Compare And Contrast Two Religious Groups

473 Words2 Pages

Muslims and Christians were two religious groups during the medieval period that were able to coexist despite their ideological difference. These two religious groups dealt with non-believers who did not accept their beliefs in different manners, Christians pushed their religion onto others while Muslims tolerated those that had other beliefs. The manner in which these religions were able to maintain peace with one another was through a pact which was proposed by the Muslims. The pact strengthen the military powers of both theses religious empires during the time period. The rise of power lead to the the religions growth in followers. The manner in which these religious groups dealt with non-believers of their faith are completely contrast, Muslims “required to pay an extra tax” on “non-muslim” affiliated people(Pact of Umar, Intro). The taxation the muslims added on to non-muslims was called the “dhimma” which insured that the they would be safe from any form of attack(Pact of Umar, Intro). Even though the tax was added towards the non-believers …show more content…

The “Pact of Umar [was] the peace offering by the Caliph Umar to the Christians” in order to reach a truce (Pact of Umar). The pact communicated how the Muslims felt towards the Christians, the pact stated how they would not interfere with one another but rather respect each other. The clauses these both religions agreed to were that if any rules were broken that “ the shall forfeit the protection of the pact”. Another way in which the power of these empires were fused and maintained was by “satraps, a system that communicated between officials and locals” in order to discuss issues in lower levels. The way these religions were able to strengthen their military was by creating trust through the pact. The pact by the muslims is what fused these political-military powers during the medieval