Comparing Legrand Richards, Lisa Nielsons, And Thomas Plummer

462 Words2 Pages

The reading in the second unit was a learning experience. In the reading LeGrand Richards, Lisa Nielsons, and Thomas Plummer showed their approaches of critical thinking. Each writer displayed the different and unique way to expand the thinking level of the reader. They expressed how to analyze and evaluate topics in order to create better judgment.
LeGrand Richards address giving at a BYU devotional expressed desires and regrets towards his BYU education. Richards was a fountain of knowledge as he revealed three beliefs of a proper BYU education. He focuses mainly on critically evaluating our education and the time as a BYU student. He teaches his audience of the current student to make the most of their opportunity. Their education should not be seen as a game and needs to be taken seriously. Richards believed that education should be an eternal goal. Our knowledge will better prepare us to accomplish our specific missions as disciples of Christ. LeGrand Richards also taught, that our knowledge is for the world. He wants his audience to “Enter to learn and go forth to serve.” Richards speech invites the listener or reader to ponder the importance of their education. …show more content…

She focuses on ways to develop critical thinking skills. Nielson teaches that critical thinking helps you avoid jumping to conclusions easily. It becomes less complicated to understand foreign ideas as skills to analyze complex information develop. She shares three main points to follow as a thinker. You must have the right attitude and world perspective, understand the analytical process, and last use evidence to come up with an opinion or a solution to a problem. Nielson wants everyone to have the freedom to process and explore complex ideas by critical