More handpicked essays just for you.
The social and economic outfall from the civil war
Essay on how civil war changed the economy
Essay on how civil war changed the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The South had a greater advantage in terms of morale. They rightly saw segments of the North refusing to fight a war for slaves, no matter what Lincoln might say. It would affect the bottom lines of too many people, from wheat farmers in Iowa to factory owners in Massachusetts, who sent their products South for sale or brought cotton North for processing. The South had a stronger tradition of military leadership and a certain expectation of assistance from Britain, militarily and economically. Lastly, they thought that the North would attack first, giving them the advantage of fighting mostly on home territory in a defensive war.
Gauge Zidlick Mollie Swayne English 102 12 February 2018 How Technology Advancements Effected the Civil War The Civil War brought about many different advancements in a variety of areas during the time period. Everything from battlefield communication to weapon technology received an upgrade, allowing both the North and the South to become more effective fighters on the battlefield. New weapon technology allowed soldiers to engage each other in ways never thought of in previous wars.
Many military strategies of the Civil War Many military strategies of the Civil War which made it the deadliest of all American wars. During the Civil War many strategies were used by the South and North, to fight hard but the hardest will win. There are many battles, many weapons were used, along with spies and navies. There were many battles, navies were important, spies were used in the war, very much, along with many weapons, and the South won the war. There were many major battles of the Civil War, the first one was Fort Sumter, others were the First Battle of Bull Run, Shiloh, Seven days battle, Fredericksburg, Vicksburg, and Gettysburg ("Civil War Battles”).
The Civil War on the other hand, was a period in American history that was marked by great inflation, on both sides of the conflict. Both the Union and Confederacy were faced with the urgent need to generate large quantities of funds to pay for the exorbitant costs involved in prosecuting the ongoing war. Both governments then resorted to the same tactic in order to acquire the funds they so desperately needed to continue to fund their respective militaries. They simply printed more money as they needed in order to pay their outstanding debts. The difference, however, was that the Union’s currency was backed by a gold and silver standard.
The American Civil War began in 1861 and it came to an end on 13th May 1865, with a victory for the North. However, in the past the South had won earlier battles of the war, at first they appeared to have strong military leadership. There were many reasons why the South did not win the war, other than their poor strategy within the military generals. Economic, social, political and military were one of the major factors. The North was better economically than the South, and this enabled the North to buy more guns, supplies, and equipment for the war.
The Union was victorious in the American Civil War, this had altered the course of history for Americans in the residing in the North and South. The Reconstruction era had lasting effects throughout the two regions as it attempted to discuss the inequities of slavery in the South but also reunited the seceded states. Within the historical timeline, between 1865 through 1898, the differences in political, social, and economic legacies of the North and South is apparent. However, similarities are observed in the migration of oppressed groups during the development of the West. This was possible because of railroad expansion in the North and after the war, the railroad was rapidly expanding in the South and westbound.
The North had an excellent Navy that had the ability to blockade things that were headed to the Southern states. The South desperately needed food, weapons, and ammunition but weren’t able to get their supplies because the North had blockades that stopped the supplies they needed. The North also had gun factories, shipyards, and coal readily available at anytime which puts them at a huge advantage over the South. They had more money and were just more advanced in their industry, which helped them win the civil war.
Though there were many of aspects of the North’s victory, such as help from the telegraph and railroad systems, certain excellent military strategies by the Union, there was also the factor of allowing former slaves into the army. Innovation - as outlined by Geoffrey Parker - is only one of the Western Ways of War, but it is easily the one that best exemplified warfare during the Civil War. This partially comes from “A willingness to accept ideas from all quarters.” This is shown through several ways, such as: the way black people flocked to the Union in order to fight against slavery, and the way fight against their former slaves strategically crippled the South. This is also shown through the North quickly accepting newer technologies, and unique strategies.
The North's primary military advantage was their substantial and solid navy, and an extensive amount of private exchanging ships. That implied that there was more Northern fighting power, factories, food, and railroads. The South did not have those same advantages like the North. The South's most exceedingly terrible military disadvantage was that they had no navy and a little populace to volunteer for armed force and make supplies. This implied the South was left with less supplies and little assets.
During the Civil War, both Northerners and Southerners debated what the status of African Americans would be after the war. With the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and the passing of the 13th amendment in 1865, it became unclear as to where African Americans stood both in government and in society. While neither Northerners nor Southerners perceived enslaved African Americans and whites as equals, Northerners did recognize that African Americans were citizens not property. Northerners did recognize African Americans as citizens, whereas Southerners did not.
The rising numbers of death in the South tremendously weakened their army, which allowed for a Northern succession. William C. Davis asserts, “Industrially the South couldn’t keep up in output and in manpower. By the end of the war, the South had, more or less, plenty of weaponry still, but it just didn’t have enough men to use the guns”. Having such a small army, the South was not able to sustain a decent amount of soldiers for the war. Henceforth, the Northern advantage of having more soldiers had a large impact on the Southern loss in the Civil
The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.
The winner has always written the history books. So, it came as no surprise that after the North’s victory in the American Civil War, the South was seen as the villain during the Reconstruction Era, all while the North was innocent and spot-free. The truth, however, said differently. The North was not nearly as innocent in Reconstruction, to the point where the Northern states, as a whole, could have killed reconstruction altogether. Reconstruction, in simple terms, was the effort to bring the Southern states back into the nation and mend the Union as one after the Southern states seceded and caused the Civil War.
“Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.” - Abraham Lincoln. The two bloodiest wars on American soil were the Civil War and the Revolutionary War. Both affected America greatly. One formed America, the other reunited it.
In February 1861, a new government was on the horizon in the United States, known as the Confederate States of America. Composed of seven states from the South, this new government looked to separate from a union that they felt was tipping in power towards those who wanted to threaten the rights of the South, especially slavery. Similarly, in early 1775, colonists were preparing for revolution against a power that they felt oppressed their rights and wanted to take away their liberties. However, the Civil War was a not a complete representation of a second American Revolution. The Civil War was more than an unsatisfied party rebelling against a larger power, but a clash between two vastly different ways of life.
