ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Nationalism And Sectionalism

599 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Factors of nationalism and sectionalism

Both nationalism and sectionalism emerged after the War of 1812. Nationalism grew in the United States because of the victory at New Orleans. Americans were proud to be called Americans. America might have seemed like they were united; however, they were divided also by a growing belief of sectionalism. Sectionalism spread like a disease, affecting the minds of Americans. Nationalism and sectionalism may be beliefs, but they grew to be great importance to Americans in this period of America. Nationalism of course is of greater importance in the economy than sectionalism was. Nationalism is the sense of belief of feeling united as one; like how Americans felt during the 1810s. In document 1 it states “ Our country! In her intercouse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but our country, right or wrong”. This means that even though …show more content…

Sectionalism is the sense of belief of feeling divided like on a subject or into factions. In document 5 it states “would have produced a new union of thirteen or fourteen states, unpolluted with slavery”. This is an example of nationalism because the author, John Quincy Adams, was against the topic of slavery. He was not thinking for his country. He was thinking about how this would have affected him. In document 6 it showed us what thomas Jefferson thought on the topic of the Missouri compromise. He was just like John Quincy Adams. He was not thinking of his county but of himself. The debate on slavery been a problem since the world switched from slaves to indentured servants. The debate of slavery has separated a lot of people to both sides of the argument. This shows the people of America were not in a sense of feeling united. They was not always united on everything. They were in different groups on some subjects. That is why sectionalism is a problem in America. They need to believe they are united so they can try to better the whole nation instead of

Show More
Related
670 Words | 3 Pages

As proposed by Wichita State University, “Settlers from both northern and southern states flocked to the region, in part to create pro- or anti-slavery groups large enough to shape the statehood process”(Price, Jay), which influenced the idea of sectionalism through the U.S.. Slavery became economic, and less about every man’s equal right. Stated by Wichita State University, “A community that considered itself "pro-slavery" was connected culturally to the southern United States. A community that adopted an "anti-slavery" or "Free-soil" tone connected itself to the northern United States”.(Price, Jay) Many citizens who were loyal to their section of the country, referred to as “Sectionalism”, wanted to be heard and wanted to react in other ways to bring attention among themselves.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

“The policy of this country ought to be…to nationalize our country, so that we shall love our country,” states Senator John Sherman in Document B. Throughout the years of 1860-1876, several events occurred, that were said to have “amounted in a revolution” over time. Complete succession of South Carolina from the Union in December of 1860 led a trail of states to leave over the course of time, leading to issues for the Union. Equal rights and privileges, and power of the federal government became topics that most often created enormous debates in these chaotic 17 years. The United States had a lack of nationality and obviously there was lack of unity. All of this chaos built up and effected the way America was managed.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

Thesis Both Nationalism and Sectionalism developed concurrently during the Era of Good Feelings. The two main reasons why nationalism increased was because of Henry Clay’s American System and Monroe’s policy to increase nationalism. Clay’s AS created a better national infrastructure that tightened America together. Monroe’s policy was to promote national unity and America’s power, which strengthens nationalism.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

To give the period after the War of 1812 the name of “Era of Good Feelings” would be somewhat-inaccurate. America’s victory in the war surely did unite the states and brought upon some “good feelings” such as unity and growth as a thriving nation, but these good feelings were not all that came out of the war. The states were heavily separated even after the war with conflicts amongst each other and within themselves. Examples of America’s sectionalism come from their social, political, and economic differences, all in which pertain to distrust between the northern and southern parts of the country. Despite all of this, however, there is no denying that there was a sense of pride and togetherness during this time period.

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

Sectionalism The definition of the word sectionalism is the restriction of interest to a narrow sphere. There were 3 main sections that practiced sectionalism in the 1800s. These sections were the North, the South, and the West. A few events that created sectional conflict were tariffs, slavery, representation, and states rights.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Because Missouri was a “slave state” that did not secede from the Union, many of the residents had a deeply divided view of the

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

In document E we see the rise of Anti-Slave Societies. These societies are tied around the abolishment of slavery and they want to establish them all across the country evidence for this claim is this quote,”We shall organize Anti-Slave societies, if possible in every town, village, and city in our land. ”This quote shows the need to unite the land towards anti-slavery. In document H we have another example of the need to reunite the nation. This is shown in a quote from David Wilmot where he gives a speech fighting for equal rights between blacks and whites.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The Era of Not So Good Feelings Many historians label the period after the War of 1812 as the “Era of Good Feelings” but it certainly did not seem that way towards many others. This so called “Era of Good Feelings” dealt with the extension of slavery and the differing views on that subject between the North and the South, the American System that helped the United States industrialize and expand but led the country from nationalism to new sectionalism views; thus causing tensions to rise. Slavery had been protracted since the 1600s and with the extension of slavery and many differing views from both the Northerners and Southerners, it became a huge issue. Northerners opposed the extension of slavery because of the 3/5 Compromise which provided unfair representation to slave states compared to the northern states.

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

This shows that there was a balance that had to be found. Some of the topics they debated on where topics such as the president 's salary and how to prevent against sectional favoritism. The largest topic, however, was on how the president should be elected. One of the first struggles the men encountered was on who should elect the president. There were two sides, the supporters of the legislative branch electing the president and the supporters of popular vote.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

In the 1800’s the newly formed country was split into Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalist were those who were supportive of the growth of the government towards a stronger federal government and agreed upon the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-federalist were those who did not support the growth of the government and did not agree with the ratification of the Constitution. When talking about the indifference people felt about the purchasing of the Louisiana Territory it is said that, “Members of the Federalist Party, already a significant minority in both houses of Congress, worried that the Louisiana Purchase would further reduce their clout” (Jesse Greenspan). In other words, the Federalists were worried they would lose their already set status when it came to society and the political world.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Between 1800 and 1850, western expansion played a major role in the sectional tensions between the North and South in America. Most of this would stem from whether or not new territory would be free or slave states. Later on, there would be compromises in place to alleviate the tension but disunity between the North and South was very prevalent. In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase from the French got a rise out of the New England Federalist party.

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

Another argument for the national government by the Federalists was evidenced in the Federalist 10 by James Madison. Madison, having a negative view of factions, stated that “there are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction: the one, by destroying its causes; the other, by controlling its effects” (Madison 1787, 52). Despite his disparaging view on factions, Madison stressed its necessity as “liberty is to faction what air is to fire, an aliment

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

In this edition of the Federalist papers, Alexander Hamilton stresses over and over again the importance of unity between the states. Without unity, it seems as though our country will cease to exist as we know it. While Hamilton does not come right out and state, we need unity, he does make his point very clear. In using the Constitution as the perfect example of what the United States needed at the time, Hamilton manages to bring everything back to one central theme. We cannot have unity between the states if we do not introduce the Constitution.

Read More
1668 Words | 7 Pages

The foundation of Southern nationalism was its unique southern regional identity. This identity was built on factors such as climate, geography, economic development, and cultural values. The institution of slavery, however,

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

loyalty to your state or lifestyle rather than to the whole country. The north was against sectionalism and the south liked it. The North wanted the government to rule laws for the whole country and south wanted to have each state choose their own laws individually. south also wanted to return any runaway slaves. (Mrs. Wise) "the Fugitive

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Nationalism And Sectionalism

Related Topics

Open Document