ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

572 Words3 Pages

“Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals” - Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. was more peaceful during the Civil Rights Time Period than Malcolm X for three main reasons: the first reason is Malcolm X was less peaceful was he was apart of a couple violent groups, the second reason is Malcolm X did not agree with peaceful demonstrations, and the third reason is Malcolm X encouraged his followers to rise-up against the whites. The first reason Martin Luther King Jr. was more peaceful than Malcolm X is Malcolm X was apart of a couple violent groups. One of the first groups Malcolm X was a part of was the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X was in prison for around 8 years for robbery. During his time in prison he learned more about the Nation of Islam and when he got out of prison he joined the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X later traveled to Mecca and learned that any race could be muslim and left the Nation of Islam because he believed they were not true muslims. Malcolm X was later assassinated by members of the Nation of Islam. Another group Malcolm X was apart of was the Afro-American Unity. This group was founded by Malcolm X and was not …show more content…

was more peaceful than Malcolm X during Civil Rights is Malcolm X did not agree with peaceful demonstrations. Malcolm X believed that peaceful demonstrations would not achieve equality between black and whites. He believed blacks needed to show action and fight back physically before they could attain equality. Malcolm X was even willing to keep black and whites separate because it could encourage people to want to change and achieve equality. Martin Luther King Jr. had a different views on achieving equality. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that through peaceful demonstrations and protests that whites would realize that blacks are the same as

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X was not in favor of violence but he said that non-violence should not be taught only to the black. Malcolm said that he didn't see anyone teaching the Ku Klux Klan about stopping

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

I agree with Jackie Robinsons method of civil disobedience even though he knows he can never be non-violent. I do not agree with Malcolm X and the nation of Islam approach because it is more violent and aggressive even though they do not want to live together with whites. I believe that the civil rights movement was about making a change for African Americans and the only way to make a change is through nonviolent acts. The civil rights movement was to make a change and Malcolm X and the nation of Islam's approach would have caused more problems than solved any for African Americans. Malcolm X believed that blacks should live separately from white's and he called it separation.

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

Kaiden Zeleznikar Mrs. Coleman English III 3 May 2023 STF Essay During the Civil Rights movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. fought to end racism through peaceful protests. All of the Americans were there listening to King persuade everyone to act with non-violence. King is very firm and confident about his speech of nonviolence resistance.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

Malcolm X, who had come from a poor home in the North, had focused on the economic aspect of the Civil Rights movement through more violent take on getting his word out. Martin Luther King Jr was a major influence to the Civil Rights movement. Therefore, his non-violent

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

In the book “No Crystal Stair”, many people were motivated by Malcolm X’s philosophy “by any means necessary” more than Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy. The way I see the Civil Rights Movement, society moves forward farther using violence. A nonviolent approach was not a good as a violent approach because violence was the key to the Civil Rights Movement. Also, Lewis Michaux, the main character, supports Malcolm X’s philosophy a little more than Martin Luther King Jr’s. Reasons being that it made the black community more brave, made them grow and fight for what they believe in, and nonviolence lead to death.

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X wanted to improve the lives of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to use an aggressive approach, but Malcolm X wanted to use his words to get through to his community. Although neither of them agreed with the other's ideas and goals, they both wanted to fight for the same reason, African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, and he thought using a nonviolent arsenal weapon, like boycotting, and believed it would help create peace with all races. The text says, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott."

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X go down in history as the most prominent figures of the civil rights movement. Although they are often put against each other because of their different approaches, they were similar in several ways, such as their ability to make crowds grasp on to their words and follow their lead. So the question to be asked is not whether Dr King or Malcolm X was better, more moral, or logical, but what about them was so alluring to the masses that trusted them as leaders in the movement. Both Martin Luther King jr. and Malcolm X manipulated the emotions of audiences through powerful rhetorical methods, but applied them in different ways.

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

However, the nonviolent protests and endeavors employed by African Americans in the 1960s caught the attention of individuals nationwide. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s refusal to react violently showed white Americans that African Americans were not subhuman creatures prone to violence, but humans capable of intelligence and reason. African Americans were not animals capable of only slave labor, but individuals deserving of the rights promised by the Constitution of the United States to all American citizens. In addition to the aforementioned pieces of evidence, Martin Luther King believed that violence would never lead to peace, only to more violence. He was firm and justified in his affirmation that “This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X doesn’t show that same attitude as Martin Luther King Jr. Malcolm X fights more for an African-American community that is independent. (doc G). X’s intended focus is having an independent community because he no longer wants to be in boy scouts just for African-Americans to get jobs when they can get a job in his envisioned community.

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X grew up in a much lesser community. His neighborhood was violent and there wasn’t much schooling. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, throughout his entire lifetime and believed using nonviolent forms of protest. King would even condone being nonviolent when he was hurt physically. Malcolm X used whatever form of protest he needed to get the job done and

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

He had a difficult childhood and converted to Islam “while in prison for robbery from 1946 to 1952.” He was born in Omaha, Nebraska as Malcolm

Read More
1690 Words | 7 Pages

should have acted differently to work with Malcolm X, and possibly change the time period the Civil Rights Act was established. Martin had all the right words to say to keep whites and government officials from being completely against everything he had to say. Although, Martin did not have enough action steps to establish equal rights, Malcolm X certainly does. Consequently, it is likely that Malcolm X was an example of how to protest in an effective way. If Martin Luther King Jr. was more demanding and forceful like Malcolm X, the Civil Rights Act could have been established years before it was.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

Related Topics

Open Document