ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Abu Ghraib

1574 Words7 Pages

Introduction
What happens when good people are put in an evil place? Does humanity overpower evil, or does evil triumph over it? When good people are put in an evil place, the triumphing of evil can be explained through a mix of mob mentality and labeling theory. First, I will discuss the events of the Stanford Prison Experiment, and how it turned good people into bad. Second, I will present the events of Abu Ghraib, and how evil triumphed there as well. Third, I will compare both the Stanford Prison Experiment and the events of Abu Gharib to the Capitol Storming that occurred in January 2021. When good people are put in an evil place, the ideas of labeling theory and mob mentality help to explain why evil triumphs over humanity.
Stanford …show more content…

This experiment consisted of a roaster of students who were enrolled to either act as guards or inmates in an imaginary prison setting. This was to test the behavior of humans when put in a non-restrictive authority position over someone with lesser power through labeling. This experiment was set to last for two weeks, but by the sixth day, the guards had become so abusive to the ‘inmates’ that Zimbardo was forced to end the experiment early. Some of the fake inmates had to leave the experiment even earlier due to the abuse they received. After the experiment, almost all the students who participated as guards felt guilty about their actions. (Genzlinger, 2015) This experiment displayed that when good people are put into a place that holds potential for evil actions, they can be mentally pressured by this freedom and by the actions of their peers to participate in evil …show more content…

Capitol can be compared to the Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib in the way that it displays mob mentality and the significance of labeling theory. In all instances, there was a group who strongly identified with a label they were given - “guard”, soldier, and Trump supporter. These labels played slightly different roles on each occasion, but overall, the fact that there was a superior label felt in the group’s identity was the key factor. Furthermore, mob mentality also played a role in all the instances. While the storming of the U.S. Capitol was a different type of mob mentality than the Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib, the idea of mob mentality still applies to all the above. For the U.S. Capitol, the mob mentality was on a much larger scale than the other two. But for the Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib, the identity of those involved were submitted to the occurrence of mob

Show More
Related

Kyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'

749 Words | 3 Pages

In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

Read More

Similarities Between Stanford Prison Experiment And Abu Ghraib

1384 Words | 6 Pages

Another factor was the unprofessionalism. Stanford prison experiment consisted of college student that wasn’t really aware of what they were getting themselves. At Abu Ghraib, the officials were unknowledgeable of their duties. They didn’t receive information on how to proceed once behind the walls. The military personnel’s didn’t have sufficient training, which led to the unprofessionalism.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo

751 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

Read More

Comparing Handmaid's Tale, The Lucifer Effect, And Harrison Bergeron

1260 Words | 6 Pages

Offred in the Handmaid's Tale also illustrates this phenomenon. As she is forced to conform to the oppressive society of Gilead, she feels like she is turning evil. Her inability to act on her own and resist the societal pressures to conform leads to her becoming complicit in the subjugation of other women. The Stanford Prison Experiment also provides insight into how conformity can lead to evil. In this experiment, college students were randomly assigned roles as prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment.

Read More

Review Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience

1297 Words | 6 Pages

Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in 1963 regarding the obedience to authority in “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrates that when placed under peculiar circumstances, ordinary citizens are capable of performing terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings by concluding that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the well-being of the learner (Milgram 86). Herbert C. Kelman, a Harvard University Social Ethics professor, and V. Lee Hamilton, a former University of Maryland Sociology chair, share of a U.S. military massacre in “The My Lai Massacre: A Military

Read More

Holmesburg Prison Essay

628 Words | 3 Pages

From 1896 up until 1995 the Holmesburg Prison in Pennsylvania was in constant use. Much of the history at Holmesburg’s contains instances of rioting, murder, rape and even medical experimentation. Most prisons claim some violence in their past but Holmesburg’s borders on barbaric. Maybe this strong negative energy is what keeps the ghosts of Holmesburg Prison so active.

Read More

Salem Witch Trials During Ww2

936 Words | 4 Pages

Far too often in history, a person’s negative or evil views have influenced others to commit terrible atrocities. In the 1930s, Adolph Hitler hated the Jews and blamed them for the declining economy, high unemployment rate, and other ills in the world. Because he was a master orator, he easily convinced the German citizens to agree with his views, including the belief that Jewish people should be punished, causing their mass execution during World War II. In recent years, leaders of various terrorist cells have used similar tactics of vengeance, brotherhood, and patriotism, recruiting impressionable young adults, promising eternal salvation as a reward for torture, murder, and even suicide. Closer to home, in massachusetts during

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More

Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

876 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 and was funded by the US Naval Office. The experiment consisted of 24 volunteer college students who were paid $15 a day to serve as guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment. Prior to the experiment, each volunteer was given a diagnostic interview to eliminate anyone with “psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse.” The experiment “was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labeling, and social expectations on behavior over a period of two weeks,” but Zimbardo ended it after six days due to abuse by the guards and the psychological wellbeing of the prisoners. By the second day of the experiment, Zimbardo already noticed behavioral changes in both the guards and prisoners.

Read More

Zimbardo The Lucifer Effect Analysis

612 Words | 3 Pages

The author states that good people can become bad people. There is a line between people’s mind, and this line can be gone through. She shows that when people are dehumanizing, their responsibilities can be diffused. In this way, good people can turn bad people.

Read More

Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment

599 Words | 3 Pages

Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.

Read More

Why Is The Stanford Prison Experiment Bad

770 Words | 4 Pages

Stanford Prison Argumentative Essay Have you ever felt like you have another side to you that is evil? There was an experiment done by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. The experiment's main goal was to find out if humans are really evil by nature, and the results show that everyone can be evil, but something has to cause a reaction in your brain where you have to use this "hidden evil" to survive. The Stanford prison experiment was a very beneficial and cruel experiment, but it was a necessary one at that; it opened our eyes to human nature and to how we adapt in our environment to survive. This experiment had a crucial influence on many people's beliefs that humans are evil by nature.

Read More

How Does Golding Present Human Nature In Lord Of The Flies

1238 Words | 5 Pages

During the Stanford Prison experiment, college student volunteers were put in a position that brought out their worst. Similar to the corruption of power in Animal Farm, the authority that the volunteer guards immediately received changed how they began to act. With the additional anonymity, these average people turned into heartless rulers. They began to punish the prisoners excessively; the guards “escalated very noticeably their level of harassment, increasing the humiliation they made the prisoners suffer, forcing them to do menial, repetitive work such as cleaning out toilet bowls with their bare hands” (Stanford Prison Experiment). When given the opportunity, people revert to savagery and evil; when all forms of identity and respect are gone, nothing is stopping the guards from abusing their role.

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review

1129 Words | 5 Pages

Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

Read More

The Environment In Lord Of The Flies By William Golding

907 Words | 4 Pages

A Stanford experiment wanted to simulate a prison to test what would happen when somebody is in a position of power, and when somebody is vulnerable to this environment. The experiment went well at first, but by the end of the experiment “The prisoners began to suffer a wide array of humiliations by the hands of the guards, and many began to show signs of mental and emotional stress” (Shuttleworth). Just like the boys on the island, the inmates in this experiment were in an unfamiliar environment and essentially powerless to the external factors around them. The inmates in this situation showed signs of emotional distress and they knew that the experiment was going to end. The boys on the island however, did not.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Abu Ghraib

Related Topics

Open Document