The question of what Bruce Lee’s thought on Achilles is as followed; Achilles and Bruce are similar to an extent. They are both view as historically great fighters who both dominated their eras. Bruce Lee would have thought of Achilles as a legend and someone he would have looked up too. Lee would have thought that Achilles would have been a great opponent to face because of his outstanding toughness. In fact, Achilles was so tough, that the body part known as the Achilles tendon was named after him. As far as skillset goes, Lee would have felt that he would have been able to defeat Achilles, because lee had the attitude and mindset that he was the world’s best fighter. Regardless, the respect Bruce lee would have had for Achilles would have …show more content…
This type of strategy allowed the infantry groups to form an outside formation which in turn allowed to too withstand attacks from the enemy. Too quickly define what a cultural hegemony is, this is a type of society where the ruling class manipulates and decides what the culture will be for that given society. Unlike the strategy of the satisfied power, the strategy of the acquisitive power is completely the opposite. Acquisitive power focuses more on offense, loose political consolidation, and cultural pluralism (Lecture 4 Slide 13). Cultural pluralism is where smaller groups still have their own identities within the larger group of which they live in. In addition, their values and practices are accepted by the larger culture in which they live in. The term that applies to the Roman Empire is the “satisfied power’. This is because of how the Roman’s formed their infantry formations and how their military strategies were. They would form all of their men along the perimeters of their empire. In fact, the troops were actually situated around the walls. By doing this formation, this meant that the Roman’s were not able to maintain