ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution

670 Words3 Pages

Texas Constitution V. Maine Constitution What is a constitution? According to Merriam Webster Dictionary a constitution is a document that describes the system of beliefs and laws by which a country, state or organization is governed. In numerous ways, the Texas and Maine constitution are similar documents. The both contain a bill of right that protects the civil rights and liberties from the government. The one similarities of the Maine and Texas constitution is the gun law. In Maine State the gun law states that “Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned” also the Texas constitution also states that “Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the state; but the legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crimes.” The two documents do not prohibit the use of …show more content…

The removal of this right dehumanizes prisoners. The streets of Texas are filled with blue or white collar criminals on bail or simply waiting for their sentence. Presently, if individual are found guilty of a crime, but they are not given a judicial sentence they are still allowed to vote; why should there be treated differently from convicted criminals who are locked up? However, allowing prisoners to vote while in prison would increase voting turnout and also Texas would gain the reputation of becoming one of the two states that allow prisoners to vote while in prison. The Texas and Maine state constitution are both used to govern their respective states. They both limit government, separation of powers, and also they both have bill of rights that protect the rights of the people. But, in various ways, the documents have key differences that distinguishes one from

Show More
Related
1159 Words | 5 Pages

DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

The NYS constitution’s Bill of Rights last ratified in 1938 with 18 sections, but three repealed later. The difference between NYS Bill of Rights and the US are the combination of the same rights in a single amendment. For instance, the first amendment in the U.S. Bill of rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise…..; abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;….. Right of the people peaceably to assemble, petition the government for a redress of grievances.” is the combination of 3 of NY state bill of rights.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both represent the principles of representative democratic government, in which power originated from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement, both provide for two branches of legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate and both request a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They also both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

It outlines a plan of government and provides the structure and functioning of the institutions of governments. Constitutions are expressions of popular sovereignty between the government and the governed. It specifies the powers and limitation of power of the government, as well as the right and privileges of citizens that cannot be affected by the government. Also it specified how citizens are allowed to participate in democratic decision making processes that determines public policies. In some ways, Texas Constitution executes these functions well.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

There are many Constitutions in the U.S., all the state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. I will be writing about both the Maryland and U.S. Constitution, which have many differences and similarities. This essay is about the three similarities and differences of the Maryland and U.S. Constitution that I found. The three differences and similarities are the state constitution is reserved for state government, whereas the U.S. Constitution is reserved for the national government, “They both embody the principles of representative democratic government”, and they are different in length and structure.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

The two constitution I am gonna compare are the United States of America constitution, and the Canadian constitution. Like the U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution is mostly the same since it got many of its laws from the U.S constitution. Both constitution have many provinces that they are divided into since the place is too big, as well as to divide power, as well as that they both have an executive power since they need someway to be able to divide the power. Unlike the U.S, Canada has a Queen that controls the executive government. Canada has its own version of the Bill Of Rights called Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the end of its constitution.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

To show that there are similarities and differences you have to give examples. It became obvious that both sets of constitutions had it in their seams to protect the government and keep the people at peace. Yet a subtle

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

Another difference between the two varying constitutions is that Oklahoma 's Constitution currently holds over one hundred and fifty amendments, and is more open to additions and reductions, rather than with the U.S. Constitution, which has rarely ever been changed. Both documents also include a Bill of Rights, which dictates what basic rights the people have. A large difference between the Oklahoma and the U.S. Constitution is the fact that the state constitution highly focuses on education and the rights that go along with that. It recognized the fact that the students are to all have equal opportunities, and therefore should be allowed free education to a point. The Oklahoma Constitution also talks of the fundamental rights that every person should have: "All persons have the inherent right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

This constitution promised many things. The primary thing the constitution established was that Mexico was a republic. This was a huge step for the Mexican people. Mexico was divided into states and territories. Texas became a state with Coahuila.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Let’s begin with the very beginning The Preamble. The Missouri Constitution and United State Constitution start off with the preamble, explaining the people’s rights, as well as providing guidelines on how the government will be run. Both constitutions contain the bill of rights. The United States constitution Bill of Rights contain the first ten amendments, whereas Missouri has thirty-four sections. Together they have in common an executive, judicial, and legislative section.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

The judgment of those who have committed serious crimes is not only arguable but untrustworthy. The right to vote should not return to felons upon completing their sentence because, there is no way of knowing if the individual has since improved their character. Ex cons should have to go a certain amount time without committing any sort of crime before voting rights are restored. While some may feel not permitting felons to vote goes against the eighth amendment, not allowing them to vote is in the people’s best

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, taking away a prisoner's right to vote contradicts with the idea of imprisonment in a democratic society. The right to vote is unrelated to their crimes and is not automatically excluded when a person is imprisoned. Besides that, allowing prisoners to vote does not harm any other people. On the contrary, they might even want to help their loved ones outside of the prison. Furthermore, it gives them some feeling of what own choice-making feels like.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document