ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast War And The Shock Doctrine

1292 Words6 Pages

When speaking on the two points of the U.S. Empire of 1846 and the Shock Doctrine we see that at first glance then tend to have no relation. However, when you investigate and put thought into these two subjects, we see that there are similarities between the two. First, it is important to establish and identify what these two subjects are and their impact on the US. The U.S. Empire of 1846 consisted of a period of American history where the country acquired a significant amount of territory through military expeditions and negotiation strategies between other countries. During this time, we notice that the United States acquired and expanded westward, successfully acquiring multiple states. These states are known and identified as Texas, California, …show more content…

With presidents Martin Van Buren and William Henry Harrison both during these time periods we would see diplomatic ties with the US by Sir Andrew Jackson. This motive will later lead to a war with Mexico if political individuals proceed to try to achieve power of Texas. Which in result from the text we learn that Mexico tries to take over Texas and the US would respond with aggressive actions forcing the US and Mexico to declare war at the time for the annex of Texas. When the United States pushed to purchase Texas and Mexican California, we see that their attempt did not prevail whilst Mexico views this as an insult. Polk would act and ordered men to “take a bold, firm course towards Mexico.” causing General Taylor to prepare his men for war to not show weakness in this time.
The Mexican-American war ended in the year 1848. A process for citizenship was provided for Mexican’s living in the overruled areas, and America later paid around 15 million dollars for 525,000 sq ft for territory known as Mexican California. This later would lead to the US acquiring more land west earning ownership of New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and portions of Colorado and Wyoming. With the acquirement of these states this leading to the later period called the California gold rush and a numerous relocation in …show more content…

Disaster strategy is what Klein was known for and he stated another strategy that he argues about the fact of economically secured are able to be evacuated and the rest are left vulnerable and left there in the ruins. Klein recently speaks on the fact that he compares the hurricane to the tsunami and the affects it has on individuals such as their home and land. We see that the book does go against the fact that individuals were driven to the fact of obtaining more land and the idea of Manifest Destiny. It is all manipulation and the art of controlling foreign nations to benefit from other ways such as economically and even in politics at times which was stated in the A Wicked War Book. This is a book stating differences between nations over land rights and ownership. We notice that in the expansion to the west coast there was conflict whilst trying to obtain simple objectives driven by the motive of Manifest Destiny. This book shows the simple facts of the ideas of wanting to achieve something can lead to more aggressive outcomes which leads to a bigger effect on future events and

Show More
Related
1298 Words | 6 Pages

During the period spanning from 1800 to 1855, there were many arguments made in the ever-present debate regarding the possibility of the territorial expansion of the United States. The two arguments, pro-expansion and anti-expansion, were seen in debates over the Louisiana Purchase, the War of 1812, the removal of Indians from their territories, possible trade routes through expansion, and the Mexican-American War. These arguments made in the debate are seen in documents A, B, C, D, F, G, H, and I. The documents not only show the opinions of the people, but also the effect they had on the government. Pro-expansion sentiments were shown through debates concerning the War of 1812, the removal of Indians from their villages, possible

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

This included the negotiation of the Oregon Treaty with Great Britain in 1846, and the conclusion of the Mexican-American War in 1848. This war ended with the ratification of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo in 1848 being

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

The 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended and specified the major consequence of the war: the forced Mexican Cession of the territories of Alta California and Santa Fe de Nuevo México to the United States in exchange for $15 million. In addition, the United States assumed $3.25 million of debt owed by the Mexican government to U.S. citizens. Mexico recognized the loss of Texas and thereafter cited the Rio Grande as its national border with the United

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

During Polk’s regime, the ambitious, new leader focused on adding the Oregon country, taking California along with New Mexico from Mexico, and cutting taxes. By the time Polk had been inaugurated, Texas had already fallen into American hands; therefore, Polk prioritized the securement of the Oregon Territory. Polk was playing a dangerous game; if he tried to take the territory from Britain, war would be inevitable and many lives would be unnecessarily cost. Being the daunting character he was, Polk did not back down from a fight. However, his attention was divided because Mexican relations with the U.S. were degrading.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

With Polk’s narrow victory, the Democrats immediately called to admit Texas as a state, but was only successful by using a joint resolution,which included admitting Oregon as a state to satisfy Northern expansionist desires and balancing the number of slave-owning and free soil states. Not satisfied with these states alone, Polk turned to Mexico’s northern provinces (such as California and New Mexico) and endeavored to start a revolution in California. Polk’s audacious move to incite a revolution in California--done by sending Thomas Oliver Larkin to influence famous Californios to seek independence, seizing San Francisco Bay, and employing John Slidell to try to buy California--was met with greater tensions between the U.S. and Mexico for a war. These acts led to Polk utilizing more aggressive tactics to expand U.S. territory; Polk sent General Zachary Taylor to occupy disputed territory and “provoke a fight” (Pg. 419 Henretta), and the war concluded with American triumph. The war had started with patriotic expansionism, but soon divided the nation: the Whigs, who were against the war and did not support “this wretched cant about a ‘manifest destiny’”

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Polk and corresponding political course of his administration. But the author does not assert that it was solely Polk’s desires. Rather Polk is portrayed as an initiative follower of Thomas Jefferson’s and Andrew Jackson’s ideas about American expansion. The belief in potency of a new undeveloped land became the characteristic of that time. “By 1840s, territorial expansion was viewed by many to be a measure of that [America’s] greatness”.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

The United States has not always been made up of the fifty states that are identified today. The establishment of the fifty states took time. Many territories became a part of The United States though war and conflict. One of those controversial states was the state of Texas. The territory of Texas first belonged to Mexico, the neighboring country to the United States.

Read More
1431 Words | 6 Pages

Early in 1848, Mexico and the United States signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo . Mexico agreed to give up Texas and a vast region known as the Mexican Cession. This area included the present day states of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico, as well as parts of Colorado and Wyoming. Under this agreement, Mexico gave up half of all its territory. In return, the United States agreed to pay Mexico $15 million.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Mexican-American war altered the United States environmentally, culturally and politically. First, on February 2, 1848, Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo two years post the beginning of the war. The treaty not only achieved President Polk’s goal to achieve California from Mexico but also granted the U.S. over 500,000 square miles of new territory. The new land caused approximately 90,000 spanish speaking, mostly Catholic Mexicans under American jurisdiction. Second, Nativism, a rising anti-catholic and anti-immigrant deemed the Mexicans inferior.

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

How did California, The Golden State, become a part of the United States of America? The answer lies in the Mexican-American War. This controversial war was fought in 1846 under the presidency of James K. Polk, a strong believer in Manifest Destiny. It took place after the annexation of Texas and was a result of a dispute over land between the Nueces River and Rio Grande. The Mexican-American War was unjustified for three reasons, for one; Polk intentionally instigates the war with Mexico, secondly; the U.S. only wanted Mexican land to expand their own, and finally; in order to obtain this land, America violates Mexican laws.

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

policy towards the Mexican War of 1846. Dominated by the editors who strongly believed the concept of Manifest Destiny, the United States Democratic Review justified the war with Mexico. In the article titled, The Mexican War - Its Origin and Conduct, the author listed several reasons to war against Mexico such as the annexation of Texas, boundary dispute, the threat to the U.S. economic interests in the region and above all, the U.S. expansionist policy towards the West. Deeply influenced by the ideas of Manifest Destiny, President Polk framed his foreign policy in his presidency and successfully fulfilled the God-given mission to stretch the U.S. territory as far as the Pacific region, negotiate with the Great Britain to acquire the Oregon territory and sign the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo with Mexico in 1848. Without the ideas of Manifest Destiny, the U.S. expansionism would not thrive, the newly born democratic nation would not increase his territory astronomically and the young republic would not have enough political and economic power to be a giant at the stage of international

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

In this article Chandler addressed a widely glorified view of the manifest destiny spread by common textbooks in circulation in the United States. Chandler describes how this propaganda like belief as such, “One’s opinion about this central aspect of American mythology depends heavily on one’s point of view”(Chandler 153). This statement illuminates the factual idea that the manifest destiny, like so many other american historical events, is told from one perspective, which leaves a huge portion of american history untold. Later on, Chandler narrows in on the idea that the commonly held view on the manifest destiny leaves out the impact this westward expansion had on the “original inhabitants of North America, as well as its ramifications today”(Chandler

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

In 1846 The Mexican-American War began lasting till 1848. The United States acquisitive need for more land was their only motive for starting a war with Mexico. The United States started an unjustified war with the newly independent country just more territory. Polk stated that “The Mexican Government not only refused to receive him [the U.S. envoy] or listen to his propositions, but after a long-continued series of menaces have at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil.

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

America eventually captured Mexico City in September 1847. The Treaty of Guadalupe – Hidalgo was signed on February 2nd, 1848. It ended the Mexican – American war and started the Mexican cession. It also recognized Texas as a U.S. state.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Throughout the 1840s and 1850s a major war happened called the Mexican American War which drastically changed the U.S. and Mexico and lead to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to be signed and which established the Rio Grande and not the Nueces River as the U.S Border. This also lead to the U.S. annexation of Texas and lead to the Mexico agreeing to sell California and the rest of the territory for 15 million. So you 're probably wondering why the war was fought but you 'll find that out later.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast War And The Shock Doctrine

Related Topics

Open Document