ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Persian Empire Vs Roman Empire

529 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Rome and persian empires differences

When we think of the two large and power empires that experienced many interesting and salient occurrences, they are going to be the Persian Empire and the Roman Empire. The Persian Empire and the Roman Empire ended up with some noticeable similarities that were their tolerance to other people’s beliefs and their regional governments. First of all, because of their expansions, they were both very multicultural, and the two empires confronted a large numbers of diversity of ethnicities, cultures, and religions. Therefore, as long as they wouldn’t rebel and paid taxes, the convenient way to maintain the empires’ peace and stability was to allow conquered people to keep living in their own lives. For example, especially Greek, in the 200s …show more content…

Their empires were enlarged rapidly, and it was difficult to control by a central governor, so they were divided into provinces that were managed by some governors. For instance, with the Roman Empire, in 27 B.C, the agreement between Augustus and the Senate about governance for provinces. The senate controlled some provinces that were not threatened by any situation, and Augustus would rule the remainder (Gale, EVANS, J. A. S). On the other hand, the Persian Empire’s traditional title was “king of kings” that meant the king was still ruling the entire empire, but the Persian Empire had their own Satrapies and Satraps. At the beginning of the reign of Darius the Great, there were only 20 satrapies, and this amount was rapidly increasing at the time the empire was developing (Gale, Persian Empire). There is a proverb in our country: “A stranger nearby is better than a far-away relative,” so these methods would be effective in order to control the empires. In conclusion, the Persian Empire and the Roman Empire had many noticeable similarities, but the most two important issues that I was interested in were the attitudes to their population and the regionalization of

Show More
Related
459 Words | 2 Pages

By improving the already strong Persian military, he places the empire at a higher place than surrounding civilizations, A strong army means having less worry about attacks, allowing the empire to focus on other things such as education and economy. It also presents a threat to other countries and empires and sets Persia on higher ground. Document 5 explains that a branch of the Persian military, the spies, would survey Satraps and other surrounding civilizations, to insure that they didn't form alliances with other groups and become powerful enough to defeat the empire. It is important to know where your opponents stand at all times, which is why having people keeping watch on the Satraps brings a big advantage to Persia. This helps prevent the Satraps from plotting against them, giving Persia leverage..

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

The provinces were created by Darius, who also selected a governor for each. With each province had its own set of customs, legislation, and socioeconomic class, and the governorship largely being passed down from father to son (Abrams). Newly captured areas were also divided into provinces known as satrapies, which were administered by vassal rulers known as satraps, and the empire only required conscripts for the military and tribute from each province (Abrams). Despite having to provide the emperor with a gold or silver tribute, each province had a governor, a military coordinator, and a financial controller all of whom probably reported directly to the king himself (Abrams). With the empire’s provinces being run by the king’s vassal’s the empire was kept in

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

All three empires were founded by ambitious leaders who sought to establish their authority and legitimize their rule by claiming descent from certain historical, political, or religious leaders. Despite sharing a

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Empires throughout history have all had their own methods to political control. Some very similar others could not be any more different. Some of the great empires such as the Han and the Roman had very similar approaches to political control. Although both the Han and the Roman empires had similar forms of government both bureaucracies, both empires had many individual characteristics as well.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were similar because of the use of the Silk Road as a trading route and both grew and developed because of mandatory military service but were different because the Roman Empire declined because of the expansion of its borders while the Han dynasty declined because of enemy military pressure and because of the wealth and power of its aristocracy. Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty used the Silk Road for trade. Chinese merchants returned from trading expeditions to report that Chinese silk was being purchased and traded all along a trading route named the Silk Road. This long route stretched from East Asia all the way to Italy in central Europe.

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

World leaders hold the power to shape the course of human history, and two of the most significant empires to ever exist were the Roman and Mongol empires. Augustus Caesar, the leader of the Roman Empire was born in 63 BCE; Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongol Empire, was born in 1162. Though born ages apart, they were both effective leaders who established expansive empires and while there is no arguing against their ability to lead such empires, a question remains; what qualities made them such excellent rulers, and which ruler created a more stable empire? Each empire held immense power for many years, but because of the difference in the long-term stability of their respective empires, Augustus must be the superior leader.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

The Mongols in China, and the Mongols in Persia were similar and different in multiple ways. The Mongols in China and Persia were similar in the way that the Mongols treated the non-Mongols, the role of the non-Mongols, and what led to the collapse of the Mongols. The difference between the two is how the Mongols took over the area, the restrictions on non-Mongols, and the results of non-Mongols in the area. The Mongols in China and the mongols in Persia both treated the non-Mongols the same. The both made them work.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

During the Ottoman and Mughal empires the states had strong bonds in many parts of the rule but depending on the empire there was also some big differences in how they handled things such as tolerance to other religions and military. As the empires grew they developed different way of dealing with and accepting other religions. Between the two their tactics for developing military were quite different in the fact of who they enrolled and how members were chosen. They both brought in the traditions of the Steppe from Turkish and Mongol peoples.

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

Actually defining the Iraq/Iran border still in place today, the world’s finest carpets, outstanding architecture, volatile religious differences, and battles for territory, what do these have in common? To answer this, let’s explore the Ottoman and Safavid Empires. Both empires had a key leader. For the Ottoman Empire 1301-1922 (AD), this was Suleiman the Magnificent. As sultan of the Ottoman Empire he overhauled the Ottoman legal system, led his armies into battle, brought peace to different religious sects, and contributed to the advancement of the arts.

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

This amount of religious and cultural freedom and incorporation was not used by empires of the past. Over two centuries ago the Assyrians would rearrange populations around their empire. The unfamiliarity of the land would leave people with little means to wage war against their overlords. The Babylonians existed less than a century before the reign of Darius, yet their subjugating polices were very different. Babylon would transfer the upper classes to Babylon, which would take leadership away from those who could cause trouble.

Read More
57 Words | 1 Pages

Throughout history, there has been many battles in which two large and powerful empires fought to maintain land, fought over religion, or to gain an abundance of resources. These empires, the Greek and the Persian, were hostile towards each other at the time. Although these empires were quite similar, they were near direct opposites at the time.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, their political control was more controlled by spiritual beliefs. The king even appointed Dhamma Mahamatras to look after the spiritual well being of the people. The two civilizations both differed in their views for keeping peace within the empire but still the ultimate goal for each was to keep

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Comparing and Contrasting the Roman Empire and Kingdom of God There were, and are, many kingdoms and empires in this world. Some of these kingdoms are quite similar, and some, are not even close to the same. The Roman Empire and the Kingdom of God, two very important kingdoms in our lifetime, both have several interesting similarities and differences.

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

The Assyrian empire and the Persian empire were two of the earliest major empires in the world. The Assyrians came in to power first, ruling from 900 BC to about 600 BC and with the help of Cyrus the Great, the Persians rose to power around 550BC. The Assyrian and Persian militaries shared many similarities, but they also differed in some aspects. Some of their similarities include their battle tactics, the organization of their armies, and their success in conquering societies. One of the major differences that stood out the most was that the Assyrians used a more brutal approach when conquering and the Persians used a more enlighten approach and were more tolerant.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Persian Empire Vs Roman Empire

Related Topics

Open Document