ipl-logo

Comparing Skeptics And Celebrants Of The Internet

1321 Words6 Pages

I agree that under the current form of capitalism, the “really existing capitalism,” the Internet cannot play the role its “celebrants” see for it. Just like Robert W. McChesney, I do believe that both skeptics and celebrants of the Internet are not completely correct with their predictions or beliefs. Both sides exclude a political economic analysis which takes away from both arguments. I personally think that skeptics are not looking at the long term effects and uncertainty of social changes from the Internet, and celebrants are too optimistic and do not take into account the large capitalistic effects from the Internet. I would say though, McChesney dismisses the celebrants’ view too quickly and a bit too strongly. The Internet is on the …show more content…

The Internet is negatively impacting professional journalism and according to McChesney, is decreasing the quality. Newspapers are being hit the hardest, but all commercial news media are in some sort of stage of decay and the Internet is not only to blame, but capitalism itself; Newspapers though, are the most important because this is where most of the original reporting is done and no other media has manifested to take its place. Journalism is very important to democracy because it informs the people of what is going on in the government and helps them decide who they should vote for. Journalism is not only about the government, but informs the people on businesses, schools, and powerful institutions, all information needed to be free and self-governing; It makes it difficult to participate effectively in the electoral politics when the people do not know the candidates or the big issues. The decrease in investigating reporting also decreases the amount of political debates and decreases the amount controversial issues being brought up. I thought McChesney’s proposal of having a public investment in journalism was not at all an extreme idea and could help remedy future problems treating it as a public good along with the

Show More
Related
1532 Words | 7 Pages

He states that the internet is “the world’s most powerful engine for putting heads together” (Thompson 61) which means that the internet will close the gap between distant inventions and innovators. He also argues that the world’s most influential machine is “the Internet, which encourages public thinking and resolves multiples on a much larger scale and at a pace more dementedly rapid” (Thompson 61). By having the internet as a place to make connections between ideas, inventors, and innovators, it will not only expand their ideas but will also prevent the loss of

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone has a different view of technology and the internet, and how or if it is affecting us as people. In Nicolas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he offers his views on the subject. He expresses his concerns about what humans excessive internet use could be doing to the actual functioning of their brains. Lauren Brown and Kay Sanborn, both have their own ideas on the subject some of which agree with Carr and others that disagree. I believe that the internet and technology have their pros and cons and whether we see both views or just one is up to us.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Stories are no longer respectable and virtuous as they were at modern journalism’s beginning. Thus, by journalists Fallows and Rothman have named the media as unethical. Another way that modern journalists have transformed today’s media is that the media now relies on the popularity of its stories and articles. Journalist Jack Shafer uses his article, “The Rise and the Fall of the Obama Media Romance” as an example of popular opinion reflecting

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

He mentioned how the Internet is making people wanting quick information so they don’t have to read articles or think about any answers. Carr is talking based on his experience with the Internet, because he is including himself as one of the people who had been effected by the Internet. Any reader can notice the amount of first- hand knowledge on the Internet problem. Also, Carr spoke in his article “the Net is becoming a universal medium’’, that shows his readers that Carr is very relatable to anyone else using the Internet. This allows his readers to believe Carr’s judgment, that he used

Read More
246 Words | 1 Pages

One of Carr’s main arguments would have to be that he sees the internet as a benefit and also very harmful in the same sense. He speaks about how “The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer” and how it has been a useful tool to him. It has made it much easier and faster to research information

Read More
1311 Words | 6 Pages

Carr believes that we depend on the Internet more than just looking up the answers in the book ourselves. He is trying to prove that our generation is consumed by the Internet. In addition to this, I feel his argument is effective because he builds credibility with personal facts, using statistics, and making emotional appeals throughout the essay. He gives many details and examples to backup and support his argument. Nicholas Carr gives himself credibility by stating that he knows what’s going on in his own mind, this is where he is uses ethos.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” I disagree that his use of support doesn’t work to make his point in this essay because it is too biased. Carr’s article shows a lot of support to his hate towards the internet by quoting himself along with his other fellow writers who are a part of an older generation like Carr himself and only includes one study from University College London. Carr mainly focuses on his anecdotes to help support his essay which really doesn’t give the audience actual information, although he makes a compelling point that Google or the internet itself is making us stupid, but what Carr has not included was any evidence about the good parts about the internet. What Carr was lacking in his essay was that

Read More
1464 Words | 6 Pages

”(Friedman) Taking Friedman and Karp as an example plus himself, Carr thinks he can convince the world the impact of the web on the

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

Carr writes, “ I'm just seeking convenience, but because that way I THINK has changed”(33). For him, the internet is a way for him to access information quicker than using a book, or any other medium. This constant use of the internet has altered his thought process, in which he now it is easier for him to use the internet rather than reading a book. When writing about how the web has brought about change, Gladwell claims, “ Where activists were once defined by their causes, they are now defined by their tools. Facebook warriors go online to push for change (43).”

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

The media is a major source of information for voters. Voters depend on the media to make their decision on who to support and vote for. As much trouble as the media causes, they play a major role in our political system. The American President accurately depicts the political process.

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

“’I’m addicted to the Internet, I admit it.’ He wrote. ‘It has transformed the way I work as a senator, communicate with my children, and keep tabs on news and cultural developments.’” He was one of the many Americans that saw the potential in the internet. It can not only help adults in their daily activities, but it can also help educate children and young adults in modern problems that they will face.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Journalism today has much more appeal to emotions; it's not longer just the facts, and propaganda is used much more frequently in today's

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Clay Shirky, the author of “Does the internet make you smarter?” wrote about how ignorance has poisoned the internet with incorrect information. Not only does technology has its flaws, but so do books and novels dating back to the Protestant Reformation. Even though many people are against the internet Shirky reassures that if used correctly and appropriately, then it can become a very useful tool that can “tap our cognitive surplus”. The increased collaboration of technology is important to society for the reason that the internet is full of valuable knowledge that can be claimed very quickly and easily. Increased collaboration is absolutely a benefit.

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

The internet could be the most valuable invention that was made in the modern age. With the force of the web individuals basically can do anything. From learning how to cook to building a car. The possibility is endless. The modernization of the internet can have positive and negative effects on the world.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Nicholas Carr's argument against the internet was very strong, and it persuaded me. It is very difficult for me to go against his opinion. I agree that the internet is changing us, but not in ways we think. There are long-term effects of using the internet as often as we do. He states that the internet is changing the way our brains function such as having a shorter attention span, negatively changing the way we critically think, and negatively changing our reading skills.

Read More

More about Comparing Skeptics And Celebrants Of The Internet

Related Topics

Open Document