Compare And Contrast The Vital Capacity Of Smokers And Non Smoker

In the report, one aspect I like is the clear organization and separation of the many different parts of the experiment into sections. This is an amazing idea for the audience who can clearly see which part of the experiment is being described in the report such as understanding the materials and methods used and knowing where to look in the report to find certain details. Furthermore, the report is organized in a chronological way so that readers will first be exposed to the introduction of the experiment before being exposed to the results and the discussion of their findings. In this sense, I like the organizational aspect of the report important because it makes the experiment of comparing the vital capacity between smokers and non-smokers easy to follow and to understand clearly what actions are being done and what results are being analyzed to find a conclusion.

I like this addition in the report because it increases the reputability and credibility of the experiment by giving proper credit for where the researchers found their information. The experiment is based on the comparison of “Lung Vital Capacities of Smokers and Non-Smokers” so information revolving around how lungs are affected by cigarette smoke and how lung function differs between smoking and nonsmoking adolescents is being used. Citing the information they used in the study prevents plagiarism and gives proper credit for previous studies and literature that they used. Since this report will be published in a journal for undergraduate students, the “Literature Cited” page will prevent the researchers from violating the academic honesty policy as well as guaranteeing their