The social perspective that resolves around the purpose of causation is disputable, what causes a person to take the life of several other innocent human beings? Zelda Knight, a researcher in the Psychology department at Rhodes University concludes that “Serial killers, however have lost the boundaries between fantasy and reality, between assertiveness and aggression” (22). Serial killers’ disconnection from morality has caused many to question their enigmatic presence and others to fear in unthinkable pain. Knight mainly focuses on the sexual motivation aspect. She speculates notions to the serial killer’s sadistic nature. Though Knight’s claim is logically valid; the argument lacks a flaw on the basis that a serial killer’s personality is the only reason he or she hunts for an ideal victim. …show more content…
Schulman, the editor of the Wall Street Journal, also argued on the behalf that serial killers are compelled by their sadistic instincts and derive sexual pleasure by inflicting pain upon their victims. The crucial variable in both Knight’s and Schulman’s reasoning contemplated the implication of sexual pleasure and with a fusion of psychological motifs. Knight argues that a murderer is perceived as trying to protect his or her delicate inner self, however; it does not mean people have consented to their atrocious crimes. Although the claim seems initially plausible and is supported by rhetorical evidence, it lacks validity. According to Knight serial killers are mostly linked to psychological disorders for example; narcissism, antisocial, and paranoia. Half of the victims that were brutality attacked by serial killers had no clue of the unfortunate events that lingered behind them. The immense impact of serial killers has lead individuals to question their mere