Comparing William Shakespeare's The Tragedy Of Romeo And Juliet

578 Words3 Pages

I think Shakespeare is very lucky guy. If he didn't write famous plays like 'Julius Caesar', he would not be famous. It means that ‘The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet’ would not be famous. According to the class of Yensei University, the professor of the class of the tragedy said that if William Shakespeare didn’t write plays after he wrote ‘The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet’, then William Shakespeare would not be famous and won’t be loved by many readers as the fans of Maroon 5 buy the music songs what Maroon 5 sang whatever the music is not good. Also, I think William Shakespeare is bad person in the world because he made many students be disturbed by hard to understand. Of course, No gains without pains. However, it is very hard to approach the door of understanding. The entire boy students (I don't know girl students because I don't live in Lily dormitory) complained much about learning Romeo and Juliet. 'The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet' made me much more be …show more content…

Life is full of questions, so Literature will answer you which is stated at the back side of the Literature 9 book. How many students are answered their questions by “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet”. Our 9 grade students, even the students who study Literature by ‘McDougal Litell Literature’ book in the world haven't learned about play in Literature class. Thus, we haven't read positive play. Our society is already negative. At this moment which the world is became already negative. Learning negative thing brings me to become negative because youths will become adults. Can you imagine? The learned things at young makes the people are established. Then, it affects the world to become more negative. I recommend learning positive play, if I have a chance to make time