ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Roman And Han Empires

564 Words3 Pages

Empires throughout history have all had their own methods to political control. Some very similar others could not be any more different. Some of the great empires such as the Han and the Roman had very similar approaches to political control. Although both the Han and the Roman empires had similar forms of government both bureaucracies, both empires had many individual characteristics as well.

Between 31 BCE to 476 CE empires usually had a similar approach to government. An emperor who was supreme and divine and some type of advisors. Roman and Han empires shared this characteristic. Unlike the Han, Rome had its own senate, Roman emperors typically had many advisors. The roman empire used a senate method which allowed for their citizens to contribute and vote. This showed the citizen that they had some control and created a strong government following in the people and helped eliminate the chance of uprisings. The han however had no citizen participation in their government their emperor held all the power in government. A main way to maintain control in this system was using harsh and excessive punishment. …show more content…

Both empires were highly focused on territorial expansion but with the expanding territories more emphasis was need to be placed on a well rounded military in order to maintain full control. The Roman empire;s military was very focused on the skill and quantity of the armies. The size of the arm scared the citizen into maintaining obedience to the emperor. Unlike the Roman the Han required men to serve in their military. Because of China’s isolation the risk for invasion from enemies or barbarians. Just like the Roman empire the army was a sign of strength for the citizens and forced the citizens to continue to follow the

Show More
Related
538 Words | 3 Pages

The ideals and methods of Tang China and Charlemagne’s government, both are powerful political figures of their time. Each government has their own similarities and differences that make them unique and suited to the areas they ruled. Starting with Tang China, the ideal ruler was known as the "Son of Heaven" and was believed to rule by the Mandate of Heaven. The ideal ruler was expected to be wise and follow the Confucian principles, and ruling with the welfare of the people in mind. In Tang China, the ruler was expected to be benevolent and just, taking care of the welfare of the people(Lecture).

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Unit 7 is a rather long section covering both Rome and China 's powerful and expansive empires during the time period 300 BCE - 300 CE. The Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome were very similar in their unprecedented scale and duration. Although they did operate in differing ways, for example, Rome relied on slaves to expand its workforce, while the Chinese 's economy lived off of free peasant farmers. The Chinese benefited from having an overwhelming population that would benefit the bureaucracy and supply political stability for the Hans. When it came to the Roman Empire, religion did not have the same impact that Confucianism had on the dynasties in China.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The Han and Roman Empire’s economies were both dependent on agriculture. The Han used peasants to plant rice; basically, China’s lower class planted a staple crop to support the economy. Unlike the Han

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

During this period of time the Ming and the Han were able to improve their way of having a government. The Ming were able to solve this problem by not having the government add harsh and strict rules, this also improved by showing compassion towards their citizens, they also split their government into functional sections in order to help them prosper. And due to having other new governments they were able to use some of their ideas like making the ships and boats move a lot faster than usual. But for the Han government was able to prosper by establishing a new political system, they also followed the ideas of Confucianism by believing that their ruler was a father over them and they should not be lead by force. The government officials were told to be honest.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

It says in TCI that the Han made improvements on the Chinese governments and they softened the harsh rules and brought back Confucianism into that government. It says in the text “The government of China during this time functioned as a bureaucracy. A bureaucracy is a large organization that operates using a fixed set of rules and conditions.” this shows that the government changed because of the Hans and for that better, with a bureaucracy it was strong and effective. During this time it says in the text that “They had many responsibilities, including overseeing the maintenance of roads and canals.”

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty allowed ecological creation to impact, their society economically. But, with human resources it allowed both empires to consolidate their power with limits; rather than expanding their empires. The Roman and Han Dynasty showed their power of quality in building a empire. In three hundred and fifty BCE, Rome was one of several city states on the Italian peninsula with no imperial ancestors.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Political integration between both empires had both similarities and differences, most notably being different with the ways they chose those to rule. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy relied on local elites (landholders) and the middle-class citizens to control provinces. Imperial Rome was far less complex, compared to the bureaucracy of Han China. Many official positions within the government were bought or became hereditary through family wealth as opposed to earned by merit, due to this fact, the Roman bureaucracy often suffered from poor governance. One of the reasons the empire was so unified even

Read More
2586 Words | 11 Pages

Since there were so many people in the empire, the local governments could make sure everybody was happy and enforce stability and laws. It was also their duty to keep the economy running and in good

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

Thirdly, They adopted the centralized government, but they softened the harsh ruling style. They had many government officials to help run the vast empire. During this time, the government “functioned as a large, complex organization that functions under a given set of rules and conditions”. People that were above them in each level of bureaucracy directed people a level below them. The highest level of Han officials got to live in the capital to give the emperor advice.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Comparing and Contrasting the Roman Empire and Kingdom of God There were, and are, many kingdoms and empires in this world. Some of these kingdoms are quite similar, and some, are not even close to the same. The Roman Empire and the Kingdom of God, two very important kingdoms in our lifetime, both have several interesting similarities and differences.

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

As well as the two separate beliefs, I believe that the goal of what to achieve was different, causing the Han Dynasty to stand out more. The Qin Dynasty’s achievements were to build a stronger and more efficient army. To do so, they improved the transportation and built the Great Wall. Shi Huangdi made many inventions to help people, including the Silk Road which was used to trade with others in order to receive acceptance, money, information, and trust.

Read More
1645 Words | 7 Pages

This time would be difficult for citizens as Rome began to fall.  Expansion became the enemy of Rome because they couldn’t keep all of the cities in

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, he took measures to control this expanding empire. Lands were split into districts with respective cities. An appointed governor was responsible for controlling the soldiers of that city, and collecting taxes. This system of delegation and control was a model for other newer

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Roman And Han Empires

Related Topics

Open Document