Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays for the dropping of the atomic bomb
Essays for the dropping of the atomic bomb
Essays for the dropping of the atomic bomb
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would
Nuclear physicist Leo Scillard thought that “[the U.S.] could win the war in another six months,”(Source F) without the use of atomic weapons. This shows how the U.S was not facing the prospect of a severely prolonged war. While many believed the atomic bomb was the quickest way to end the war, there was still a quick method that did not involve endangering as many civilians. Additionally, in July of 1945 Dwight D. Eisenhower recalled that “reports indicated the imminence of Japan’s collapse”(Source C).
The Chief of Staff at the Wiesbaden Community, Colonel Weafer, owned a lovely home in Leavenworth that he wanted to rent. He also had a connection with the housing office that could get us a statement of unavailability on the post so we could rent off the post. We arrived at a beautiful home and arranged for our household goods delivery. We had three shipments; one from Germany, whole baggage waiting for delivery, and a storage shipment from my mother’s house in Phoenix.
“A world without nuclear war would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us”. These words were spoken by Margaret Thatcher who supported the thought of using atomic warfare, and she wasn’t alone in this idea. President Harry S. Tuman also believed that during WWII, the use of the newly constructed atomic bombs were a crucial move that the U.S. military needed to make. The events that occured on April 6, 1945 changed the course of the war, and the invention of “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” made nuclear warfare possible for future conflicts. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity during World War II.
On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.
The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost.
Will Rahn Mr.Haltom U.S History 5/3/24 The ruinous sentry of the Atomic Bomb August 6, 1945, prolonged tensions of WW2 between America and Japan, caused the United States Of America to employ the first use of nuclear weapons in warfare ever conceived. The atomic bomb dubbed “Little Boy” was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, a major port and military headquarters. The bombing was inflicted to avoid a prolonged conflict with Japan by forcing them to surrender to avoid casualties from both sides. The justification of Hiroshima is a complex and contentious argument debated still to the present day by historians and ethicists.
The chilling bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a hotly debated subject for many in the US because of the devastation they left behind. Two contrasting beliefs arose during the debate: Gar Alperovitz and Herbert Feis, where two historians argued for the opposing sides. Gar Alperoviz argued that there was no justification for killing the lives of pedestrians, and Herbert feis disagreed, saying that it was unavoidable and ended up saving more lives than it ended. Though both sides make pretty solid points, Gar Alperoviz’s argument is more morally and legally sensible. Alperov was a historian, economist, and a founder of the Harvard institute.
"We're at war with Japan. We were attacked by Japan. Do you want to kill Japanese, or would you rather have Americans killed? " (Adams 414). This quote by General Curtis LeMay, of the United States Military, was the question that all American's deeply considered before dropping the very first atomic bomb on Japan.
By 1945, those involved in the Second World War were exhausted. There had been millions of casualties, millions were still suffering and countries were in turmoil. After six years of war, those involved were ready for it to be over. By the end of 1944 the Axis had collapsed. Once Germany unconditionally surrendered on May 8, 1945, the Allies were hoping Japan would surrender too.
The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.
For my final paper, I would like to discuss both the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the bombing of Pearl Harbor from the perspectives of the United States and the Japanese to see if one was more successful than the other. I will go about this by examining both primary and secondary sources that discuss various aspects of each event. These aspects would include the goal of the attacker (United States for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan for Pearl Harbor), how well each bombing was actually executed by the attacker, and then what effects the bombing had on the receiving country, which could include immediate effects such as deaths and destruction, as well as long-term effects such as radiation. This last part would also include if the
August 6, 1945 has been marked as a devastating day in history. This is the day the United States dropped an unprecedented bomb on Japan, which happened to end WWII at the same time. The topic regarding the dropping of the atomic bomb has been controversial and the decision to drop the bomb has been scrutinized to weather it was a necessity or a morality. This leads us to our next question: did Truman really make the decision to drop the atomic bomb? We have been taught through our history books that the atomic bomb was the fastest way to end the war and save the country from millions of causalities.
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki In an attempt to end World War II early, Harry Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to save thousands of American lives at any cost. It has been categorized as the current deadliest bomb at that time, bringing terror to everyone and killing about 220,000 people, most of them innocent in both cities combined. During the war, the U.S. had lost a few battles against Japan, also losing thousands of American lives. And if the U.S. wouldn’t have dropped that bomb who knows maybe thousands of more American lives could have been lost and god knows when World War II would end.
The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.