After the Revolutionary War, Americans desperately needed a new form of government. While most states had already established a constitution, there was no framework for a national government. Eventually, states agreed to join in a loose union. This resulted in the creation of the Articles of Confederation, which was adopted on November 15, 1777. Due to the colonists’ negative experiences with a monarchy during the revolution, they intentionally wrote the Articles of Confederation so that states could maintain their sovereignty. In other words, although a central government existed in the form of Congress, the states would retain most of their power. The colonists felt that this would prevent a monarchy or tyranny from forming again. However, …show more content…
The Articles required nine out of the thirteen states’ approval in creating new laws and agreement from all states to make changes in the Articles. Taking into account the differences between them, gaining approval from all thirteen states was a challenge. For one, states had drastically different needs depending on their location. Northern states were more industrial and relied on commerce and businesses such as fishing. Hence, they favored giving Congress more power to control trade. However, southern states, who were more agricultural, disagreed, fearing that Congress would tax their exports and reduce profits. Their differing views would make it difficult to come to a consensus. Besides that, each state had two to seven representatives based on size and only one vote in Congress. Larger states with more representatives had difficulty agreeing on how to cast their vote and argued that they should have more votes because of their larger population. In contrast, smaller states believed the opposite; if representation was based on size, then smaller states would not have an equal voice in Congress. Hence, they favored giving each state one vote, regardless of size. Without a doubt, the Articles of Confederation led to more divisions between states, and consequently, the government was inefficient in making