ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Governments Of Rome And Carthage

599 Words3 Pages

Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed.
The government structure of Carthage was not based on monarchy and not influenced by the city of Tyre in Phoenicia, but it had a system to elect officials responsible in the assembly. The elite aristocratic was the powerful fingers who held the political, military and judicial power, in the same way, the aristocracy controlled the Roman Republic. (Cartwright, 2016). In the Roman society, the patricians held the wealth and the highest government position. The Roman government structure consisted of two consuls, who govern the republic, a Senate only elected from the wealthy patricians, and the lower class plebeians had no power to participate in the politics and only allowed to vote. The two parties the patricians and the plebeians were not allowed to marry each other, however, through time the plebeians gained some power to elect their own representative at the Senate. (US History, n.d). …show more content…

The Carthage elect two suffetes starting from 5th century BCE, one leads the military during the war and the other one stayed home to govern the city, also the suffetes closely working with the Senate. The Carthage from 200 to300 influential citizens held senate power to consult the suffetes regarding political policy, diplomatic issue, trade and military, and they held the office for life. The other political part of the Carthage was the Aristotle (pentarchies) who were selected to work at the court as a judge, control religious places and oversee the taxation. In addition, the Carthage has an assembly who had the power to vote on decisions made by the suffetes and senates during their meeting in the marketplace, but in the Cartage the only male had citizen but the women and slaves not allowed to obtain the citizenship. (Cartwright,

Show More
Related
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic's system allowed every adult male citizen including free slaves to have a vote without any formal exclusion of the poor. Voting took place within subgroups known as Tribal or Century Assemblies where the majority vote won. The power of the citizen as a voter was divided into three categories: acting as criminal courts and participating in elections conducted by the Century or Tribal Assemblies and legislating. Only a limited group of elected annual magistrates could propose laws before the people in the assemblies. The Tribal Assembly served as the primary assembly for the passage of laws.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

The kingship (or monarchy) would be represented by the consuls, the aristocracy by Senate, and democracy be represented by the assemblies. By complementing one another, this would ensure that the government would work efficiently without having any party rising to sole power. The effectiveness of this government was so overwhelming, even Polybius admitted that this led to “nearly the whole world fell under the power of Rome in somewhat less than 53 years – an event certainly without precedent” (Polybius, VI.

Read More
315 Words | 2 Pages

"Is the United States today very similar to the Roman Empire or only a little bit like it?" The United States today is only a little bit alike the Roman Empire. I say this due to evidence found in a total of 5 different documents. Read on to hear the first piece. First off we had two completely different type of leaders.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

3. Compare and contrast the idea of democracy in Ancient Greece and Rome. Which system was more democratic and why? Democracy is the modern day standard for governmental systems. However up until 500 BCE, the concept of Democracy was a foreign concept, and the great civilizations of that era were run by monarchs, aristocrats, and religious leaders of sorts.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Introduction Rome and Carthage were almost equal in strength and resources. From the early days of the Republic, Rome and Carthage maintained a friendly relationship and even signed a treaty against Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, who was a threat to both states. Comparison Ancient Carthage was a wealthy state with a small population, it employed foreigners to do the unwanted jobs and relied on foreign mercenaries rather than citizens to do her fighting. The mercenaries did not have a sense of belonging to the Carthaginian nation.

Read More
86 Words | 1 Pages

• Alexander the Great was the best orator and a great commanding officer. He won multiple wars whether they were in Asia or at the sea while suppressing revolts from his conquered lands. On the other hand, Constantine the Great was the first Emperor to establish Christianity during his reign in Rome that shifted Western history. Both leaders were termed “Great” because of their own achievement. They had different set of ways in winning wars, improving Ancient Greek and Ancient Rome, and proving peace and prosperity.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Patricians vs. The Plebeian: Economy and Politics The Patricians and Plebeians were the two major classes that formed the Roman Population. As both names suggest, the patricians were noble aristocratic men, while the patrician were just commoners. As in most ancient civilizations, the Romans lived in a state of aristocracy, wherein a few control all the wealth and power, while the common people was left to fend for themselves. These differences in economic status led to a series of conflicts, in which plebeians, composed of the majority of the population, demand equal rights.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Iliad and The Odyssey are epic works. The main characters, Gilgamesh, Achilles and Odysseus, from the three legends portray excessive pride as seen in the poems. Their extreme pride trait makes them arrogant, as a result, they can hardly handle any situation correctly with honor, as required. In all the three epics, pride is depicted as a destructive force that not only destroys the individual but the whole society.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

As time went on, there became few legal differences between the plebeians and the patricians. The plebeians could be elected to the senate and even be consuls. Plebeians and patricians could also get married. Wealthy plebeians became part of the Roman nobility. However, despite changes in the laws, the patricians always held a majority of the wealth and power in Ancient Rome.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Rome and Carthage, the two-superpower at the time, had numbers of similarities, differences, advantages and weakness. In this paper, I will explain the strength of the two-mighty empire which existed in ancient times. In addition to that, what lead Rome to become a naval power and how did they achieve that. Body In the early years of the Roman Republic, a civilization in northern Africa almost as powerful as Rome was expanding her influence in several continents.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

After the kings were driven out of Rome, a new form of government came about, but it was an aristocracy rather than a democracy. In this aristocracy it was the patricians who were in charge since they usually had more money than the plebeians. Furthermore, the plebeians were not able to hold any of the new offices formed in the new government after the kings. Plebeians were also not allowed to be a part of the senate. These initial differences among plebeians and the patricians made the struggle difficult among these two groups because plebeians wanted a more equal distribution of wealth (Morey, 1901).

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

There are many similarities that can be noticed between the American Nation and the Roman Empire such as the same founding of government and both dominated in military, and economic similarities. Rome is famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and their mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. Rome warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the roman pursuit of victory was determined. Rome gave many good ideas; the senate was ruled by the people of Rome. The Roman Republic Government was a large complex constitution, which was secure by many checks and balances, so that no man could have complete control.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

Carthage was a colony of Tyre, before becoming a commercial giant, it was the capital city on the coast of North Africa.(Morey, W,C, 1901). The government of Carthage was similar to that of Rome in structure, they had two suffettes which were the equivalent of Roman consuls, it also had a council of elders called the ‘Hundred’ which were the equivalent of the senate of Rome. The government was although similar in some respects was also greatly different, as we have seen before in Greece, Carthage was ruled by a few wealthy families (Morey, W,C, 1901). The main problem Carthage had was that it failed to understand the Roman philosophy of incorporating its citizens from conquered cities, therefore Rome had more loyalty from their citizens than Carthage could hope for.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

But there were significant democratic elements in some cases, as well as examples of autocracy. Later Rome added emphasis on law and the institutions of a great, though somewhat decentralized empire. Politics were very important in classical Mediterranean civilization, from the Greek' city-states through the early part of the Roman Empire. Indeed, our word politics comes from the Greek word for city-state, polis, which correctly suggests that intense political interests were part of life in a city-state in both Greece and Rome.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

The government plays a major role in any civilization. The Greeks had several different types of government: Monarchy, Aristocracy, Oligarchy, and Democracy. The Democratic Government is the type of government, which mainly influenced our modern civilization. Democratic Government simply means the citizens have the power, which is the type of government here in the United States of America.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Governments Of Rome And Carthage

Related Topics

Open Document