ipl-logo

Comparing The Singer Solution To World Hunger And Poverty By Peter Singer

560 Words3 Pages

c) Peter Singer’s solution to World hunger/poverty “The Singer Solution to World Hunger/Poverty” is an article written by peter singer where he argues that our patterns of spending money is immortal because the money we are wasting on luxury, which are things that are not needed for survival, could be used to help save many children lives that are dying of starvation. Singer states that whatever we don’t need for survival, which are our fancy diners, new clothes, and our vacation, that all the money we are spending on those things are morally impermissible and the money should be donated to a charity like UNICEF to help save children’s life. Singer states that we are morally responsible for any act that we knowingly failed to prevent that does not result in the greatest good for the greatest number. He provided an example of a guy named Bob who had to decide if he should save a child’s life from a runaway train or if he should save his Bugatti. Of course, Bob chose to save his car instead of the child’s life and while Bob did not physically kill the child, he is still responsible for the death of the child. Singer states that we are just like Bob is because we spend our money on luxury when there are many children dying of starvation in the …show more content…

Singer also states that people may not help because they think that the government or other people will help, but in reality, the government doesn’t do much to help other countries and others are not donating as well, so it is our moral responsible to donate

Show More
Related
676 Words | 3 Pages

In Singer’s essay, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” the author begins by presenting the reader with the heartfelt scenario of the cost of a child vs. the cost of a new TV. Singer discusses how child trafficking with the intent of organ harvesting is the equivalent of purchasing a brand-new TV because in both cases one can improve conditions for children around the world, either by saving their life or by donating money to help them. Next, Singer goes into the narrative of a man named Bob. Bob has his entire life savings put into a precious Bugatti. However, Bob must make the choice to save his car or to flip the lever and save a child stuck on the railroad tracks.

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

The Singer Solution to World Poverty” written by Peter Singer. In the essay that Peter Singer wrote has a main point which is to give solution to the world poverty and how to deal with with the situation to end it. The article narrates that the philosophy Peter Singer demonstrate about the world poverty.

Read More
1699 Words | 7 Pages

In Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he argues the importance of donation to poor people, which could mean the difference between life and death for children in need. He gives an example for Bob, who has an opportunity to save a child’s life, but he could lose his worthy car. He makes a comparison between people who are capable to donate money to save children lives and people who have no chance to help or donate under certain situation such as Bob. He also encourages people who are in the middle class to donate at a minimum of 200$; furthermore, he thinks that people should donate more like 200.000$ when they consider the level of sacrifice that they would demand of Bob’s situation. He gives some estimates for the amount of donations that people should give to overseas.

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

By providing a specific number, $200, Singer demonstrates how simple and reasonable it is to save a child in poverty. Additionally, he repeats, “to save a child’s life,” which demonstrates exactly what a $200 donation could do for a child in poverty. As an example, Singer references a credible philosopher, Peter Unger, and acknowledges that “by his calculation, $200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old.” Next, he establishes, “if you were to give up dining out just for one month, you would easily save that amount.” Singer emphasizes this to show the reader how simple it is to save $200, and, more importantly, save the life of a helpless child.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Peter Singer argues that prosperous people should donate their excess money to the overseas aid groups. When saying this, he believes Americans should stop spending their money on luxuries such as a TV, a computer, a car, and videogames. Instead of spending money on items such as that, he thought we should start sending money to those who are starving in other countries and need our help. There are pros and cons to Singer’s argument and both can be greatly supported.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Singer himself writes, “We can give to organizations like Unicef or Oxfam America” (Singer, 737). If the wealthy people were to help the poor out, there is no reason to bother in using children of the poor to feed the wealthy. The money that will be provided can go into making shelters in which those children can live happily. There is no reason for those who do not trust organizations, to be selfish. They themselves can create their own organization, give children shelters and their parents a job as well.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

In Singer’s article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Singer’s main conclusion is that people should give up their luxury spending or over spending of money on things that are not really needed. Instead of spending it on things that are not really needed, people should donate that money to organization or charities. Theses organization or charities really do need the money to help people who are in need. For example, instead of buying your dream car, you should use that money that you were going to spend, in organization or charities that will use that money for people who are in very poor condition or have medical diseases, due to money there is no medicine for them.

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

With poverty being one the world’s biggest issues, it is essential that we shine some light upon this matter. An author, Peter Singer, wrote “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” and he argues that the amount of money we spend on ourselves instead of helping someone in need is immoral. As Singer said, “world poverty can largely be solved if we in the wealthier nations did our moral duty and gave much more than we currently do to those in greatest need” (230). We are a society that does not really like to share a piece our wealth with someone else because of all the hours we did just to get that paycheck. To make this statement more credible, Singer uses facts and statistics from the Conference Board and other sources, personal facts and giving

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Singer ties this back to the opportunity that many have to save the lives of children by sending money to charities but choose not

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Money: the root of most social problems and one of the few matters that almost everyone has an opinion on. Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” a newspaper article, is no exception. Singer argues that one should donate all unnecessary money to the less fortunate because of the morality of the situation. However, though the goal is noble, his commentary is very ineffective due to its condescending tone, lack of hard facts, and overall extremism. The piece is written by Peter Singer, an Australian professor of bioethics at Princeton University.

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

Singer advises people to not follow Bob’s actions. Singer wants people to redeem themselves like Dora, and donate money as much as they could. Singer believes that if everyone would only spend on necessities then people would have money to save a child’s life. Therefore, Singer’s solution to world’s poverty would be successful by adding that people could donate to their own preference of charitable organization and donate as much as they

Read More
1805 Words | 8 Pages

Due to this reason, Singer states that the fair donation argument fails and would not be enough to fix the problem. Now that we have an understanding of Singer’s beliefs, I can show how Singer would respond to the question given in the prompt. Peter would say that yes he should donate, but the small amounts he would be choosing to donate would be nowhere near the amount that he should be choosing to give. Singer would say that any money that he isn’t spending on necessities should be donated to help those in dire situations, and that not doing so is

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Singer attempts to close this gap with the age old question of ‘why don’t we give the riches’ money to the poor’. The essence of Singer’s argument is obviously end world poverty. Probably the strongest point made in Singer’s argument is the involvement of the whole world. By taking this money from those across the world eliminates the opportunity for indifference. To stand with indifference is to stand with the oppressor.

Read More
3128 Words | 13 Pages

Philip Manning 12504697 Q) Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. There can be no doubt that Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ is unrealistic, unfair and not sustainable. Singer’s arguments are valid arguments but not sound. In order to get a clear and balanced view of my arguments which disprove the Singer article, it is first necessary to examine and lay out the main aspects of Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. My arguments against Singer’s claims shall then be detailed and examined in depth.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

In this paper, I argue that Singer’s strong principle of sacrifice is flawed due to its over -demandingness. Singer denotes that as affluent individuals, we have a moral obligation to sacrifice up to the point of comparable moral significance to help those in absolute poverty. This essay will argue against Singer’s strong principle as it is psychologically too strong of an argument to be morally obliging. Singer’s argument exhorts us to give based on the controversial principle of comparable moral significance, to donate any income beyond that which is marginally necessary. Singer justifies this based on the knowledge that the suffering of a poor person should be no less significant to that of an affluent one (Singer, 1972).

Read More

More about Comparing The Singer Solution To World Hunger And Poverty By Peter Singer

Related Topics

Open Document