Compare And Contrast George Bush And Dukakis's Election

632 Words3 Pages

The two major political party candidates from the election of 1988 is George Bush and Michael Dukakis.The political positions that the candidate George Bush held before seeking presidency was being a vice president for President Ronald Reagan and for Dukakis he was a governor for Massachusetts.The more liberal candidate was Dukakis because he was a democrat and the more conservative was Bush because he was a republican. Dukakis was more challenged by people in his own party during the primary election because the democrats thought that their party would need to win it all also they refused renomination.Since the Democrats had lost the 1984 presidential election, the Democrats in 1985 and 1986 were happy to find a new way to win the presidency.That 's why they made the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to help out on Dukakis’s election.

The main issues in this campaign was abortion, recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools and prison furlough programs. Dukakis responded by saying that he was a "proud liberal".The Dukakis party tried to blame Bush for some of the scandals of the Reagan administration, such as Iran-Contra affair. Getting into that info made him almost the same level of power as Ronald Reagan. …show more content…

The popular and the electoral votes yielded the same results because George won both of them. One of the factors played into these results was that more states where republican than democratic at that time so that changed.The second thing that factors the votes was the age differences for voting more republican equals the more voters at the voting age less democratic equals less voters. To vote for a third-party candidate that means to throw your vote away. By not voting for one of the candidates who might win, you take a vote away from one of the legitimate