Compare And Contrast The Edicts Of King Ashoka And Spartan Government

1597 Words7 Pages

Political Systems
A government has been the cause of the success and failure of each society, state, empire, and country. There has to be a government to maintain control within the territory it governs over, but there have been government more successful that others due to the system of checks and balances present within the government. “The Edicts of King Ashoka” was a type of government that had no system of checks and balances. The Spartan government had a corrupt system of checks and balances that made the system irrelevant. The political system that best works is presented by the Magna Carta because the systems of checks and balances contains a structure that make the system sustainable, rules and laws reinforce the system, and the rights …show more content…

The Spartan government consisted of a king, council of elders, and the Ephors. The Ephors were citizens of the state who represented and were elected by a majority of the population. Every citizen was eligible to be elected as an Ephor. Compared to the United States government, the Ephors are likened to the legislative branch of government because they “determine suits about contracts” (Aristotle). Noble people made up the council of the elders who were essentially the judicial branch of the government because they were the “judges of homicide” (Aristotle). The king was the executive branch of government and was usually a general who had success in war. The poor citizens, the majority, had representation in the government which helped keep them content and prevented rebellion and civil war from occurring. The system Sparta had in place allowed the government to have a system of checks and balances which prevented any one person from having all the power. While the Spartan government did have a system of checks and balances, the structure led to