to return to their homes under probation News of the surrender took time to travel to the rest of the Confederate soldiers
Grant on the other hand was not raised wealthy at all he knew the struggle, he had a vision for where he thought the future was going. Completely different, but exactly the same when it came to their personality. Almost the same even when they were fighting, Grant fought with tenacity, Lee fought knowing he would give his life at any second if he had too. This is why people looked up
During the American Civil War, General Ulysses S. Grant was a more successful general and was able to win many of the battles and was able to switch the War from Confederate dominance to Union dominance. Robert E. Lee was ranked 2nd in his class at Military college West Point in 1849. He had no demerits and was a very studious man. Not one to go to parties or to drink, while most did, including Future General Ulysses s. Grant. While Lee was studying and working hard to keep his grades up and learn as much possible, Grant would go out and drink at bars and have a fun time doing things he should not be doing.
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
In September 1862, a battle was fought in a small town in Maryland. More lives were lost than any other battle or war that the United States has ever experience before or since. This battle had no true winner but it did have consequeses that changed the course of the Civil War. In James M. McPherson’s book Crossroads of Freedom Antietam The Battle That Changed the Course of the Civil War, he shows how small events added up to lead to the Battle of Antietam and ultimately to the North winning the Civil War.
In Bruce Catton’s article, “Grant and Lee: A study in Contrasts” he contrasts the differences in the ideologies of the north and the south, while comparing the similarities between the generals themselves. To develop the thesis Catton begins by providing historical context on the two generals working out the terms for surrender of the south, this sets the stage for the next few paragraphs contrasting them. When he contrasts the generals he describes their childhoods and then goes on to describe the ideologies they supported. After this, the author compares the similarities between the generals, which tells the reader that despite the fact they lead two opposing factions in the civil war they weren’t so different as people.
Robert Edward Lee didn’t have an exciting or special life growing up before the Civil War, however, as he got older, things changed and he became a special part of our country. Robert Edward Lee was born to Revolutionary War hero Henry “ Light-Horse Harry” Lee in Stratford Hall, Virginia on January 19, 1807 ( Civil War Trust ).Although he had a financial hardship that caused his father to depart to the West Indies, youthful Robert made a permanent appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point, where he graduated second in the class of 1829 ( Civil War Trust ).Two years following, him and Mary Anna Randolph Custis which was a descendant of George Washington’s adopted son, John Parke Custis, got married ( Civil War Trust ).Instead
General Lee was a great strategic war general. He won many great battles for the Confederacy. The biggest battle he won was the Battle of Chancellorsville, which was against a larger Union army. Lee was brave and never lost faith in his
President Abraham Lincoln, in his inaugural address, addresses the topic of the civil war and its effects on the nation and argues that America could be unified once more. He supports his claim by using massive amounts of parallel structure and strong word choice. Lincoln ‘s purpose is to contemplate the effects of the civil war in order to unite the broken America once again. He adopts a very hopeful tone for his audience, the readers of the inaugural address and others interested in the topic of American history and the civil war.
Catton wrote this essay in a manner that is an exemplar student comparison and contrast essay. He used both methods of subject-by-subject and point-by-point to show the comparison and contrast. At first, he contrasted between the two generals and used the subject-by-subject method. Paragraphs four through six were all about Lee and there was no contrast yet since Catton had only introduced Lee at that time in his essay. Then, in paragraphs seven through nine he talked about Grant and contrasted the two generals using point-by-point since he had now introduced both generals in his essay.
There are many different opinions and texts about the man J. Bruce Ismay. Two texts that present these differences and similarities are, "Bruce Ismay: Coward, Villain, or A Man Who was Judged Unfairly?", and, "Family of Titanic's owner, J Bruce Ismay, Make Plea". While some texts are biased, like, "Family of Titanic's owner, J Bruce Ismay, Make Plea", which leans towards Ismay trying to save his life, or the film "Titanic", which favors Ismay as a coward and stealing a spot on a lifeboat, some are neutral like "Bruce Ismay: Coward, Villain, or A Man Who was Judged Unfairly?", which debate all sides of the story evenly. Since these two passages present different theories, it is clear why the two texts compel differences in the two texts. An example of a difference, or even a disagreement is that in the article, "Bruce Ismay: Coward, Villain, or A Man Who was Judged Unfairly?"
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
Grant and Lee It all began in April 1865. Two of the greatest Americans decided to meet, and wrestle the thought of what needed to be done to end the Civil War. Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee had important similarities, but also had differences. Both men had superior characteristics that helped them make the decisions they did during the Civil War.
The American Civil War changed Americans and their ideals about freedom in many ways. Northern and Southern United states began to have simmering tensions for the states’ rights versus federal authority, plus westward expansion, and slavery had huge effects on the states. An election which made anti-slavery Republican Abraham Lincoln the president of the United States of America in 1860, caused seven of the southern states to concede from the Union to make The Confederate States Of America soon after four more joined afterwards. It changed Americans in many ways as neighbors fought each other through the 4 gruesome years of the war. Conflict between the sides were like fights between brother and brother instead with many deaths.
