ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Professional And Virtue Ethics

1082 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast utilitarian deontological ethical theories

Critically evaluate two of the moral theories

Ethics have many kinds first we talk about professional and virtue ethics then we discussed Utilitarianism. Although the criteria of virtue ethics are bigger as we compare to professional ethics. Virtue ethics is emphasized upon the role of one's character and one's character expressed determination and evaluation of ethical behavior. Virtue ethics is one of the approaches that belong to normative ethics. Normative ethics is often opposite from deontology. The reason is that deontology emphasizes upon duties that derived from rules and consequences that derived from current situation. These things derived right or wrong side from the outcome of anyone’s act that he and she performed like Ralf …show more content…

One thinks that if he or she agreed with the offer of installing one’s software because it did not hurt anyone and not is bad or contradict with society’s norms (Darwall, 2002).
Utilitarianism is related to normative ethics. In it we consider that best moral actions are those that maximize the utility level. But we define utility in a large spectrum that is related to well-being of any person. Jeremy Bentham is the creator of Utilitarianism. According to him utility is the pleasure that we achieved after deducting our pains. It is focused upon rules instead of moral actions of any individual.
We use this type of ethics in our daily life frequently. When somebody asked us to explain about our feeling then we are bound to do some actions, we like good actions and avoid bad. The word utility is very due to the reasoning of actions. Sometime one’s pain gives pleasure of others. Utilitarianism is linked with straightforwardness in decision matters and keeps in mind the moral side of any action for any situation in which we find …show more content…

Second, we keep our mind all the benefits and damages that appeared as a result of our actions and check that are effect by our actions. Third step is that after analyzing the consequences, we choose the most suitable set of action that provides us maximum benefits after the costs that we have taken to attain it into account (West, 2004).
After the passage of time the area of utilitarianism is expanded and appeared as a most refined shape. So that today we have plenty of variations of this ethical theory. For example, Bentham just explains the concept of benefits and problems in term of pleasure and pain. Bentham John Stuart Mill, explain the concept of utilitarianism in the form benefits and harms not in just pleasure and pain he explain in term of the quality and intensity of any pleasure and pain. Today utilitarian’s describe benefits and harms in most scientific way. They explain it in term of satisfaction and personal preferences (Hayry,

Show More
Related
130 Words | 1 Pages

There are many unique and exciting fact about the Brothers Grimm! The two brothers (Jacob and Wilhelm) were born into a family of 9 kids, but unfortunately three of the nine died in infancy. Although they were a happy family they lived in poverty. Then, Jacob and Wilhelm went to college and they both studied law and medieval German literature at Marburg University. After they graduated, they started recreating stories from oral traditions.

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The context of the paper is discussion of why utilitarianism is consistently appealing. As Foot

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to act and rule utilitarianism and proving that utilitarianism is untenable. Both act and rule utilitarianism attempt to argue that what is right or wrong can be proven by what morally increases the well being of people. Act utilitarianism argues that

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

As a college student, I am always keeping myself updated with different new university policies because many policies are impacting my college life. Although many policies are impacting me in school, college tuition is the most important to me. The increase of college tuition at U.C and CSU will cause many problems for students. The school administration thinks that is the time to increase student tuition, but students will not benefit from the increase. Therefore, my paper will offer a utilitarian evaluation of the recent CSU and UC increase in tuition, it will show that said policy is unethical from a business and social standpoint.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

It states that an action which is deemed right is one that has not merely some good consequences, but also the greatest amount of good consequences possible when the negative consequences are also given due considerations. According to the utilitarian principle, the righteousness of an action is solely judged on the basis of its consequences. Classical utilitarianism determines the balance of pleasure and pain for each individual affected by the action in question as well as the amount of utility for the whole

Read More
1193 Words | 5 Pages

When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism Justification of Exam Cheating Utilitarianism is one of the best ethical approaches that can be used to justifying a right action from a wrong action by focusing on the outcome of the path taken. The most important thing is that the action taken to achieve a certain outcome has to be of the greater benefit of the society at large. Whether the outcome is bad, it can be used to morally justify some deeds regardless of how inhumane they can be. On the other side, utilitarianism also does not justify everything because it is difficult at time to predict whether the actions taken will be good or bad at the end. Additionally, values cannot be accounted for.

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

Commonly, ethical systems are categorized into two major systems. The deontological approaches or normative ethical position which judges an action based on the adherence of the action to certain rules and the teleological approaches which judges primarily based on the consequences of an action (Hare, 1964). The Utilitarianism is assigned to the teleological approaches, as it does not evaluate an action by itself but by it’s

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

As it has been shown, the utilitarian view has its strengths and is certainly logical in some cases, however, Kantian ethics offer a more stable set of moral

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy that is credited to being created by Jeremey Bentham. Bentham believed that all humans make choices based on two feelings, pain and pleasure. Because of this, Bentham believed that motives are not good or bad in nature but instead on what feeling a human might feel more.

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

Read More
1201 Words | 5 Pages

Generally, ethics is defined as the rule for carrying out certain behaviors by distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable behavior (Resnik, 2015). In other words, ethics assists in determining whether a decision is right or wrong when given a choice. As a matter of course, decision-making is first predisposed by personal ethic that is constructed on personal experience and conscience (Fritzsche & Oz, 2007) . It tends to be affected by family and friends (Ferrell & Gresham, 1985). Not only does personal ethics guide human behavior but also social ethics (Shaw, 2002).

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Professional And Virtue Ethics

Related Topics

Open Document