ipl-logo

Comparing The Play And Film Version Of The Crucible '

720 Words3 Pages

The 1997 award winning The Crucible, for the critic’s choice movie award for best supporting actress, was an outstanding written play and film. Out of the two alterations of The Crucible, David Hytner’s 1996 film version of The Crucible is by far the most accurate and best representation of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. This is for many reasons such as the following; Daniel Day-Lewis did the best job at characterizing the character of John Proctor, the film version of The Crucible provides the audience with a more in depth image of the Puritans, and the film version reached a much wider array of viewers. Daniel Day-Lewis’s portrayal of John Proctor in David Hytner’s 1996 version of The Crucible provided more depth to this character than the original script, written by Arthur Miller. This is due to his glorified past. Daniel takes much pride in how intense his passion for acting is, which results in outstanding performances. People might describe him as a perfectionist when it comes to acting. This was greatly noticed in Hytner’s The Crucible. Daniel describes his method in his outstanding performances through this quote, “ I don’t rehearse if I can help it. In talking a character through, you define it. And if you define it, you kill it dead.” …show more content…

Although it was a good representation, these reasons still are not good enough reasons for it to be better than the film. The film version reached a much wider range of audience due to innovations in technology compared to the written version. This is because most people nowadays tend to stray from written versions of literature and tend to be more inclined to watch something on film rather than read or view a play. This is another major reason why the Hytner’s version is the best version of The

Show More
Related
473 Words | 2 Pages

Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible as an outlet for what experiences he was going through during the Red Scare. It is no surprise that Arthur Miller would put things in The Crucible that he and others were going through during The Red Scare. Arthur Miller made these characters the way they are because of his experiences during The Red Scare. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller wrote himself as John Proctor and he purposely made him the way he is and what he goes through. John Proctor and Arthur Miller are parallels of each other in the way of being accused by their own government, not signing the names of communists/witches, and people’s reputations were ruined.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

The Crucible was written by Arthur Miller that connects to the witch trials that people faced in the village of Salem during 1692-1693 which put people in fear of being executed. Main differences that are seen in the play and comparison of the movie are the time lengths, The play is longer then the movie and there can also be differences in the setting of the play. The setting of the play takes place in a room filled with audience, The movie takes place in various locations throughout the entire movie. There are obvious differences in the location setting by two audiences seeing the full story by either a play or a film version. Certain differences between the play and the movie are the characters, there is a big difference in a few characters

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

In 1953, Arthur Miller wrote a play named The Crucible. This particular play conveyed the hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials that occurred in 1692, and became a drama captivated by many. Due to all of the attention, it was eventually made into a movie. Despite the fact that the movie followed the general storyline of The Crucible, there were some differences from the text and the adaptation of the story on screen.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

In the play along with the movie The Crucible, John Proctor and Abigail Williams have interesting relationship bound by adultery and lies. Abigail becomes obsessed with John and will do anything to be with him. John quickly shuts down her fantasy ideas and tells her that what happened between them was a one-time thing that will never take place again and a mistake on his part. With this knowledge, she soon spends all her time plotting to get John all to herself and to make him fall in love with her, even if that means taking out John’s wife, Elizabeth. We see many examples of this forbidden relationship through their secret encounters and arguments in both examples of the story, still, there were more scenes of John and Abby alone in the movie than in the play.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

The story “The Crucible” is a play written by Arthur Miller that has a great historical background with a deep-rooted storyline about people who challenge each other and their beliefs. The interesting characters bring life and imagery to the complex storyline. Two of the characters, Abigail Williams and Mary Warren, shape the outcome of The Crucible tremendously. Abigail and Mary are two teenage girls who not only get themselves into a sticky situation, they also learn valuable life lessons that take the story on many twist and turns. Abigail and Mary have similar lives until a fun day in the woods change their future forever.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

It is of the utmost necessity to analyze all pieces of evidence in order to reach a valid conclusion on one’s nature. If just one component is removed, then the entire decision is altered. 2.2 presents the audience with the final piece of insight on the true intentions of the characters that is needed to fully define their

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The Crucible Historical accuracy Remarkably, Arthur Miller instigates “The Crucible”, with a note that entails the historical accuracy of the play since he wanted to prevent people learning the history of Salem Witch Trials from reading the play and consequently, take it as a true representation of events. The note emphasizes that the play is not historic (Bloom 143). Miller was trying to insinuate that he was not rewriting history but in lieu structured his characters to fit in the play. I, therefore, discovered that this historical fiction is basically based on creativity that whatever is cast in films does not necessarily reflect what transpired in real history. However, the play is not historically accurate since there is a change of characters with an aim of enhancing the entertainment quality of the play.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

“It is part of a good man to do great and noble deeds though he risk everything.”, Plutarch. In the play The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the actions of a good man are portrayed. John Proctor, a man during the time of the 1692 Salem witch trials, exhibits noble traits during the play. In the play, Proctor strongly believes in honesty, and attempts to find justice no matter the circumstances. Proctor is not a man who will put himself before others.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, which is an embellished and somewhat novelized story of the Salem witch trials of 1692, offers the audience a protagonist, John Proctor, who is defined by the struggles that worry him. Where a strict theocracy rules Salem, the bible is the law, and all who do not follow the rules entirely are serving the devil, John Proctor portrays the classic tragic hero, where his moral errors and sacrifice for his morals becomes the cause of his untimely death. At the cost of his principles, he underwent a major survey of his character, which leads him to understand that the only way to redeem himself for his moral sins was to sacrifice his life. Proctor’s principal value is his sense of personal integrity, and this places him into a direct, and ultimately dreadful confrontation with the court set up to test the accusations of witchcraft.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

“Character Analysis over The Crucible” Arthur Miller is a commonly-known playwright, most famous for his 1953 play, The Crucible. The basis for The Crucible came from the witch trials which occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during the puritan era. Miller even uses some of the same characters in his dramatized play that were a part of the original witch trials in Salem. However, Miller made a few alterations to the historical members of the Salem society in order to suit his dramatic purpose in The Crucible, particularly Abigail Williams, John Proctor, and Reverend Samuel Parris.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

JOHN PROCTOR: TRAGIC HERO Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a greatly revered work, and it reflected the times of America in the days of McCarthyism. Perhaps the character that connected to the audience most was John Proctor, the protagonist of the play. He reflects the mistakes that we have made in our lives, and the struggle that some of have while trying to take the blindfold off of other people. He should be considered a hero because he feels guilt, and therefore tries to make up for the fact that he once had an affair.

Read More
1779 Words | 8 Pages

In Arthur Miller's play, dignity and reflection of one's self plays an important role in what makes up a person's character. Through John Proctor's actions and words, Miller's element of tragedy that emphasizes laying down one's life for personal dignity is demonstrated in The Crucible as people will go any extent to accomplish their desires and fight for their beliefs, despite the consequences because they are trying to protect who they are. Tragedy lies within

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

Matthew Raeter LA ll Honors Mr. Novak December 5 2022 The power of Reputation Throughout the historical fiction story “The Crucible” we see Arthur Miller uses difference in ideas Mr. Proctor’s world crumble, from the outside while he can do no more than just watch. Nearly everything we see Proctor cares for gets hurt or damaged in some way, First his wife begins to distrust him and hate him because of an affair he had with Abigail Williams. In The Crucible Proctor deals with the guilt of the affair he had with Abigail and how this sparks Abigail's control of Salem through her Manipulation and her given power of the people by them because of their misguided trust.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

The threat of Communism and the Red Scare put fear of group mentality into many people during the late 1940-50s.   The authors of 1984 and The Crucible used their respective works to comment on the social injustice going on in their own lives, which connects to injustice the exists throughout time anywhere in the world. Miller wrote his play, set in 1692, about Puritans and the Salem witch trials because he believed that, similar to his trial for HUAC in the 1950s, the trials in Salem were caused by false accusations and mass hysteria led by powerful individuals. In 1984, Orwell creates a world in the near future that shows group mentality and its threat to conform society with the government.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The world is full of love and desire but also has lots of hate and cruelty which all adds up to a world full of drama. The Crucible is an exciting thriller and shows many how lies end up catching up to you. In the end, Proctor is both dramatic and cruel. He deceits lies even though he lied about his affair with Abigail. They say if you tell the truth it always does you good.

Read More

More about Comparing The Play And Film Version Of The Crucible '

Related Topics

Open Document