In chapters 14 and 15 of Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer becomes more than just an investigator or a narrator, he becomes a character. He tells his story of climbing the Devils Thumb, which exposes the similarities between himself and McCandless. This aids to his understanding of McCandless’s motivations, without ever meeting him, due to the parallels in their personalities and family issues. Chapter 14 is devoted to Krakauer’s story about his youthful love for mountain climbing. At age 23, he plans to do a dangerous climb on the Devil’s Thumb in Alaska alone. “
Krakauer also put some of McCandless’ journals and letters in the book. According to Shaun Callarmans analysis Chris McCandless had no business going to Alaska. Callarman thinks Chris McCandless is just plain crazy. Callarman doesn't admire his courage or noble ideas. Even though Shaun Callarman thinks Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant, also made mistakes because of his arrogance, I disagree with Callarmans analysis
“He wasn’t a nutcase” (85). Why does Krakauer use this euphemism? Krakauer uses this euphemis because he believes that McCandless wasn’t insane, he was clever just the way he is. He follows what he wanted to be and what he wanted to become, he didn’t back just because people said he wasn’t like other people, who would have jobs and build a family.
Throughout chapters 8 and 9, the author showed his bias towards Chris McCandless, which is an act of defiance to his position as an objective journalist, when he attempted to alter the readers’ negative point of view towards Chris by the introduction of different people who had similar experiences and characteristics as him and then making comparison. After reading the previous chapters, the readers have already made their own judgement on Chris, which are probably mostly negative. To address this issue, Krakauer initiates chapter 8 by introducing negative comments and mails not only about Chris but also to him, the author. These will serve as an argument that he will later attempt to disprove while at the same time, still informing the readers about what makes Chris special and unique.
Born in A Different Life Life on the road is an idealistic way to escape from societal problems. There is no denying that it grants individuals satisfaction by allowing them to fulfill their goals, as well as providing immense freedom and control over one’s life; however, it is a fundamentally illogical path to take due to nature’s malevolence. In Into The Wild, Krakauer writes a biography about a young man named Chris McCandless, in which he illustrates the similarities between himself and McCandless’s overly ambitious journey to accomplish feats in the wilderness. Coinciding with their similarities, they also faced an oppressive father figure at home, which lead the both of them to believe that their journey will provide them an answer to their problems at home. McCandless planned to survive in Alaska by living off the land while Krakauer wanted to be the first one to climb the Devil’s Thumb.
An attribution to Jon Krakauer’s convincing overall argument is his thorough and plausible research formulated to create Christopher McCandless’s biography. Krakauer conducted a copious set of interviews with various people; he consulted specialists and scientists, and others in their respected professions. Krakauer also ventured in McCandless’s footsteps and studied into other adventurers cases. The “sources” Krakauer uses to devise his argument range from the people “close” to McCandless such as friends and family, people Alex (Christopher) met during his journey, professionals (police officers, rangers, scientists, professors, authors, etc.), those that found McCandless’s body, Alaskan locals, and letters from the readers of his Outside
In Into The wild, Krakauer narrates the last couple of journeys Mccandless had on his adventure to Alaska where he ultimately died. Mccandless Touched many people's lives through all of his journeys. Mccandless went on these journeys because he was confused in life when he figured out his dad had cheated on his mom. This changed Mccandless to the point he began to hate his parents. Mccandless had a lot of confidence in himself so he left on an adventure to find his identity.
Danger has always held a certain allure... McCandless, in his fashion, merely took risk-taking to its logical extreme” (Krakauer 182). There was no way to stop him from getting to Alaska, he lived in the Fairbanks city bus 142 for 112 days which is now commemorated in his honor. Most people see McCandless as an idiot who took on challenges he could not handle and dies in the process but from a readers point of view McCandless is a man brave enough to go on a voyage to find himself something most people cannot
Christopher McCandless, a foolish, narcissistic young man confidently ventured into the Alaskan wilderness unprepared and paid for it with his life. At least that’s what some people believe about him, but McCandless was more than just a foolish kid. McCandless was a courageous young man that dropped the luxurious lifestyle given to him to follow his heart and live naturally in harmony with nature. McCandless was the embodiment of great philosophers’ ideas such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, he was morally driven and had dreams that nothing was going to stop him from reaching, and in many people’s eyes, that made him completely unworthy of the injudicious, woefully naive title he was given by hundreds of critics. Christopher McCandless, the central figure in Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into The Wild, was an ambitious man that developed
His trek to Alaska showcases his bravery and courage in facing an uncertain future and forging his path. This is shown by this quote, “We just have to have the courage to turn against our habitual lifestyle and engage in unconventional living,” (Krakauer). This journey is not only a departure from his comfort zone, but it also makes him self-sufficient, using the knowledge he acquired to create a home in Alaska and subsist off the land.
During the time the author spends covering Chris’ family life and speaking with various family members, he documents that “Christopher Johnson McCandless came into the world with unusual gifts and a will not easily deflected from its trajectory” (106). Upon reading this, it’s clear that Krakauer believed McCandless to be a gifted and determined person, with redeemable attributes. Said statement could sway readers to take a second glance at the author’s opinion, and consider the positives McCandless has to offer as a strong will is perhaps a quality many long for. To have the ability to stick to what you want and work hard for it is surely Regardless of all the exceptional experiences many had with the young man, Jim Gallien was not the only one to see Chris’ stubborn, more negative side. Along his travels Chris got a job working at McDonalds in Bullhead City, Arizona.
Have you ever wonder why Jon Krakauer decided to write the book called “into the wild”, based on Mccandless’ travel? There are many reasons why he wrote this book but one of those reasons is that he identifies himself with Mccandless 's story and he wants to explain what actually happened. In addition, Jon Krakauer and Mccandless are two different persons but they also have many things in common such as ,that they have almost the same reason why they are not satisfied with life and that most of the society did not agree with them. Many people learned to never stop fitting for your dreams from Chris Mccandless and Jon Krakaue . Who is Christopher Mccandless?, Christopher Mccandless was an American hiker and traveler.
However, Jon Krakauer proves his argument that McCandless was not arrogant, foolish, antisocial, or crazy by giving examples of other young men who were similar to McCandless to show that his journey wasn’t unprecedented. He also proves that McCandless wasn’t antisocial because he developed personal relationships with Ronald Franz, Wayne Westerberg, and Jan Burres in such a short amount of time and explaining the many times that McCandless respected the Alaskan Bush. Krakauer admits that McCandless may have suffered from hubris; he was still a victim of circumstances. Krakauer proves that McCandless had an intrinsic motivation to discover and that he wasn’t alone because Krakauer too ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was younger. The Alaskan Bush is a very difficult place to survive if one isn’t prepared for many challenges such as hunting for food or staying warm in the frost ridden
For example, Krakauer employs Ron Franz’s account of Chris and mentions how Franz “regards the world through wary blue eyes” because of Chris’ death (59). Franz’s account evokes emotion to demonstrate the indelible impression Chris has on those he meets. Krakauer loads his story with emotion to allow the readers to sympathize with Chris’ plight; thus, Krakauer’s emotions influence his writing which prevents his ability to remain objective. Moreover, the author recalls the “wrenching loneliness” of his own journey with the Devil’s Thumb in Alaska (151). Krakauer recounts the hardships of his journey to indicate Chris’ emotional state during his journey.
His journal also holds words of disappointment in his last days. He speaks of his desperate and progressively futile efforts to survive. His journal entries were also published. The new York times published his journal entries which lead to his story being published by Jon KrakAuer. Both men’s journals are the only evidence of their dream being pursued in the wilderness of