More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyse crucible by arthur miller
Literary criticism of the crucible by Arthur Miller
Comparing books and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Crucible and 12 Angry Men are both, excellent examples of instances when justice is fragile. One individual’s decision could be life or death in these cases. The only person who knows if they are guilty or not for certain is the suspect, unless there is factual proof. During jury duty, the jurors could just be focused on getting the job done so they can leave and do their evening activities. For the suspect, it was his fate.
John Garrett Rankin October 13, 2015 English III, 4th Hour Dr. Willis The Crucible The Crucible is a sensational piece of literature that was recreated in many forms. The movie The Crucible has many similarities and differences from the play version. They both portray the story very well no matter their differences.
Many people, if asked what they would prefer, would prefer to read the book instead of watching the movie. It could be because the movie will always leave some parts from the story out. It seems like directors of the movie always leave out parts from the book, only incorporating the important parts from the story. Some also say that they prefer to leave the descriptions of things in the book up to their imagination. Also, when you are reading the book, you get to read the main characters point of view on things.
In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, and in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, there exists a common theme of adultery, a sin according to the commandments of the Puritan church. The stories center around the adulterers- John Proctor in The Crucible, and Hester Prynne in The Scarlet Letter. Both are members of early Puritan communities that are known for their very devout faith. Each character shows different reactions and feelings towards the sin, and each must face different consequences. A common theme that brings the two characters together is that they are given a chance to escape their sin and move on with their lives.
There were multiple differences in the movie and the play, The Crucible. Some were small changes that not a lot of people would notice, but there were also some that completely alter some elements. What were some of these differences? Right when the movie starts, there is already a big difference.
Have you ever read a book, and thought this would be a wonderful movie? Well, that’s not always the case due to when someone watches a movie that’s based on a book, nine times out of ten they come home disappointed. Although, in certain cases, the book and the movie come close to being the same. The crucible play and movie are fairly similar in numerous aspects and one could watch the movie and understand the main points of the play.
In the play along with the movie The Crucible, John Proctor and Abigail Williams have interesting relationship bound by adultery and lies. Abigail becomes obsessed with John and will do anything to be with him. John quickly shuts down her fantasy ideas and tells her that what happened between them was a one-time thing that will never take place again and a mistake on his part. With this knowledge, she soon spends all her time plotting to get John all to herself and to make him fall in love with her, even if that means taking out John’s wife, Elizabeth. We see many examples of this forbidden relationship through their secret encounters and arguments in both examples of the story, still, there were more scenes of John and Abby alone in the movie than in the play.
When thinking about the story, “The Crucible”, there are three kinds of adaptations. There is the movie, book and play. The two that have the most similarities and differences are the book and movie adaptations. In the book, Abigail is shown as small, harmless child at first, but progressively gets worse, while in the movie, she stays the same the whole time. Although they are different, Abigail still shows evil in her in both adaptations.
Cameron Oldfield Mrs. Brincks English III 15 November, 2015 The Crucible and Red Scare Imagine being thrown in jail, blamed for something that you didn't do .The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, is a story about how certain propaganda and false accusations can ruin lives, just like in the case of the Red Scare. Although 1692 the Salem witch trials and the Red Scare were over 200 years apart, The similarities are striking. both trials used intimidation, fear, hatred, and false accusations to ruin innocent lives. Both trials resulted in terrible outcomes, with both ending with innocent people being put to death and shunned from society.
The movie, “The Crucible” has won 4 awards, and was nominated for many more. In the New Yorker magazine, Arthur Miller said “I wrote the crucible because it reflects the Communist witch hunts of their time.” Of all character John Proctor is one of the harder ones to figure out. He does some different things in the book than in the movie.
The Crucible movie and play had many differences, although only one noticeable difference changed the perception of the The Crucible. Both the movie follows the play quite closely, the major difference being the ending. The play version of The Crucible concludes with Elizabeth’s response to being told to stop her husband, John, from being hanged. Elizabeth closes out the play by saying that John chose the morally correct option and it is his choice to die as a result of that choice. The movie ends with three of the town's authority figures are kicked off the platform and hanged.
The director called Nicholas Hytner. By compare and contrast the movie and text of The Crucible, analyze the roles characters played in the Crucible and find out the purpose of director, the director has used The Crucible movie to create a very strong statement to condemn McCarthyism based on true story. There are several differences between the way the play The Crucible was written and the way it was presented in the film adaptation we watched in class. One major difference was that
“The Crucible” is a fiction story that took place in a small town called Salem in the state of Massachusetts in 1692 during the spring time. The plot of this story is about a group of girls who went into the forest led by a black slave named Tituba. They were all dancing in the forest until Reverend Parris caught them dancing in the forest and even saw one of the girl naked. Parris’s daughter Betty who was there in the forest falls into a coma-like state when Reverend Parris caught them. Reverend Parris only noticed his daughter was sick the next day and accused Abigail William, who is Reverend Parris’s niece, of witchery and caused his daughter to go into a coma-like state.
Both Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” and Harper Lee’s “To Kill A Mockingbird” are both books that present us with the theme of ‘men of conscience’. John Proctor and Atticus Finch, both fictional characters from the books, are considered to be ‘men of conscience’. A man of conscience is a man aware of the moral and ethical judgements he has a strong desire to do the right thing whenever possible. The life of these men is ruled by their desire to seek the truth and justice in the situations around them; these traits are displayed in both of the characters throughout both the novel and the play.
The threat of Communism and the Red Scare put fear of group mentality into many people during the late 1940-50s. The authors of 1984 and The Crucible used their respective works to comment on the social injustice going on in their own lives, which connects to injustice the exists throughout time anywhere in the world. Miller wrote his play, set in 1692, about Puritans and the Salem witch trials because he believed that, similar to his trial for HUAC in the 1950s, the trials in Salem were caused by false accusations and mass hysteria led by powerful individuals. In 1984, Orwell creates a world in the near future that shows group mentality and its threat to conform society with the government.
