ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Hunter Gatherers And Agriculturalists

484 Words2 Pages

Hunter gatherer/ Agriculturalist essay Hunter gatherers and agriculturalists are different and the same in some ways. Their population is the basically the same because there was never that many people. They had the men do the work mainly. Neither one of them didn't have much technology at the beginning. They didn't have much technology because they didn't have many people to work on it. They always got sick from the dust and stuff because it wasn't good for their health. Then they would die off and then they'd get less people. Hunter gatherers and agriculturalists population was never big. They both didn’t have a lot of people. The men mainly would work on technology and have health issues. Men usually died off pretty easy. The women could die off pretty easy too, The women could have health issues or be pregnant, it would …show more content…

They didn't have many doctors to cure them. They were sometimes healthy and they sometimes were not. They had medicine and sometimes got cured. If they would find food they would be healthy and eat well and helped out and then they would do good. Some of them didn't find much food and their health would get bad and they'd die of starvation and then their population would go down. Agriculturalists were usually healthy because they would grow crops and have food and eat a diverse diet and same thing with the hunter gatherers except they didn't have a big topic of food to choose from. Hunter gatherers and agriculturalists have okay things. They have what they need and that's good enough for them. Their different in some ways and the same in other ways. They live good for their lives. They had a good population, good technology, and good health. They got stronger and some got weaker. We wouldn't have technology and know what medicine and good things to use to help us if it wasn't for them. Hunter gatherers and agriculturalists have a lot of connections in different ways. They were good

Show More
Related
721 Words | 3 Pages

This made transportation and trading easier. The second development was that they built granaries. These granaries supplied the people with a stable supply of food and it made food cheaper. The third contribution was that

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

They made strong iron plows that made farming more efficient. They also made a wheelbarrow. That made it easier to push heavy

Read More
1156 Words | 5 Pages

On the other hand, The Inca Empire was an empire based in the Andes mountains. The Inca empire required very similar innovations. Because of their mountainous land, flat land capable of being farmed on was non-existent. Also, because of the long length

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

Farming was useful for crops like wheat but corn, pumpkin and beans were planted because they were able to grow in the poor soil they had.

Read More
1229 Words | 5 Pages

They were starving and had little supplies

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

They had to work hard living for years and still traverse large amounts of land in an acceptable amount of time. And sometimes they had to work silently because like bears and stuff and they probably got very good at it by the

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

It kept our population and consumption in check. Our modern culture does not know how to live. As Ishmael says “trial and error is a good way to learn to fly but not a good way to build a civilization.” Ishmael talks about how when humans started agricultural lifestyle we didn't have the knowledge to do it with the limits of our earth. The lessons learned from 3 million years on this earth were pushed aside to begin a new way of living.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

Neolithic Era This Neolithic Era was a much easier era for the people in it than the Paleolithic Era. These people had a much easier time finding food, which meant they had a higher surplus of it. They had an easier time mostly because they learned to farm and grow crops instead of always going to hunt. They could grow crops because the earth was more warm and green with more vegetation and animals because The Great Thaw happened in between the Paleolithic and Neolithic Era.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

The problem was that there was not the right terrain for farming. WIthout farming it is very hard to have a steady food supply for the growing nation. This caused a need for innovation and caused the invention of terrace farming. Without people settling around mountains and hills in early civilzations, the practice of terrace farming may have never been created, and civilizations may have never been able to settle on or around these kinds of terrains. This would have vastly changed the world with less land to settle and create society, and it may have caused even more conflict in the world because without the option of settling on or around hills and mountains being available, the same civilizations that would have settled there would be packed closer together in a smaller space.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

They were not yet a civilization, but contributed to many ideas that led to a civilization. Nomads are people that move from place to place, hunting and gathering their food. One of their intellectual achievements was making tools that helped them survive. For example, they made spears out of wood, bone, or stone so they can kill the animals when they see them. One of the nomads cultural achievements

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

With farming, most seasons are predictable, and so more food comes with a steady supply guarantee, even if only for part of a year. Animals that were domesticated could also be relied on for plowing crops, carrying heavy things, and transporting goods long distances. This pushed the Neolithic Revolution forward because civilization began to get more usage out of the different things it learned to grow and domesticate. This was dangerous, because once humans began treating things as possessions, violence could ensue. Since the food supply also played a part directly with nature, this could cause for religion to develop even more.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

MLDA 21 to 18 When the MLDA 21 act is considered to be for the greater good, that is not always the case. The law was enacted to make the life of an average teenager easier, but instead it just put more restriction on their freedom. When there is restriction in the life of a teenager, then comes rebellion against this act and that improves their likelihood of drinking alcohol. Age 18 is when teenagers start receiving their civil and mandatory responsibilities. So, since it is legal to lay your life down for your country, shouldn’t you be able to drink at the same age.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

Although they didn’t understand the concept of germs, they understood that dirt caused disease. Therefore, they lived in clean places, away from swamps and other places with bad smells. and had toilets to lead their waste away, instead of dumping it in the streets, and made sure it was possible for even the poor to

Read More
1305 Words | 6 Pages

Was the Agricultural Revolution Good for Humanity? 10,000 years ago, humans underwent a dramatic shift in lifestyle. For the majority of their existence, humans were hunter-gatherers. As defined by Carol Ember, professor of history at Yale University, hunter-gatherers were nomadic foragers who hunt and gather food rather than farm it (Ember 2). Even today, hunter-gatherer societies still exist.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Tending to crops took less time than hunting and gathering food so humans used

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Hunter Gatherers And Agriculturalists

Related Topics

Open Document