Comparing Tragedy And The Common Man

278 Words2 Pages
In the paper, “Tragedy and the Common Man,” (1949) Arthur Miller, the author, points out that tragedy is best suited for the common man, not high kings and nobles, as the great tragic works seem to suggest. Both the lowly and the high exhibit the ability to relate and comprehend tragedy because the underlying basis of what constitutes tragedy is applicable to both the high and low classes. This basic tenet of tragedy, as outlined by Miller is a character who is willing to risk it all to obtain, to the belief of the character, their place in the world. The reason for wanting to achieve this has some slight variations, but the story always ends in failure due to the character’s tragic flaw. This grand flaw, however, may not be a flaw at all.