Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Washington and dubois comparative essay
Booker t washington's influence
Booker t washington's influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Washington and dubois comparative essay
Booker t washington's influence
Booker t washington's influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Washington was born a slave in the south. DuBois was born free and in the north. Washington believed that blacks should earn rights from hard work. DuBois believed that blacks should have freedom now. Washington said that blacks should stop agitating for voting and civil rights not only in exchange for economic gains and security, but also for reduced anti-black violence.
Dubois and Washington strategies were extremely different and the way they thought about going about equality. Washington was loved by whites he was not the one to get confortartional. Washington wanted blacks to sit around and wait. Whereas Dubois was hated and feared by whites. Dubois was an agitator.
He believed that African American economic gains were not secure unless there was political power to safeguard them. “I think, though, that the opportunity to freely exercise such political rights will not come in any large degree through outside or artificial forcing…" (Washington 234). They both believed in equality. Although one believed in used force and military movements the other used writing to reach his audience. While there were many points of contention between Washington and DuBois, there were similarities in their philosophies as well.
The main disagreement between the two philosophers was the issue of black suffrage. Dubois felt that un-educated blacks didn't deserve a vote. Without an education, he believed that there would be no economic gain in our country. Being that DuBois grew up in the North without prejudice and slavery, his outlook on education,
Booker T Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were significant black leaders during the late nineteenth century. Even though they had the same common goal, they had opposing strategies on how to carry them out. Booker T Washington was one of the most influential African-American intellectuals of the late 19th century. W.E.B Du Bois, was an intellectual scholar and political thinker.
But for an example Washington was born a slave and Dubois was born free in the north. Washington believed that if African Americans work hard enough in time they will achieve racial acceptance, and Dubois always believed that you should fight for what you want. Dubois said that “if you’re willing to give us an education you can gives us rights”,
Thesis statement: The two great leaders in the black community debating about the issues that face the Negro race and Du Bois gave a compelling argument by using pathos, logos and ethos to create an essay that will appear to all readers. Outline: This essay will showcase the contradicting philosophies between W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. Also, paying close attention to the different types of leadership between the two historic leaders in the black community. Both W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T. Washington contributed to and helped shape the future of African Americans.
Du Bois believes that Washington exhibits an old attitude of submission. Whereas Washington sees starting from the bottom as necessary and beneficial Du Bois sees it as submissive and harmful towards the progression of equality. Both Du Bois and Washington believed that their viewpoint was going to lead to more equal treatment and overall improved quality of life for African Americans. Both Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois had ideas on how to improve African American lives, Washington believed in starting at the bottom and working up whereas Du Bois had an opposing viewpoint he saw starting from the bottom as submissive and believed African Americans should hold important jobs in
1.Compare how Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois were raised. What kind of education did they have? Did these things affect their view of the world and if so, how? Booker T. Washington was born into slavery, yet had an other educational ways where he adapted in diverse stages through his childhood. He encountered various forms of early education during the time spent adolescence.
W.E.B DuBois’ plan was smarter than Booker T. Washington’s because DuBois’ plan was to fight for the rights of African Americans, and give people a good and equal education. Booker T Washington’s plan was to ignore segregation and discrimination so he can just focus on the wealth and education of former slaves to win over the whites acceptance. One part of DuBois’ plan was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP. This Association was one of the most influential civil rights organization. It “focused on legal strategies designed to confront the critical civil rights issues.”.
Although DuBois was not a slave, while Booker T. Washington was, that does not mean that Washington's views were superior to DuBois. Personally, I think that DuBois had a better argument due to the fact that he did not believe in dropping culture and history in order for slaves to not be discriminated against, and believed that african americans would have to deal with racial issues. I also think that in the end, neither of the views were able to be accomplished. There are still racial issues in America, and people of color are not always viewed in the best light due to stereotypes that people attach to african americans. Booker T. Washington believed in trying to have people of color, ask for help, and eventually gain enough to be able to help other cultures and races, and have this happen without segregation, and discrimination.
Dubois advocated political action he felt that change would only occur by developing a small group of college educated blacks called the talented tenth. Dubois started “The Negro Race, like all races, is going to be saved by its exceptional men” this statement only shows how he felt only a group of people could save one race.unlike the way washington felt on how all people could create change.dubois felt that people who were in college could do a better job in helping blacks get the equality we needed.he believed in a education farther than a trade was better for the black man or
Booker T. Washington was born a slave and worked as a janitor to get through school. Whereas W.E.B. Du Bois was born in the North and faced very little discrimination, and had an easier time getting into College. They were well educated, and the only difference between them was how they were raised in different environments. Both were on the journey to improve African American’s social and political status in America. However, they had different methods for getting what they wanted.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin. This quotes summarizes the dichotomy of the two most celebrated African American during the eighteenth hundreds. W.E.B Dubois and Booker T. Washington were the driving force behind the freedom and equality movement during the process of reconstruction. Even though they came from different backgrounds, education, and regions they both had a different and similar vision for African Americans such as how to add value to the community, legal and voting rights, and how to integrate themselves within the white community to become one Nation.
There are a few ways that Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. DuBois differ in their strivings for racial equality. The reason that these men differ in their views are pretty apparent and go back to the separate arguments that Jane Addams and Elizabeth Cady Stanton produced for women's rights in the 19th century. Jane Addams made some compromises in her push for women's suffrage to make her argument easier to swallow and take a small step towards equality. Stanton puts out her whole argument for total equality which made her argument hard for her generation to accept, but got all the problems on the table.