More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about Malcolm X biography
The autobiography of malcolm x summary essays
Essay about Malcolm X biography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peaceful resolution, where Malcolm X believed in creating a revolution. In both stories, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. communicate their stance on racism
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr's techniques are very different, but similar. They both want the same thing: negro companies. The way they carry out this, though, is different. Malcolm wants to make his own negro company. Furthermore, Martin wants to protest peacefully by banning products from companies that do not hire negroes.
Malcolm X on the other hand was trying to strengthen the African American economies, and was less focused on getting the support of whites as well as blacks. Because of this, his philosophy wasn’t as good as Martin Luther
They disapproved of their race being mistreated by the whites, so they stood up for their people. By comparing and contrasting Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., people can get information about the two and learn how they had similar goals. An examination of the similarities and differences between the two is that they gave great speeches about their thoughts on segregation and how they wanted their people to have a fair life in society. However, they both have different tactics to get their freedom of being treated fairly.
Malcolm X wanted separate schools which colored kids went to but also created by colored people. Malcolm X did not like the idea of people coming together. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had very different ideas and opinions. Martin Luther king's philosophy is better because it gives colored kids an opportunity to learn what other kids are
For example, Sir King always followed a non-violent way to solve problems, while Sir Malcolm X always chose a way that equality can be achieved in any way if it is necessary, which means he approved of being violent. It is mostly because they have grown up with completely different social backgrounds. However, M.L. King saw the world from a good perspective to win equal rights for his people, while Sir Malcolm X saw the world in timid anger and from a revengeful perspective. In my opinion, I believe the procedure of how Martin Luther King protested is the best way to win equal rights. He always chose peace over
Martin luther king and Malcolm X were two well known speakers. But there has always been the same question being asked around, whose philosophy is better? Mlk is a supporter of non violence. So is Malcolm X, but his beliefs are a little different than Martin Luther King 's. Malcolm x does not like violence but he does encourage it when the other party starts the disagreement. Mlks believes if the other party has started it you do not fight or hurt them.
Malcolm X doesn’t show that same attitude as Martin Luther King Jr. Malcolm X fights more for an African-American community that is independent. (doc G). X’s intended focus is having an independent community because he no longer wants to be in boy scouts just for African-Americans to get jobs when they can get a job in his envisioned community.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X held significantly different opinions about how to advance African-Americans in American society. Malcolm X believed in the use of force to accomplish goals, whereas King supported nonviolent means. The differences between the two leaders can be explained by their differing political views, upbringings, and beliefs. First of all, King believed the best strategy for achieving change was nonviolence.
While, Malcolm X is still regarded as controversial. Both leaders changed the landscape for Civil Rights, but Martin Luther King Jr.’s teachings have grown to become a universal method in combating
Malcolm’s evolution from Black Nationalism toward socialism from his observations of the colonial world and his analysis of modern history, he had begun to bring up situations between two movements and seek a synthesis of the revolutionary nationalist and socialist aspects of the freedom struggle. I believe that Martin Luther King Jr. was a more effective leader because he did more speeches and protest. He also helped pass laws in America. He also helped create racial equality in a peaceful manner by using a powerful voice instead of violence. I also believe that he had a bigger crowd supporting him throughout the civil rights movement.
However, the action should be taken without nonviolence and with peaceful protest. Dr. King’s nonviolent tactic was a success as it bridged the gap between the colored and white people. Malcolm X was renown for his act of self defense throughout the Civil Rights Movement. His main goal was to prove how whites did not treat black people as human beings. However, through Malcolm X’s several tactics, Martin Luther King’s movement was made more impactful and successful.
The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so
Martin Luther King’s views helped create a better environment for every race and I really think his political views and strategies were more efficient than Malcolm
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both civil rights activist during the civil rights movement. Both activists gave speeches to large audiences and became very well known across the country. Both activists believed that they should have a program that will teach their philosophies. Although they both wanted to have programs teaching their beliefs, the beliefs they wanted to teach were different. Martin Luther King Jr.’s program would be focused on teaching people how to nonviolently campaign, while Malcolm X’s program would be focused on educating people how the government was working, or rather not working, during this time of civil injustice.
