The use of the scientific method is something that has traveled the world giving new thoughts towards identifying and implementing the works of the scientific truth. However, its work does not support anything with dealings of the scientific method. In no way, shape form or fashion can any individual identify or discover any forensic information using the scientific method. The newly modified version named, the forensic science method, gathers information secured by investigators which varies from findings at the crime scene to observable proof. The information found provides verification of the witnesses’ story being either the truth or a lie. It is also greatly used to determine information of the previous incidents. The confused relationship that is shared between the scientific method and the forensic science method will create incorrect endings.
With prior knowledge of the confusion of the methods of forensic science method and the scientific method, it seems to be almost redundant to
…show more content…
Foretellers present information of something that is prone to happen in the near future, not the past. The scientific method’s intentions are to find out the outcome of a certain instance. When a discovery is made, science can only tell how the discovery was encountered and use retrodiction as to how it got there.
When using the scientific method, you would know that designing experiments or creating controlled observations plays a big when in search for the hypothesis. Consequently, this is not possible when determining what happened in the past. Experiments are defined as “a scientific procedure undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact”, meaning that a different route must be taken if the results are not expected. The exact moment cannot be found and neither can the order of which something happened. It is not known to full detail, but the guess can come very