Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What truly caused the civil war
What truly caused the civil war
What truly caused the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What truly caused the civil war
In Makers of America: Billy Yank and Johnny Reb, it was interesting to learn that Union and Confederate soldiers shared a common commitment to fight for the cause of liberty, independence, and republican government. However, their interpretation of liberty, independence, and government are very different. The societies from the Union were more literate, intellectual, practical, and efficient. Therefore, they abolished slavery because they think it was immoral and favored a strong central government to make things efficient. The societies from the Confederate were more emotional, religious, and personal.
The confederacy got rid of their fiscal matters throughout the war through donations from people (voluntary), imposing taxes on many things, appropriation of northern owned properties in the south, distribution of government debt and printing of confederate dollars. The union had a lot more men who could be enlisted to the army where the confederacy didn’t have as much. The numbers of the
The Confederacy, by comparison, was a brand new government with a weak central government, and was not
Confederate Army had trouble arming all their troops .Confederate Army didnt have many uniforms, men usually just fought in what they brought with them .Confereate Army was better trained .Union had a bigger army .Union had a more powerful Navy .The
From 1861 to 1865, America experienced the tragedy of a division of her own people, North and South, whose hostilities toward one another exploded into a war which left the South devastated with defeat, and the North victorious, but uncertain of what that victory meant. It was to be expected that the armies on both sides would suffer hardships, but the southern civilians could not have been prepared for the lesson in privation which the war entailed. From the beginning of the war, the South was faced with the superior strength of the North. The northern states could boast of 22,000,000 people while the states of the new Confederacy contained roughly 9,000,000 inhabitants with Negro slaves constituting about 3,500,000 of this sparse population.
Now four long years later after the war, the North has won the Civil War, there were many key factors to the resulted to the defeat of the Confederacy they were not fully equipped with the right tools for success and an army that wasn’t properly trained. The confederacy had internal conflict with the slaves, they wanted to have their freedom and not have to fight against the other side that wants to give them rights. The Confederacy had 1/3 the population of slaves who wanted to be free and not have to keep being treated badly. There were many ways that the Union army had the confederates at an advantage. The key factors that led to the Union is they were well prepared and had the resources in order to defeat the Confederacy.
While the union armed force was much bigger their absence of combat zone experience added to the misfortune which likewise addresses General Grant's lack of common sense. The one blessed result of this fight is that it brought about an increment in hostile to war conclusion in the north and an abatement of General Grant's prevalence. The union eventually won the war. This fight made me make inquiries yet two of them stick out to me the most, How did the consistent contrast of Union to Confederate assets not play that enormous of a part in the fight? furthermore If this fight occurred before in the overland crusade would it have influenced the
As the Civil War began each both sides possessed significant strengths and weaknesses. The Union with a population of 22 million,
The union was superior to the confederacy in almost every way they could they had better factories, a lot more soldiers, and incredibly advanced technology. Epically when compared to the confederates weapons, soldiers and such to the northern. The union won the civil war do to their high-tech weapons that beat the confederates own weapons. The union had the numbers, with twenty-one million people in their twenty-three states.
The Confederate Army had much better leadership Union Army could replace soldiers much quicker Confederate Army fought a defensive war The Confederate Army had trouble arming all their troops Confederate Army didn't have many uniforms, men usually just fought in what they brought with them Confederate Army was better trained Union had a bigger army Union had a more powerful Navy The Union had better access to railroads. (More Americans died during the civil war then all the other wars America fought.) The most famous battles where Shiloh, Antietam, Stones River, and Gettysburg. Hundreds of thousands died of disease. African-Americans served in the in the Civil War on both the Union and Confederate side.
These people were also not able to join the military. Because of this, the Union could keep their economy strong throughout the war, as they focused on child and woman labor, whereas the Confederacy relied on men and young boys to do farm-work. The Confederacy’s economy was built on farms, which required strong men or teenagers to do the hard work in order to keep the economy strong. These same strong men would be enlisting in the military to fight.
The South even had some good naval weapons such as floating obstructions, underwater mines, and torpedoes. The Union Army had trained professionals, but so did the Confederates! the soldiers had a strong will to fight, and they even had strong military generals that went to military school. Plus, the Confederates having farmers is a good thing.
The Union and Confederacy both fought for freedom. Each side really just wanted their country to be at liberty. For the South, the war was “a battle for political rights and asserting state sovereignty against an overbearing federal government.” The North considered the war a matter of preserving the South and casting off the limitations of slavery. Believe it or not, there were more similar ideas.
Confederate History verses The People A big issue in today’s United States is removing Confederate history from the public due to the rise of killings involving race groups. Some will argue that doing away with Confederate history will some solve all problems; others argue that erasing Confederate history will not solve anything. The Solution to whether or not to erase Confederate history is to see if American’s history is better off with it or not.
What I think is that this story talks about the USA or the Union and the Confederacy, in the part that I am they are talking by the differences, the Union is the North, and the Confederacy is the South part, the Union of the North part is the one with 23 states and more population of course, the Confederacy has just 11 states but they have a lot of slaves all about them is in the picture bellow. Other thing about this story is that in 1860 the elected president was Abraham Lincoln; moreover to be a president he was trying to resolve the fight between the Union and the Confederacy. Even before the late 1800s, the US had begun to grow and change. The economy of the US grew as factories in the economy.