Comparing Oedipus The King And Antigone

552 Words3 Pages

In Oedipus the King and Antigone paradoxes contribute to Aristotle’s idea of tragedy arousing pity and fear in order to accomplish catharsis by developing deeper characters, creating higher stakes in the plot and playing with the audiences emotions. When Oedipus finds that he missed the truth all along and finds the prophecy true, he pierces out his eyes developing a paradox describing his character with deeper meaning, “The pain of the spikes where I had sight, The flooding pain of memory, never to be gouged out. . . Are you faithful even yet, you alone? Are you still standing near me, will you stay here, patient, to care for the blind?”(Oedipus. Exodos. 94-102). Blind to the truth, Oedipus possesses the physical ability to see through the duration of the play highlighting his ignorant characteristics and excessive pride after his physical blinding and discovering truth. Through Oedipus’ actions the audience feels pity for Oedipus, but at the same time fear of the unknown which releases during catharsis when Oedipus …show more content…

Who is the man here, she or I, if this crime goes unpunished? Sister’s child or more than sisters child, or closer yet to blood—she and her sister win bitter death for this!”(Antigone. Scene 2. 80-86). As a ruler, Kreon appears fair-minded however acts abusively with his power, filled with anger, raising the stakes in the play’s plot. Kreon’s paradox in personality introduces spontaneity as well as unforeseen possibilities for all characters to experience building up fear and later a greater release during the catharsis. Similar to how Kreon’s anger filled views add suspense in the plot for the audience and build towards catharsis Antigone’s paradoxical actions stimulate pity supporting Aristotle’s