ipl-logo

Comparing Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government

791 Words4 Pages

Both Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau discuss the role of the individual in great lengths. In Emerson’s Self Reliance he expresses his frustration with the general population’s unwillingness to fulfill the duties of the individual. Emerson believes that everyone has innovative thoughts and ideas, but only true revolutionaries have the courage to share them with the world. In Thoreau’s Resistance to Civil Government he focuses on the rights of the individual as part of the State, or government. He believes that it is the people’s duty to disobey the laws if they are unjust.
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s view of the individual was greatly affected by his life experiences. He grew up and even became a pastor in a Unitarian church, but was skeptical …show more content…

Thoreau’s essay focuses on his belief that the individual has the right and the duty to protest unjust laws or an unjust government. He even spent the night in jail because he refused to pay the poll tax in order to protest the Mexican American War. Thoreau’s night in jail was the inspiration for his reasoning that “There will never be a really free and enlightened State, until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are deviated, and treats him accordingly.” (Thoreau 1872). He believed in the power of the individual as an essential part of the State and that “a single man can bend [the government] to his will.” but was frustrated with his impact as a single person on the actions of the government in the Mexican American War (Thoreau 1857). He even goes as far to “declare war with the State…” because “[he does] not care the course of [his] dollar... till it buys a man, or a musket to shoot one with.” (Thoreau 1869). When he was bailed out of jail he “saw to what extent the people among whom [he] lived could be trusted as good neighbors and friends” (Thoreau 1868) and was disappointed that they did not endeavor to cause political change. He asks the public to consider whether they “shall be content to obey them, or shall endeavor to amend them, and obey them until they have succeeded, or shall they transgress them at once” because “unjust laws exist” and it is the individuals duty to protest them (Thoreau

Show More
Related

The Hunger Games Rhetorical Analysis Essay

653 Words | 3 Pages

Thoreau believes that government should be lenient with their people and work with them for their common good, Gale actions as an individual shows that he agrees. In “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau explains his belief that the government should be tolerant. He explains, “[He] heartily accepts the motto, ‘That government is best which governs least’

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Steinbeck's Ideals For Government

943 Words | 4 Pages

In the society Steinbeck describes, if one were to disobey the rules, he “had no place in any world, no matter where created” (Steinbeck 266). Even though the families had rights, they seemingly did not have the right to protest if they believed a law was unjust. Because of this, the rulers of this society have all of the power. Individuals have to keep their own beliefs private and must adhere to society’s rules, not matter if they were right or wrong, in fear of being shamed. Comparatively, the very foundation of Thoreau’s beliefs is that humans have the right to rebel against a corrupt state.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Duty Of Civil Disobedience

820 Words | 4 Pages

By making people ponder on the unjust laws in society Thoreau hopes that it will draw more attention to the matter and convince people to help support the cause. Thoreau utilizes this strategy again to draw people’s attention towards the malfunctioning of the current government. He attended to make people question their attitude towards their government. Thoreau asks “how does it become a man to behave towards this American government today? [He answers], that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience By Thoreau

422 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout history there have been many political changes that are either supported, or not, by citizens. In the given passage from, "Civil Disobedience," by Thoreau, a perspective of disagreeing with the government ways, is provided. Thoreau explains how a government should be in comparison to how it really is by utilizing his words to set the tone and mode, imagery to achieve his audience's understanding, and diction to make his writing scholarly. Although tone and mode are not directly stated, you can infer that Thoreau meant for his writing to be taken as serious and powerful. His implementation of words such as, "inexpedient," "execute," " integrity," and "command," makes one think about their lawful rights and reflect on what rights are supported or

Read More

Analysis Of Henry David Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government

2124 Words | 9 Pages

Thoreau 's views on the government by comparing the government to a machine. He states, ”When the machine was producing injustice, it was the duty of conscientious citizens to be ‘a counter friction’ (i.e., a resistance) "to stop the machine.” The two major issues being debated in the United States during his life was slavery and the Mexican-American War in which were major reasons he wrote his essays. In the mid to late 1840’s slavery has been indoctrinated into American society in which caused rifts between Americans.

Read More

Similarities Between 'Resistance To Civil Government And' A Plea For Captain John Brown

956 Words | 4 Pages

In "A plea for Captain John Brown" Henry David Thoreau, argues for the morality of murder. While in the “resistance to civil government”, he argues about the civil right of the people. That government should not control the people. He also argues that a man is meant to make his own rules and the government should not make that rule for him.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Thomas Jefferson

897 Words | 4 Pages

He objected the injustices of war and slavery, and practiced civil disobedience in his daily life. In the time of Thoreau writing Civil Disobedience, many people believed revolution against the government had not been necessary since the time of the American Revolution. However, Thoreau believes that resisting an abusive government is especially important at this point in time considering that, "a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law." According to Thoreau, it is the duty of American citizens to promptly revolutionize against slavery and the Mexican-American War, which have both been supported by the corrupted American

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience

673 Words | 3 Pages

The individual's relationship to the state is a concept often entertained abstractly; at variance with this is Civil Disobedience, which analyzes Thoreau's first direct experience with state power in his brief 1846 imprisonment. Thoreau metaphorically detailed his search for virtue in the quote, "The finest qualities of our nature, like the bloom on fruits, can be preserved only by the most delicate handling. Yet we do not treat ourselves nor one another thus tenderly." (Thoreau 8) In Civil Disobedience Thoreau as earnest seeker and flawed captive of the conscience concertedly attempts to correct this shortcoming within the context of slavery and the Mexican-American War.

Read More

Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

1371 Words | 6 Pages

Individuals form the cornerstone of American identity by investing themselves to improve their country. Individuals act as the red blood cells to American, providing life-giving oxygen to the body. Like blood, the prosperity of the United States rests in the hands of the people. Henry David Thoreau discusses the importance of the individual in his essay “Civil Disobedience.”

Read More

Resistance To Civil Government Summary

1038 Words | 5 Pages

How could a common man who lived among others and had other individuals to support for, pay for necessities like food, water, or shelter without a steady income? Also, having to leave one’s position as a result of breaking the law to resist the government, could influence additional people to do the same, causing companies to eventually go out of business due to lack of employment. Breaking the law to resist a dishonest government may fulfill personal human moral obligations, but other areas such as job, family, and living situation would suffer in turn. Thoreau’s solution will not work in a society based on labor and profit. Even if the point was to protest against an unfair government, the negative outcomes outbalance the positive

Read More

Self-Reliance And Thoreau's Prison Comparison

1365 Words | 6 Pages

Thoreau explains that the state and societies prison “never intentionally confronts a man’s sense, intellectual or moral, but only his body, his senses. It is not armed with superior wit or honesty, but with superior physical strength” and furthermore that he “was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion” (1990). Therefore, Resistance to Civil Government is validating that prison is confinement and conformity, however, Thoreau will not be conforming to any such conformist state and neither should the reader. Thoreau finally reinforces that he is “not responsible for the successful working of the machinery of society” and that “if a plant cannot live according to its nature, it dies; and so man” (1990), Thoreau is explicating that society needs to be responsible for its self and become self-reliant, just as an individual should be, because it is the nature of the world and society and if it cannot live as such then it will not continue

Read More

Summary: An Identity Of Rebellion

1229 Words | 5 Pages

In Civil disobedience, by Thoreau, he suggests “There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived” (Thoreau, 1998, para. 45). Ideally, suggesting that all people should have power over the state. Thoreau defends his belief, saying, “Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong but conscience?—in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable?” then saying, “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator” (Thoreau, 1998, para. 4). Thoreau promotes the idea that every man should obey his own conscience, regardless of the established laws, for man is higher than the state.

Read More

Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government

467 Words | 2 Pages

Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil Government” influences the population to stand up for what is right by protesting peacefully. Some activists likely influenced by Thoreau’s work are Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglas. Thoreau speaks out against discrimination by stating, “His vote is of no more worth than that of any unprincipled foreigner or hireling native, who may have been bought.” (949), which means that we are all equal and have the same right to be heard. Jacobs and Douglas took part in civil disobedience and let their voices be heard through actions instead of following the crowd.

Read More

Henry David Thoreau On Civil Disobedience

801 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout all of time, people have needed to live according to their own agendas. Being forced to live a certain way has only caused trouble. That is why Henry David Thoreau supported civil disobedience to help people live according to their own beliefs. In the essay “On Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, the author defined and explained the effect of civil disobedience. Thoreau defined it as, civil disobedience is any peaceful action that demonstrates the disagreement of a person or persons with their government.

Read More

Gandhi And Mandela Rhetorical Analysis

486 Words | 2 Pages

"Thoreau, Gandhi, and Mandela" Henry David Thoreau, Mohands K. Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela reflect the spirit of optimism and individualism. Discussing each writer's message about the power of the individual to bring about social reform. From Civil Disobedience by Thoreau was an essay about a protest against slavery and the U.S. was with Mexico, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax- and was arrested. In "Civil Disobedience", he reflects on the night he spent in jail and criticizes the government for staying from its true purpose to serve the people. I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and system-theatrically.

Read More

More about Comparing Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government

Related Topics

Open Document