Comparing Jane Goodall's Hope For Animals And Their World

749 Words3 Pages

Jane Goodall, a well-rounded primatologist that is well known for her long-term study of wild chimpanzees in Gombe, once stated, “The least I can do is speak out for those who cannot speak for themselves.” Goodall is known to have embraced her passion for the love of animals through her actions, writings and speeches. Her scientific essay, Hope for Animals and Their World, displays the use of diction to celebrate the importance of the underappreciated insect, the American Burying Beetle, while conveying her perspective that all animals, large and small, are indispensable to our natural world’s ecosystem. Within her argumentative essay, Goodall makes known the importance of the infrequently acknowledged creature, the American Burying Beetle. She …show more content…

She uses such word to demonstrate the possible reasons for the sudden reducement in the population of the American burying beetles in lines 71-75, “ One reason for the species’ precipitous decline across its historical range, in addition to habitat loss and fragmentation, is possibly connected with the extinction of the passenger pigeon and the greatly reduced number of black-footed ferrets and prairie chickens, all of which provided carrion of ideal size.” As seen in this short excerpt, the importance of other living organisms is essential to the welfare of these beetles for they provide a substantial amount of resources that allow the beetles’ species to prosper, and Goodall is seen to emphasize this idea with her use of the word “extinction” due to the fact that extinction is the absolute eradication of a living organism. Therefore, if there is one minor tweak in the equilibrium of our surrounding food chains, there will be a domino effect onto the affected species which will most definitely make an appalling impact onto many more species down the food chain