Comparing Letter From A Birmingham Jail And Resistance To Civil Government

452 Words2 Pages

The two essays "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr. and "Resistance to Civil Government" by Henry David Thoreau were authored at distant points in history (1963 and 1848, respectively) to very different audiences. Their core purpose and cultural impact, however, are nearly identical. Both writers founded their essays on a strong logical basis. They form an argument to those who are oppressing them, establishing what is morally right and how it differs from what is approved by those in authority. For example, Thoreau had a poignant metaphor about poll taxation: "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself". Similarly, Dr. King states in his letter "I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". By outlining individual morals they make their case against the government without resorting to violence or power tactics. …show more content…

Despite being indicted by the government, they insist that civil disobedience should be done in a non-violent manner that does not hurt others, establishing the moral high ground. Thoreau expressly says that he does not wish to quarrel or harm his neighbors, rather that he refuses to pledge his allegiance to an undeserving State, a right that should go unchecked by that government. Dr. King has a long record of calling for peace and demonstrating nonviolently, even when he would be well within his rights to defend himself morally. They are both pushing for negotiation and rational thought to prevail over unjust power