ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

642 Words3 Pages

The Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists There are two sides to every story, this includes the ratification of the Constitution. There were the people that were for ratification of the Constitution called Federalists, and there were people against it called Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were one first political parties in the United States. They wanted a strong central government, to promote economic development and public improvements. To get more support on ratification of the constitution, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay all wrote a total of 85 essays that were put together in a book called The Federalist. Hamilton wrote 50 essays, Madison wrote 30 and Jay wrote the rest. In Hamilton essays, he wanted to get rid of the fear that Americans had with political power. Hamilton also stated that the Constitution had created “the perfect balance between liberty and power”. There are many points that Hamilton and Madison writes in their essay. In Federalist No. 68 Hamilton writes that putting the leadership of the country in one person hands was not dangerous. In Federalist No. 70, Hamilton argued that it would be easier to control one president than to control many presidents. …show more content…

They believed that the Constitution gave the government too much power and if the government had too much power then they would be back to where they started with the same monarchy as Britain. The Anti-Federalist lacked the leadership power compared to the Federalists. Some Anti-Federalist included Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry. Anti-Federalists said that the new government would fall because of merchants and creditors. Anti-Federalist who opposed the Constitution believed that the Constitution failed to protect the rights of citizens and threatened liberties. Many Anti-Federalists that wrote against the ratification of the Constitution used pseudonyms such as Centinel, Brutus, and Federal

Show More
Related

Federalism Vs Ratification Dbq

138 Words | 1 Pages

The framers of the constitution presented their work to the states for ratification. To become law of the land, nine states had to approve it. However, two groups with different opinions formed in each state. Supporters of the constitution were called Federalists whose leaders, such as John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, wrote a series of essays called the Federalist Papers. Those in opposition of the constitution called themselves Anti-Federalists.

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Amending The Constitution

490 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-Federalists were a political group who did not support the Constitution and a

Read More

Ratification Debate Anti-Federalists Vs. The Constitution

100 Words | 1 Pages

During the ratification debate, Anti-Federalists were opposed to the Constitution. They argued that the newer system threatened liberties of the people, and failed to protect individual rights of Americans on a general scale. The Anti-Federalists weren 't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction of Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because they believed stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states in their entirety; Others argued that centralized government would have identical characteristics of the monarchical properties of Great Britain which they fought to sever themselves from prior. While others feared that a new government threatened personal liberties.

Read More

Dbq Essay

426 Words | 2 Pages

It is interesting to see the effect these groups had on the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists had multiple issues with the Constitution getting ratified. One objective they were concerned with was the strength and role of the federal government this would create. They thought that the government would eventually take their rights away and abuse the power.

Read More

Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise

520 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution was to be ratified by a special ratifying convention instead of the state legislature. The people fought hard for ratification of the Constitution for a long time. Those who supported the ratification were called Federalists, and those who opposed it were called Anti-Federalists. The Federalists went against the Articles of Confederation, whereas the Anti-Federalists supported a House of Representative which consisted of substantive power. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, whom are all Federalists, wrote The Federalist Papers - a series of essays.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Vs Hamilton Essay

476 Words | 2 Pages

He especially favored the creation of a national bank. He also wanted the federal government to have the authority to collect taxes. Hamilton, along with John Jay and James Madison, wrote many of The Federalist Papers which were essays that explained why the the states should ratify, or accept, a new

Read More

Roger Sherm The Ingenious Idea Of The Great Compromise

1606 Words | 7 Pages

Those who supported the Constitution were known as Federalists, while the opposing side were termed Anti-Federalists. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and strong leaders (like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin), while Anti-Federalists consisted mostly of farmers and lower class citizens (such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry). The Federalists simply could not believe the virtue of man was a strong and reliable enough foundation for a government, so they rooted for a structure of checks and balances. They levied for a strong, central government that contained the majority of the power over the states. Anti-Feds believed such a government would create a tyranny, so the states should retain most of the supremacy.

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Give More Power To The Government Than The States

677 Words | 3 Pages

When the United States of America began to fight the Revolutionary War in 1775, they would need a governing body to run the new country. However, seeing as they had just escaped from a tyrannical government under England, the Articles of Confederation gave the states a very large amount of power so that they would not have the same problem again. However, although this government gave many states what they wanted, it was not strong enough to run a country. So, when writing a new Constitution the founding fathers gave more power to the federal government than the states because of the former government.

Read More

The Constitutional Convention: Executive Summary

832 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist believed that once the Federal Government had more power the problems with the nation's debt would be handled better (Diffen.com, n.d.). The anti-federalist was against the ratification of the Constitution and did not want the government to have more control over them (Diffen.com, 2016). They were also against having a president out of fear of tyranny and preferred individual states to handle their affairs (Diffen.com, 2016). They did not feel comfortable with ratifying the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was added (Diffen.com).

Read More

How Did The Federalists Encourage The States To Ratifying The Constitution

641 Words | 3 Pages

The ratification of the U.S. Constitution process included debates and discussions to convince citizens to approve of the new Constitution. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists played a huge part in the topic of the Constitution. The Federalists were people who supported the Constitution and wanted a strong central government, highlighting the necessity for a unified government. Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification, fearing that a central government will be too powerful and will jeopardize the protection of individual liberties in the Bill of Rights. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Patrick Henry were key figures who played a part in molding the state rights, federalism, and balance of power.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

521 Words | 3 Pages

Anti-Federalists are those who are against the ratification of the Constitution because, they fear having a strong national government that would overpower the states. They are mainly state’s rights advocates as they remain loyal to their state governments. Additionally, they are generally poorer than the Federalists. Anti-Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation was a good enough plan that did not need any modification. They believed the Constitution lacked the protection of basic political rights, and did not give any significant power to the states.

Read More

Decisions Drafted By The Anti-Federalists And The Ratification Of The Constitution

532 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison published the Federalist Papers to influence the public and push for the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalist Papers did this by addressing concerns and objections by the Anti-Federlist. The papers addressed federalism and separation of power, the need for a strong executive, the protection of liberties, and concerns about the Bill of Rights. James Madison was a key figure in drafting the Constitution, playing a significant role in proposing and ensuring the Bill of Rights. Anti-federalists like Patrick Henry and George Mason advocated for an amendment to the Constitution.

Read More

Assess The Difference Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

543 Words | 3 Pages

They felt that the constitution did not create a fair government, but a controlling government. They were scared that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their rights and freedom. They were scared because some would take over their rights. The Anti- Federalist came together and created the Bill of rights and proposed it to the constitution to make sure the citizens were secure by law. They wanted everyone to be heard, not overruled.

Read More

Assess The Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

537 Words | 3 Pages

In fact, federalists and anti-federalists stood on a totally different ground. Actually, the opposition initially raised from the part of anti-federalists who argued that they could not ratify the Constitution which provided the national government and legislative organs with too much power and decreased the role of local communities. To put it more precisely, they argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government at the expanse of the state governments to the extent that the opinion of the local community could be potentially ignored by the central government under certain circumstances.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

Open Document