Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The articles of confederation
The articles of confederation
The articles of confederation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The articles of confederation
The articles of confederation
The articles of confederation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Democratic-Republicans followed a strict interpretation of the constitution, where Federalists believed that the document was up for interpretation, and followed a loose construction. The Federalists believed that there should be a strong central government and that elected officials should not be directly influenced by the people. Essentially, they believed that the people would make poor decisions, if left to their own devices. They represented the elite and well off of society. The Democratic-Republicans thought that there should be a small central government, meaning that the power stayed with the states.
A big difference which caused a lot of problems was that the Federalist were for the first bank of the United States supported by Alexander Hamilton while the Republicans were very much against it. Another thing
The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans disagreed on various aspects of politics. Federalists believed in a looser interpretation of the constitution. This meant that they did not follow the constitution for what it strictly said, but rather they interpreted the constitution with the belief that there were implications within the constitution. For example, Hamilton believed that the construction of the bank was constitutional, for it was implied within the constitution (Document
On the other hand, Federalists believed that we would
The Federalists thought that the states should have little power, with the extra power given to the central government. The Democratic-Republicans supported having states that have nearly equal power to the main government. Nowadays, the Democratic-Republicans won out on this topic. Probably the biggest difference between them is how much power the constitution has over the government.
The first political parties began in the mid 1790's, with the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans. The two parties had their differences and similarities. Here are some differences, the Federalist wanted a strong central government which meant the states had no power, a little like having a king. In the other hand the Democratic-Republicans wanted to limit the government because they feared that if the government had too much power it would endanger people's liberties. The federalist wanted an alliance with the British because of the distrust with the French after the French revolution as stated in page 291.
The differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans is that they both have different leaders. For Example, the Federalists leader was Alexander Hamilton and they were favored for multiple reasons such as, strong federal government, loosing interpretation of the constitution, they supported the representative government, and the federalists were ruled by the wealthy class. The Democratic-Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson and they were ruled by the people. They were also favored by multiple reasons for example, they had a strong state government, strict interpretation of the constitution, just to name a few. As you can see they both are absolutely different from each other especially in the war against the French.
Arising from the smoke of the French Revolution was a wave of Jacobin ideologies arriving on the shores of the American continent. During this diffusion of ideas, there were two primary political parties trying to gain power in America: the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists. With the Democratic-Republicans adopting French Jacobin ideologies and Federalists leaning towards anti-Jacobin views, tension between the two parties erupted into a bitter political conflict resulting in each side doing what they had to in order to gain power. Subsequently, Federalist politicians used anti-French Revolution propaganda in order to shape American political views and ultimately gain power in government. Adopting the name “Jacobins”(416)1, Democratic-Republicans
To compare and contrast the differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-republicans? Is by the federalists and the democratic-republicans both have people that put rules down too Rule by the wealthy class and Rule by the people but they are a different type of people like the wealthy class and the normal people. Another compare things they both have is that they both have strong governments but Alexander and Thomas had different governments like Alexander had a strong federal government and Thomas had a strong state government. Also, Alexander and Thomas had an alliance but with different people like Alexander had an alliance with British and Thomas had an alliance with the French. But an overall, they both had banks but, they both
The battle between the Republican’s and the Federalist back in the 1700’s still carry out today between the Republican and the Democratic Party. Corruption is the most worried about topic that drives concern for the for all everyone involved politically and as a citizen. The politician is always mindful that their reputations are at stake and they should keep themselves as gentlemanly as possible. William McClay was a Senator of Pennsylvania whose anxiety was overwhelming. He was feared about everything from dinner parties, corruption, his position in the Senate and President Washington among many other things.
The Federalists supported a strong national government and diplomatic harmony with the British, while the Republicans believed that a decentralized government was the best for America.
There are a lot of things that Federalists and Democratic Republicans have in common so out of all of them these are some that I found on page 292, according to page 292 on the bottom it states that the Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalist. The Federalists where ruled by the wealthy class. They had a strong federal government, they were allies with Britain, they protected tariffs. On the other hand there is the Democratic Republicans. The Democratic Republicans were ruled by the people not just high class or low class like the Federalist but anyone.
The only way the anti-federalists would be able to protect the rights of the citizens was creating the Bill of Rights. And which they explained that, “... The natural rights of the people must receive specific and extraordinary protection if they are not to be violated” (VII.2). This would protect the rights of the American people guaranteeing them protection under the law and lessen the power of the government.
Federalist wanted wealthy and educated people and the Democrats wanted ordinary people. Federalist wanted strong national government and the Democrats wanted state banks. Federalist were Pro-British and the Democrats were Pro-French. Federalist loose interpretation constitution and the Democrats were strict interpretation constitution. Federalist were very selfish they only cared about the rich and the Democrats were good people they cared about the rich and poor people.
Today’s America has evolved differently from the intention of a certain group of the founder’s. This essay takes the stance that America in 2017 is moving closer to the viewpoint of the Federalists, compared to the Republicans. First, one must analyze the two parties, then draw the conclusion with supportive facts. Lastly, the comparisons will be summarized and the differences will be minimized.