ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

910 Words4 Pages

Two of the most significant individuals are Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. During the American civil rights movement. Although the two leaders had distinct ways of combating structural racism and injustice, King's theory ultimately prevails over Malcolm X's. The references discussed why King's perspective is superior to Malcolm X's, especially in terms of bringing about long-lasting change. The two leaders' approaches to nonviolence were one of their most significant distinctions.
Malcolm X believed in using force to struggle against oppression, unlike King, who supported nonviolent resistance. Study results, however, imply that King's nonviolent strategy was more successful in bringing about long-lasting change. In contrast to violent resistance, nonviolent …show more content…

This is due to the fact that, while violence can be used to justify additional tyranny, nonviolent resistance appeals to the moral conscience of both those in authority and the general public. This was acknowledged by King, who wrote in his well-known Letter from Birmingham Jail that "violence, as a way of achieving racial justice, is both impractical and immoral" (Morant, 2019). Therefore, King's adherence to nonviolence was not only a moral decision but also a calculated one. King's emphasis on coalition-building distinguishes his philosophy from Malcolm X's in another way. King understood that in order to make a significant change, it would have the support of not only Black Americans but also White Americans and other marginalized groups. Malcolm X, on the other hand, had a more exclusive stance, concentrating only on the empowerment of Black Americans. For Black Americans who

Show More
Related
971 Words | 4 Pages

This book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

He also believed in the use of force to achieve equality. Malcolm X was effective in his approach because he spoke to the anger and frustration that many African Americans felt. He gave them a sense of hope and empowerment. Martin Luther King,

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

in the 1950s through the 1960s, there was social and political injustice. There was also racism, but leaders such as Dr. King and Malcome X were both heroes in the civil rights movement. Malcolm X is the leader whose methods and messages work the best. Malcolm X was a civil rights leader that was good at his job and took it very seriously; he did not like to play games and was straight to the point. In paragraph one, Malcolm X states, " I'm not here to discuss anything we differ about because it time for us to submerge our differences.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout America’s history there has been many influential leaders who have strived to make a difference. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both became key figures during the Civil Rights Movement. Each of their religious beliefs influenced them to stand up and demand a change. Although these two men differed in religious beliefs, their faith helped guide them into the strong, substantial leaders they became. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of faith.

Read More
3143 Words | 13 Pages

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X held very different views on the efficiency and morality of nonviolence as the main strategy of the Civil Rights Movement. King believed that nonviolence was not only a morally superior tactic but a strategic one because it was capable of winning over public opinion and effecting long social

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

However, the action should be taken without nonviolence and with peaceful protest. Dr. King’s nonviolent tactic was a success as it bridged the gap between the colored and white people. Malcolm X was renown for his act of self defense throughout the Civil Rights Movement. His main goal was to prove how whites did not treat black people as human beings. However, through Malcolm X’s several tactics, Martin Luther King’s movement was made more impactful and successful.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

During the civil rights movement in the 1960’s two amazing leaders appeared armed with ideas, hopes, and desires that will change the way of life for an African America. The two men were Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. Both wanted the same price but they had different means in getting that same price. Although both men had some amazing and truthful points, only one was the most convincing to me. The most convincing to me was Dr. King. Dr. King was convincing to me because of the way he talked to the people, and thought them to lead a nonviolent civil rights movement.

Read More
1698 Words | 7 Pages

The fight for equality has been a long and complicated battle. Many people believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. was correct in his approach, but others believe that Malcolm X’s approach was best. Malcolm X believed in the goal of black people separating completely from white people using the method of violence in self-defense. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in the method of reaching equality through desegregation using the method of nonviolent resistance. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in very different viewpoints regarding the solution to the needs of and problems facing the African-American community in the 1960s, but King’s approach was best.

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

The Civil Rights movement led to the emergence of two historical African-American figures during the 1960s, being Martin Luther King Jr. and his rival, Malcolm X. While both men shared a common goal of achieving civil rights for their people, their approaches to reaching this goal were vastly different. Malcolm X advocated for a more confrontational and violent approach, while Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peace and nonviolence. Differing factors such as speed, duration, and tactics separated the two methods from one another. Both were effective in their own ways, though it’s clear that Malcolm X had the stronger approach to the matter. To start things off, it’s clear that Malcolm X’s approach would provide quicker results.

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout King’s entire ministry, he was always against violence; even when he was personally attacked both physically and verbally. On the other hand, Malcolm X believed in fighting back physically and aggressively. He acted on his beliefs that whatever had to be done to achieve freedom whether violently or nonviolently should be acted upon to implement change. Although King and Malcolm X address different groups of people, they both use similar strategies and have similar

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Malcolm has more justification for the black rights movement than just arguing about the variable of time, he also states that without African Americans the United States wouldn 't have its riches or status. This is all based on the idea that without slavery and generations of black workers, America would never have evolved into the prosperous

Read More
1582 Words | 7 Pages

Avenues to Political and Social Transformation: Dr. Martin Luther King vs. Malcolm X Assignment in Leadership for Public Policy Offered By – Mr. Raju Arumugham By Anna Salome Dunna MPP 08/2014 Master of Public Policy National Law School of India University Bangalore – 560072 Introduction Leadership, the most sought after quality these days is an attitude that manifests in our day to day behaviour. The objective of this assignment is to analyse how the attitude of leadership was manifested in the behaviour of two of the world renowned leaders of Civil Rights Movement that discouraged repression and discrimination of African Americans. Both Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as leaders of the oppressed about the same time in the history of Civil Rights Movement and through their efforts tried to stimulate a political and social transformation. They

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

Related Topics

Open Document