Comparing 'The Land And To This Day Project'

635 Words3 Pages

Slam poetry is a form of spoken word art that has taken the world by storm. It allows poets to express themselves through powerful, often personal, performances. In this essay, I will be discussing two poems that explore different themes using slam poetry. The first poem is "The Land" by Hugo Farrant, and the second is "To This Day Project" by Shayne Koyczan. Both these poems are powerful in their own way, and use poetic techniques effectively to convey their message. "The Land" by Hugo Farrant is a powerful depiction of the relationship between man and nature. The poem draws on imagery and metaphors to portray the beauty and power of nature. In the opening lines, the poet says, "The land is a living thing. Breathing, watching, waiting. It measures our lives in minutes and hours, not in years." The use of personification here creates a sense of mystery and intrigue that draws the reader in. The poet goes on to describe the beauty of the land, saying, "Its rolling hills and lush green pastures, its winding rivers and vast open spaces. It's a …show more content…

The phrase "the land" is repeated throughout the poem, creating a sense of importance and reverence for the subject matter. This repetition also emphasizes the themes of continuity and connection, as the land is presented as a constant force that outlasts human life. Another poetic technique used in "The Land" is alliteration. The line "a place where dreams are born and broken" uses the repetition of the "b" sound to create a sense of movement and fluidity. This technique is effective in conveying the idea that the landscape is constantly changing and evolving. In contrast, "To This Day Project" by Shayne Koyczan is a deeply personal exploration of bullying and its impact on individuals. The poem draws on Koyczan's own experience of being bullied as a child, and uses vivid imagery and powerful metaphors to convey the emotional pain of this