ipl-logo

Contemporary Caribbean Society

1250 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Marx and weber on class

Compare and contrast Weber and Marx’s views about the evolution of society, and say which if any best describe contemporary Caribbean society. As I ponder on the contributions made by these two great men Max weber and Karl Marx I am left overwhelmed. Flabbergasted by the wealth of knowledge they possessed and the contributions they made towards our understanding of the society we live in. They emphasized on various ideas and perceptions about the environment that is still relevant centuries later. Although the great saying says, “great minds think alike,” but great minds can share some differences too. In the quest to comprehend their perception on the evolution of society I will compare and contrast their views and highlight the one that …show more content…

However some of Karl Max views stand out clearly in my sight. In today’s contemporary Caribbean society I see Max’s capitalism view is evident. The production of material goods is still characterized by the same two keys features thus giving rise to the powerful and the powerless or those that have and those who don’t have. The proletariat continues to produce goods for the benefit of the bourgeoisie for very little wages. I can use myself and many other persons in my little Island as an example. Working in various sectors, the wage is below market value, the hours are long and the conditions are not favorable. Yet production maintains a profit and secure future investment for this dominant group in society. This unequal share of wealth comes with it unequal share of power and privileges. One can also see the rise of conflict. Conflict is evident between the bourgeoisies as they strive to obtain more. This is manifested in the buying and selling or closure of various establishments. Conflict is also visible in the proletariat who becomes hostile over possession, goals and values in an effort to change …show more content…

These views have contributed in the shaping and understanding of our society.

Reference
Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
Mustapha, N. (2013). Sociology for Caribbean Students. Kingston: Ian Randle Publisher.
University of the West Indies. (2005). Introduction to Sociology Readings. open campuses: University of the West Indies.
UWI. (2005). Introduction to Sociology.

Show More
Related
1413 Words | 6 Pages

Stuart gave well historical accounts of how the much mixing of people from different cultural background and race conglomerate to form cultural setting currently present in the Caribbean islands. The literature from this novel can be successfully applied in learning institution teach race and ethnic relation courses to assist students in gaining a significant understanding the Barbados inhabitants history. Though the author of the book speaks of the assimilation race in a very compassionate way, she efficaciously demonstrates the how the spectrum of color originated in this Island. According to her, this societal predicament connects to colonialism; the slave trade from Africa to American as well as the oppressive injustices came with the expansion of sugar plantations to meet the booming market demand during the period. The slaves worked under a harsh environmental condition where their masters denied them fundamental rights of human being.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

In the 1940s and the 1950s the conflict theory was ignored because sociologist thought it was solely economic. Today, sociologists see that conflict is found between many different groups in society. (Crossman) According to the conflict theory, inequality is the result of those who are wealthy, typically those in the upper one percent, which impose their mode of social order on the rest of the general society. In result, society is constantly competing for limited resources.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Meanwhile, more technological advances, the more the laborer is devalued inciting displacement and more despairing modes of labor. Marx illustrates the disparity by stating that: Labor produces for the rich wonderful things – but for the worker it produces privation. It produces palaces – but for the worker, hovels. It produces beauty – but for the worker, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back into barbarous types of labor

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

When using a Marxist lens the viewer must focus on social classes and how power is distributed throughout these classes, including who holds the power and who is inferior to that power in the society. One question that might come about when viewing the

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

2. Marx, Durkheim and Weber each have particular ways of handling social cohesion and change in human society or culture. Where does social cohesion and change come from, how does it happen, and what causes it? Does each have an analysis of change or merely a typology of stages? Are the causes of social cohesion and change materialist, idealist or some other approach?

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Foundations of Sociology (SOC10010) Mid-Term Essay: Question: ‘’Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.’’ Answer: In this essay I have been asked to discuss three main ideas from the ‘’Communist Manifesto’’, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. To do this I will summarise three main ideas from the text and critically analyse them.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction The theory of evolution has been discussed, evaluated, and researched many times since the theory was first brought to light. Darwin’s theory of evolution is said to be divided into two parts, common decent and natural selection (Bouzat, 2014). Many research papers agreeing with Darwin’s theory comment on the diversity of a species and how they have descended from one common ancestor. Natural selection is a process in which species that are better adapted to the environment tend to survive and reproduce (Dictonary.com).

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

The bourgeoisie society has created new classes and ranks, new conditions of domination and new struggles. It was not about family relationships anymore but about money relations. Bourgeoisie cannot exist without it constantly

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

Comparison of Marx and Weber for their approach about state and society: Max Weber is one of the philosophers able to explain economic systems such as capitalism. He was born in Germany in 1864 at that time there were a dramatic change in Germany in terms of industrial so there were a transitional German period and that influenced by those changes happened. Max Weber has a specific ideology about state and society. Inconstant, Karl Marx was a sociologist who were born in Germany in 1818, his idea and ideology about state and society are revolutionary. In addition, he was influenced by the Communist party and he worked as a journalist, he wrote a number of books and articles about capitalism, state, and society.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Max Weber and Emile Durkheim are two of the three founding fathers of sociology, who are both famous for their scientific methods in their approach towards sociology. They both wanted their methodological approaches to be more and more organized and scientific, however because of the difference in their views on the idea of scientific, Durkheim’s approach tends to be more scientific than Weber’s. This is because Weber does not wish to approach sociology in the manner scientists approached the natural sciences and believes more in interpretive analysis, than observational analysis. In this paper, I will compare and contrast the methodological approaches of Weber and Durkheim and discuss how Weber’s approach is more historical and Durkheim’s

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

The conflict theory can be connected on both the full scale level and the miniaturized scale levels. Conflict theory tries to inventory the courses in which people with significant influence look to stay in force. In comprehension conflict theory, rivalry between social classes has key influence. For Marx, the conflict unmistakably emerges in light of the fact that all things of significant worth to man come about because of human work (Cross, 2011). As indicated by Marx, business people misuse specialists for their work and don 't share the products of these works similarly.

Read More
1638 Words | 7 Pages

Critically analyze the contribution of the Plural Society Model to your understanding of Caribbean Social Structure in the post -independence era. Shadee Douglas St. George’s university Social Structure and Caribbean Society Dr. Damian Greaves March 5th,2018.

Read More
1705 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction In the Caribbean, each territory has a unique social stratification systems which have been developed over the past centuries. This encouraged the people of these many cultures within the region to advance their social status - or his/her ‘social well-being,’ and the status of their family through the movement of social mobility. In this paper, it is my contention that social mobility is possible in the Caribbean since it allows persons to move in the social stratification system; secondly – to briefly address the current situation of social mobility within the Caribbean region, specifically in the countries of Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica and Guyana. And finally, that social mobility has shaped better opportunities in the Caribbean.

Read More

More about Contemporary Caribbean Society

Related Topics

Open Document