However the two groups did have one thing in common, neither group had great knowledge of the plague. The differences in the two groups was great. They each had their own unique ways of trying to prevent the plague, and what they believed caused the plague. The Christians strongly believed that the Jews were to blame for the spread of the plague, whereas the Muslims believed the Jews played no role in the cause of the plague.
Islam was the dominant faith of the middle-eastern societies, the population reacted to the plague by drawing closer to their religion. The muslims believed that the plague was a blessing from god and that they should ' 'accept the divine act ' ' Therefore , ' 'prayer lifting the epidemic is abhorrent ' ' (Doc 4). The plague that attacked muslims was more mortal than the European plague. This plague killed people faster.
The Justinian plague was a widespread disease named after Justinian, the emperor of the Byzantine Empire. During his reign from 527-565 AD, the plague broke out and it is understood that Justinian himself contracted the plague (Byrne). This plague spread all over the Mediterranean and wiped out between a quarter and a half of the population. The deaths of 30-50 million citizens assisted in the fall of the already faltering Roman Empire. Rome was in constant conflict with the Germanic people and when the plague hit, their military lost a lot of soldiers.
Specific groups were singled out for persecution and the Jews quickly became the primary scapegoat for the 14th century plague. This religious group was accused of conspiring to spread the plague by poisoning the waters and infecting the air, since Jews were often merchants and the infected rats were carried by
They both were caused by rats with infected blood. Also, there was no treatment for both. The Black Plague goes into your blood and the Justinian Plague gave you tomers and comas, which can cause death. Last, the Justinian Plague you can survive, but the Black Plague, once you get it you can't survive.
There are three common forms of the plague: The Bubonic,spread by direct flea bites, the Septimic, in which the bacteria directly enter the bloodstream, and the Pneumonic, in which the virus is inhaled into the lungs. The three branches of the disease gave it the versatility to spread faster and become even more
The reactions from the Christians and the Muslims to the greatly feared disease, known as the Black Death or the Great Plague were different in several ways. The first Plague was documented from 541 to 544 CE. Known as the Plague of Justinian. The Plague came in three different ways: bubonic, pneumonic, and septicemic. With bubonic being the most common.
They both had many deaths. They also believe the plagues were punishments from the God for their sins. In the Black Plague, people were obessed with death. In the Justinian Plague, he put down the city in lockdown.
The plague raged throughout Europe from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century evoking various responses from the people who experienced its terror. It affected all regions of Europe, killing one-third of the population. Various responses to the plague expressed different beliefs and concerns including exploitation, fear, and religious superstition. During the course of the plague these beliefs and concerns underwent change. During the outbreak of the plague fear dominated Europe, and as time passed fear became more irrational and superstitious.
One of the biggest summer nuisance would be the mosquito, but more specifically the Ades aegypti mosquito. The Aedes aegypti is the vector for yellow fever and the cause of the numerous deaths. In her book The American Plague: The Untold Story of Yellow Fever, The Epidemic the Shaped Our History, Molly Caldwell Crosby presents the idea that the mosquito is not just the only reason an epidemic occurred in the 18th century. This story accounts for the disease that broke out across the world and nearly destroyed almost all of North America’s population, which some believe could have been avoided by simple quarantine analysis and sanitary methods.
During the mid-fourteenth century, a plague hit Europe. Initially spreading through rats and subsequently fleas, it killed at least one-third of the population of Europe and continued intermittently until the 18th century. There was no known cure at the time, and the bacteria spread very quickly and would kill an infected person within two days, which led to structural public policies, religious, and medical changes in Europe. The plague had an enormous social effect, killing much of the population and encouraging new health reforms, it also had religious effects by attracting the attention of the Catholic Church, and lastly, it affected the trade around Europe, limiting the transportation of goods. As a response to the plague that took place
A modern day event that can be compared to the plague is Ebola. The Bubonic Plague led to an advancement in medicine and other health related practices. The outbreak of the plague caused sewer systems
Woosh! Everyone is in their homes, trying to protect themselves from the deadly disease sweeping through the countryside. That plague was the Black Death, and it killed nearly two-thirds of the population in Medieval Europe. Miasma, bad air, and rats are possible causes of the horrible plague Black Death. In exhibit D, titled “The Miasma”, it explains that Plague doctors wore strange masks to protect from Miasma.
Which, was not an uncommon number of deaths for that time period, due to the medical treatment and preventative drugs that where available. What is uncommon is this plague is it affected young men and not just the old or children. There are many different speculations as to what disease the Plague actually was, especially within the last century. Although, none have been proven yet. With the difference of opinion on the
Summary Chapter 5-9 According to Stocks for the Long Run, U.S. history is divided into three sub periods 1802-1870, 1870-1925 and 1926-1990, and Siegel analyzes the returns on stocks, bonds, and other assets classes over the last two centuries. Over the period from 1802 through 1990, equity provided returns greater to those on fixed income investments, gold or commodities. In addition, the real rate of return on equity held remarkably constant over this period, while the real return on fixed income assets decreased dramatically. Furthermore, over the sub periods 1802-1870, 1870-1925 and 1926-1990, the real compound annual returns on equity were 5.7, 6.6 and 6.4 percent; however, the real returns on short-term government bonds dropped. Thus, the magnitude of the excess return on equity during this century seems excessive relative to the behavior of other macroeconomic variables.
