Nearly 400 years ago shame emerged as a technique for punishment and many have used it ever since. Even in puritan times, as seen in the historical novel, The Scarlet Letter, shaming, although it has some downfalls, has provided a useful way to prevent offenders from repeating their actions. Despite some critics believing that shaming has detrimental effects on an offender, shaming ultimately provides a more humane, economical, and effective way of punishing criminals, furthermore judges should use ignominy as a form of punishment. Some may believe that shame causes one to feel socially isolated, such as the main protagonist in Hawthorne's novel, The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne. After committing adultery and receiving the letter A, …show more content…
Petty crimes such as drunk driving, non-aggravated assault, and embezzlement can benefit from more judges using shame, but more serious crimes and criminals, like murder and murders need a strict punishment, not just shaming. Someone such as Charles Manson, a ruthless murderous cult leader, wouldn’t benefit from public humiliation and shaming; serious criminals like him need a serious punishment, like a prison sentence which he currently serves. Serious crimes need serious punishments not just shame yet, less serious crimes could reap the benefits of shaming. If judges began using shame for more petty crimes and reserve prison space for serious crimes a serious issue of the rising price for housing inmates could improve. To house just one prisoner per year could cost up to $40,000; thousands of taxpayers dollars go towards prison upkeep and the prisoners. If judges utilize shame for petty crimes the amount of inmates in federal prisons could possibly decrease. More recently one woman bought drugs with her children in the car with her. Instead of sending her to jail, officers explained that she had the option of prison or to take out an ad explaining what she did, clearly she chose to take out an ad. Keeping those that did petty crimes out of jail can save an enormous amount of money each year. Due to the fiscally attractive nature of shaming, judges should use shaming