More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about catherine the great
Report essay for the book catherine the great
Report essay for the book catherine the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hatshepsut would be different. ”says in paragraph 13. This shows that she was a bold woman and that is important in leading a country. In conclusion, Hatshepsut was an effective ruler who ruled her country
Catherine De Medici, the queen of France, actively positioned her 3 sons as potential mates for Elizabeth. While Elizabeth showed now interest in the first two were quickly dismissed, she showed some interest in the third, Francis, Duke of Alencon. This would prove to be a beneficial alliance for both England and France. Elizabeth was very well aware and she strongly considered the benefits, although, she never actually went through with it. This points out how she was able to see the advantages and disadvantages of marriage.
She knew that she needed to firmly plant her then fragile position and take charge in changing Russia for the better. Catherine began by working towards fixing the country, which was to first and most importantly increase the wealth of the country. She had begun moving Russia toward a more modern society by creating jobs and bringing in new technology from the western world. Catherine had created economic reforms to help Russia with its current financial situation and to bring more wealth to the country. Russia had a large abundance of land and Catherine had made that her primary focus, she encouraged farmers to do more, she also contributed to more machinery to help with the efficiency of farming.
Cathrine II is the most renowned and longest ruling female monarch of Russia. She began her rule in 1762 when her husband, Emperor Peter III, was overthrown. She ruled until her death in 1796. Cathrine made various new cities and towns, along with reforming the administration of Russia guberniyas, a major administrative subdivision of the Russian Empire. She also believed in the policies of Westernization, causing her to modernize Russia.
Much like Peter she was bent on establishing naval bases for the Russian navy and was able to once again secure ports as Russia annexed Crimea and land along the Black Sea from the Ottoman Empire. An excellent example of this was Catherine the Great as she sought to emulate the West, by releasing statements in support of Western ideals of human rights. But in reality she also expanded serfdom and violently crushed peasant revolutions. This shows, that although Catherine may have wanted to emulate western culture, she also wanted to maintain her power and would crush these uprisings at the cost of these values.
From the 1600s to the 1800s a lot of African Americans were involved with the issue of slavery. During that time there were many rebellions for them to get their rights back. The important actions that leading figures such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Nat Turner, during that crucial period, helped many African Americans towards freedom. Harriet Tubman,an escaped slave, became an Abolitionist helping other enslaved blacks, putting her own life at risk. She led hundreds of enslaved people to freedom along the route of the Underground Railroad.
In the 1860’s slavery was a major issue and these abolitionists believed that it should be abolished. Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln all contributed to the movement towards freedom. Harriet Tubman helped freedom by helping the slaves runaway into the Canada. Tubman not only did the runways missions slaves but also helped them settle in Canada. She once said “freedom is not bought with dust”showing that you would need to work for what you want.
“Queen Elizabeth I's Speech to the Troops at Tilbury, 1588”, and “Patrick Henry's Speech to the Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775”, are two powerful speeches delivered at different times in history, but both speeches share similarities and differences in their use of rhetorical appeals. One similarity between the two speeches would be that both of them use pathos, which is an appeal to the emotions of the audience. Queen Elizabeth I used pathos by showing the importance of the English soldiers in the face of Spanish invasion. She appealed to their sense of nationalism and loyalty, which inspired the troops to fight. Patrick Henry also used pathos by talking about some of the dangers that faced the colonies.
As an absolute monarch, Catherine the Great changed Russia in many positive ways; multiple historians even consider her to be one of the most enlightened rulers of her time. Catherine was the longest reigning female monarch of Russia and accomplished many things during her 34 years in the crown. She dreamed of establishing a reign of order and justice, of spreading education and of developing a national culture. By writing several books, pamphlets and educational materials, she improved Russia’s schooling system. Looking to improve the education of her people, Catherine studied the systems created by other countries.
By comparing Mary to Haskins, it becomes clear that Mary had different reactions to receiving threat letters from fans is frightening, whereas Haskin’s doesn’t want to do anything about it. Evidence that demonstrates Mary’s reaction is when Mary says “this is not some interesting coach lesson, don this is about people’s lives , you can’t gamble with peoples live. This reveals Mary wants to do something before it gets worse. However, Haskins responds by ‘you don’t understand. I promised those boys we’re on our way to winning the conference’s if we do make it to the tournaments, we can’t stop now.
Introduction Paragraph- How would you like to have the life of Columbus and Marie. Christopher Columbus and Marie Currie both love their jobs. Many kids ask why are people so different well this essay will tell you how people are different. They came from to different time periods and strived for different things.
The Underground Railroad was helpful to slaves because it helped them escape and be free. Slaves not only wanted to be free they also wanted their families to be free. The Underground Railroad did just that. The Underground Railroad was not underground nor a railroad it was just called underground because of its secretive nature and railroad because of the emerging transportation. Harriet Tubman was a women who wanted to be free!
Catherine made Russia a significant force in Europe as a well governed political country as well as expanded the Russian territory, through this she showed great leadership styles such she was a good team leader, participative leader, servant leader and transformational leader As a women in a male dominated society, Catherine the great was met with resistance at first. She wanted to
“How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.” Can love even be measured? It is such an intense feeling that can entirely transform the way that people view the world. It can be experienced more intensely for some compared to others.
Cleopatra and Joan of Arc are two of the most powerful and influential women to ever have lived. Although each one led for their own purposes, and in their own style, the consequences of their actions still have ripples in today’s world. Whether it be because of Cleopatra’s beauty or ruthlessness, or Joan of Arc’s faith and purity both women are considered iconic figures in the global community. Throughout time both Joan of Arc and Cleopatra have been documented as extremely influential characters in history. Cleopatra and Joan of Arc were iconic in different ways, for different reasons but it is undeniable that without them, the world wouldn’t be as it is today.
