Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan

581 Words3 Pages

Edmund Randolph presented Virginia Plan and it had 3 branches of government with 2 houses and the number of reps would be based on state’s population of wealth. The people elected the House of Representatives and the Senate was elected by the state legislatures. Both were represented proportionally. Length of term was 3-7 years. Paterson presented New Jersey Plan. It had only one legislative branch and had one house in the congress. It was completely different to what proposed in Virginia Plan it stated one to one vote that every state had right to vote once.Anyone should affliction about the Constitution, as the Architecture is totally the base of the state and the way that we live. Both plan had different congressional representation. The Virginia plan states that all the right will be given to the state and its legislature and they will chose the members. While in New Jersey Plan it was decided that every state will have the right to vote just once so that right of the minorities is protected (smaller states).We are consequently beneficial to exist in in the United States of America and believe the Constitution. Like Harry Truman asked that the accomplished meeting in capitalism is that of the national. …show more content…

Therefore according to this plan all the power regulated between the big states and they had the right to do whatever they wish to do. While the powers of New Jersey plan were that national government could import duty and also levy taxes. This gave them power to regulate trade and the state laws stood subordinate to other laws which were passed by national

More about Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan