ipl-logo

Comparing The Bundestag And The House Of Commons

535 Words3 Pages

Although many people see the bundestag and the House of Commons as similar governmental systems I believe that the Bundestag is more powerful and representative of their electorate compared to the House of Commons in Great Britain. The bundestag has the task of starting legislation, representing the public, and can control the executive unlike the House of Commons which only deals with laws and proposals. While both the bundestag and the House of Commons are elected. The bundestag is distributed with the idea that the voters have two votes in the election. One is to elect a local representative into the bundestag and the second is to decide party strength within the bundestag with at least 598 of the 630 being elected this way. The house of …show more content…

They start a vast majority of the legislation, and even the proposed bills that originate in the bundesrat have to come through the bundestag for approval. This makes it a powerful part of the legislature because they get to control what comes to the floor when and if it will indeed pass and start becoming a law. Another power that the bundestag has is that it controls the executive. It can put forth a positive vote of no confidence where they can replace the chancellor as long as they have another one in line to take over. Although they have tried it twice in the past it has only worked once. This power alone even if they do not use it very often helps to keep the executive in line especially because the chancellor is the one with the real power as the president is more symbolic like the monarch. The other power is to represent the public in the political process. They are the only federal representatives to be elected directly by the public which allows for them to be held accountable for their actions if they do not properly represent their population much like how the representatives in the house in the United States can be easily replaced at the end of their term if they are not truly

Show More
Related
245 Words | 1 Pages

This guards against tyranny because neither of the governments can gain powers over the nation or the people. Since, the Legislative branch is the one that makes the laws, the Executive branch carries out the laws (enforces), and the Judicial branch

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

This keeps the legislative and judicial branches of government under checks because it allows the president to stop anything unjust from happening; they can also choose who not to nominate as a judge if that nominee doesn't fit the executive branch's

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

This divides power between 3 departments that can also stop each other from having too much power. The way the 3 branches check each other is the legislative branch can check the president by overriding his veto but the president can veto congressional legislation, the legislative branch can check the supreme court by impeaching judges and removing them from office but the supreme court can declare laws unconstitutional. The supreme court can check the president by declaring presidential acts unconstitutional but the president nominates the

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

Call it a house of Europe. Call it a house of Africa. Call it a house of Asia. Of central or south America. Call it a house of the Middle East.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

This separation of powers helps to prevent abuse of power. Followed by separation of power, it is necessary for each branch to be able to limit each other so that no one part becomes too powerful. Checks and balances is also an important factor, it lets each branch limit the power of others. Legislature checks the Executive in the ability to impeach presidents and pass laws, “If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House…” (2: Source A). It checks the judicial by impeaching justices.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

It provides the overall structure of our democratic government. By separating powers into three branches and creating a system of checks and balances between the branches, it continues a long tradition in American

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

In a representative democracy and in socialism there are checks and balances. In the US, the judicial branch can look at laws and rule them unconstitutional. For legislative, congress can overturn presidential vetoes and treaties with 2/3 vote from both houses, can reject nominations of judges, and can impeach the president. In a socialist government, prime ministers do not have many limitations, but countries like Canada do not have fixed term lengths so Prime Ministers can either stay for a long time

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

¨There is nothing on this earth more to be prized than true friendship¨- Thomas Aquinas. In the story of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck the two main characters in the book are named George and Lenny. They represent this quote. The book is about George and Lenny and their goal to achieve the american dream by owning their own ranch. George is the leader between the two because Lennie has a smaller brain and can 't comprehend a lot.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

“The ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative.” This quote directly represents and defines what the American Dream is - and that is the dream of achieving a your goals and becoming successful in a legitimate way. And by using this reason one can deduct that Jay Gatsby did not infact achieve the American Dream. He may have been rich, but that is not all to the American Dream. To achieve the American Dream you must accomplish all your goals in life and he did not do that.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate and House of Representatives comprise the two chambers of the United States Congress. While both houses are representative bodies and jointly oversee the executive branch, both must approve all bills before the president, but both chambers have different roles according to the Constitution. The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned to the house from across the United States. States with larger populations receive more seats within the house.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

The other part of the puzzle consists of the Executive branch of government. This branch consists of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. The Prime Minister runs the Cabinet; he/she controls the ministerial appointments (Parl., 2012). Being responsible for government policy, it is crucial for the Cabinet to have confidence of the House of Commons (Parl., 2012). Not everyone can be a part of Cabinet, so the Ministers who are chosen by the Prime Minister are “Members of House of Commons… and at least one Senator… who serves as the Leader of the Government in the Upper house (Parl., 2012).

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Germany has a mixed system electoral system with a proportional purpose. It provides for the election of a first half of elected single member majority in one round, then the election of a second half by proportional multi member ballot. After World War II, the Federal Republic of Germany transferred power from the President toward the Bundestag and encouraged political majorities to pass legislation. Germany 's current system emphasizes a strong party discipline between the executive and legislative branches.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Westminster system of government comprises of a democratically elected lower house. After the executive members the head of government is the prime minister. The next system that falls in place is the opposition which is led by the leader of the party or the parties with the second largest number of seats in the lower house. It follows that in the British system the prime minister and the cabinets are fully in charge of Parliament.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Bagehot once described this feature “as the close union…of the executive and legislative powers.” Unlike the presidential system, which is in operation in the USA, the parliamentary

Read More

More about Comparing The Bundestag And The House Of Commons

Related Topics

Open Document